Cargando…

Peripheral Refraction in Myopic Children with and without Atropine Usage

PURPOSE: To compare the patterns of relative peripheral refractions of myopic children who were currently on atropine treatment for myopia control and myopic children who did not use atropine. METHODS: Chinese children (n = 209) aged 7 to 12 years participated in the study, 106 used atropine and 103...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Han-Yin, Lu, Wei-Yang, You, Jhen-Yu, Kuo, Hui-Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7240664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32454988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4919154
_version_ 1783536932816420864
author Sun, Han-Yin
Lu, Wei-Yang
You, Jhen-Yu
Kuo, Hui-Ying
author_facet Sun, Han-Yin
Lu, Wei-Yang
You, Jhen-Yu
Kuo, Hui-Ying
author_sort Sun, Han-Yin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the patterns of relative peripheral refractions of myopic children who were currently on atropine treatment for myopia control and myopic children who did not use atropine. METHODS: Chinese children (n = 209) aged 7 to 12 years participated in the study, 106 used atropine and 103 did not. Participants were also classified into three groups: emmetropes (SE: +0.50 to −0.50 D), low myopes (SE: −0.50 to −3.00 D), and moderate myopes (SE: −3.00 to −6.00 D). The central and peripheral refractions along the horizontal meridians (for both nasal and temporal fields) were measured in 10-degree steps to 30 degrees. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in spherical equivalent and astigmatism of the three refractive groups in either the nasal or temporal retina. The atropine group showed a significant relative myopia in the temporal 30° field in spherical equivalent compared to the emmetropic group (t(49) = 3.36, P=0.02). In eyes with low myopia, the atropine group had significant relative myopia in the nasal 30° and temporal 30° fields (t(118) = 2.59, P=0.01; t(118) = 2.06, P=0.04), and it is also observed at 20° and 30° of the nasal field for the moderate myopic group (t(36) = 2.37, P=0.02; t(2.84) = 2.84, P=0.01). CONCLUSION: Significant differences in relative peripheral refraction were found between the atropine group and its controls. The findings suggested that the eyes that received atropine may have a less prolate shape and thus explain why using atropine is effective in controlling myopia progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7240664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72406642020-05-23 Peripheral Refraction in Myopic Children with and without Atropine Usage Sun, Han-Yin Lu, Wei-Yang You, Jhen-Yu Kuo, Hui-Ying J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To compare the patterns of relative peripheral refractions of myopic children who were currently on atropine treatment for myopia control and myopic children who did not use atropine. METHODS: Chinese children (n = 209) aged 7 to 12 years participated in the study, 106 used atropine and 103 did not. Participants were also classified into three groups: emmetropes (SE: +0.50 to −0.50 D), low myopes (SE: −0.50 to −3.00 D), and moderate myopes (SE: −3.00 to −6.00 D). The central and peripheral refractions along the horizontal meridians (for both nasal and temporal fields) were measured in 10-degree steps to 30 degrees. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in spherical equivalent and astigmatism of the three refractive groups in either the nasal or temporal retina. The atropine group showed a significant relative myopia in the temporal 30° field in spherical equivalent compared to the emmetropic group (t(49) = 3.36, P=0.02). In eyes with low myopia, the atropine group had significant relative myopia in the nasal 30° and temporal 30° fields (t(118) = 2.59, P=0.01; t(118) = 2.06, P=0.04), and it is also observed at 20° and 30° of the nasal field for the moderate myopic group (t(36) = 2.37, P=0.02; t(2.84) = 2.84, P=0.01). CONCLUSION: Significant differences in relative peripheral refraction were found between the atropine group and its controls. The findings suggested that the eyes that received atropine may have a less prolate shape and thus explain why using atropine is effective in controlling myopia progression. Hindawi 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7240664/ /pubmed/32454988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4919154 Text en Copyright © 2020 Han-Yin Sun et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sun, Han-Yin
Lu, Wei-Yang
You, Jhen-Yu
Kuo, Hui-Ying
Peripheral Refraction in Myopic Children with and without Atropine Usage
title Peripheral Refraction in Myopic Children with and without Atropine Usage
title_full Peripheral Refraction in Myopic Children with and without Atropine Usage
title_fullStr Peripheral Refraction in Myopic Children with and without Atropine Usage
title_full_unstemmed Peripheral Refraction in Myopic Children with and without Atropine Usage
title_short Peripheral Refraction in Myopic Children with and without Atropine Usage
title_sort peripheral refraction in myopic children with and without atropine usage
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7240664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32454988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4919154
work_keys_str_mv AT sunhanyin peripheralrefractioninmyopicchildrenwithandwithoutatropineusage
AT luweiyang peripheralrefractioninmyopicchildrenwithandwithoutatropineusage
AT youjhenyu peripheralrefractioninmyopicchildrenwithandwithoutatropineusage
AT kuohuiying peripheralrefractioninmyopicchildrenwithandwithoutatropineusage