Cargando…

Prognostic factors for change in memory test performance after memory training in healthy older adults: a systematic review and outline of statistical challenges

BACKGROUND: The goal is to investigate prognostic factors for change in memory test performance in healthy older adults and to report and discuss the different statistical procedures used for investigating this topic in the literature. METHODS: Prognostic factors were here understood as any measures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roheger, Mandy, Folkerts, Ann-Kristin, Krohm, Fabian, Skoetz, Nicole, Kalbe, Elke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7240921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32478173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-020-0071-8
_version_ 1783536985679331328
author Roheger, Mandy
Folkerts, Ann-Kristin
Krohm, Fabian
Skoetz, Nicole
Kalbe, Elke
author_facet Roheger, Mandy
Folkerts, Ann-Kristin
Krohm, Fabian
Skoetz, Nicole
Kalbe, Elke
author_sort Roheger, Mandy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The goal is to investigate prognostic factors for change in memory test performance in healthy older adults and to report and discuss the different statistical procedures used for investigating this topic in the literature. METHODS: Prognostic factors were here understood as any measures that were investigated to estimate change in memory test performance. MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, CENTRAL, and PsycInfo were searched up to November 2019. Prognostic factor and prognostic factor finding studies investigating prognostic factors on verbal and non-verbal short- and long-term memory after conducting memory training in healthy older adults were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS tool. RESULTS: Our search yielded 12,974 results. We included 29 studies that address prognostic factors of change in memory test performance, including sociodemographic, (neuro-)psychological, genetic, and biological parameters. Studies showed high variation and methodological shortcomings with regard to the assessment, statistical evaluation, and reporting of the investigated prognostic factors. Included studies used different types of dependent variables (change scores vs. post-test scores) when defining change in memory test performance leading to contradictory results. Age was the only variable investigated throughout most of the studies, showing that older adults benefit more from training when using the change score as the dependent variable. CONCLUSION: Overall, there is a need for adequate reporting in studies of prognostic factors for change in memory test performance. Because of inconsistencies and methodological shortcomings in the literature, conclusions regarding prognostic factors remain uncertain. As a tentative conclusion, one may say that the higher the age of the participant, the more profound the improvement in memory test performance will be after memory training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42019127479.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7240921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72409212020-05-29 Prognostic factors for change in memory test performance after memory training in healthy older adults: a systematic review and outline of statistical challenges Roheger, Mandy Folkerts, Ann-Kristin Krohm, Fabian Skoetz, Nicole Kalbe, Elke Diagn Progn Res Review BACKGROUND: The goal is to investigate prognostic factors for change in memory test performance in healthy older adults and to report and discuss the different statistical procedures used for investigating this topic in the literature. METHODS: Prognostic factors were here understood as any measures that were investigated to estimate change in memory test performance. MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, CENTRAL, and PsycInfo were searched up to November 2019. Prognostic factor and prognostic factor finding studies investigating prognostic factors on verbal and non-verbal short- and long-term memory after conducting memory training in healthy older adults were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS tool. RESULTS: Our search yielded 12,974 results. We included 29 studies that address prognostic factors of change in memory test performance, including sociodemographic, (neuro-)psychological, genetic, and biological parameters. Studies showed high variation and methodological shortcomings with regard to the assessment, statistical evaluation, and reporting of the investigated prognostic factors. Included studies used different types of dependent variables (change scores vs. post-test scores) when defining change in memory test performance leading to contradictory results. Age was the only variable investigated throughout most of the studies, showing that older adults benefit more from training when using the change score as the dependent variable. CONCLUSION: Overall, there is a need for adequate reporting in studies of prognostic factors for change in memory test performance. Because of inconsistencies and methodological shortcomings in the literature, conclusions regarding prognostic factors remain uncertain. As a tentative conclusion, one may say that the higher the age of the participant, the more profound the improvement in memory test performance will be after memory training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42019127479. BioMed Central 2020-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7240921/ /pubmed/32478173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-020-0071-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Roheger, Mandy
Folkerts, Ann-Kristin
Krohm, Fabian
Skoetz, Nicole
Kalbe, Elke
Prognostic factors for change in memory test performance after memory training in healthy older adults: a systematic review and outline of statistical challenges
title Prognostic factors for change in memory test performance after memory training in healthy older adults: a systematic review and outline of statistical challenges
title_full Prognostic factors for change in memory test performance after memory training in healthy older adults: a systematic review and outline of statistical challenges
title_fullStr Prognostic factors for change in memory test performance after memory training in healthy older adults: a systematic review and outline of statistical challenges
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic factors for change in memory test performance after memory training in healthy older adults: a systematic review and outline of statistical challenges
title_short Prognostic factors for change in memory test performance after memory training in healthy older adults: a systematic review and outline of statistical challenges
title_sort prognostic factors for change in memory test performance after memory training in healthy older adults: a systematic review and outline of statistical challenges
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7240921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32478173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-020-0071-8
work_keys_str_mv AT rohegermandy prognosticfactorsforchangeinmemorytestperformanceaftermemorytraininginhealthyolderadultsasystematicreviewandoutlineofstatisticalchallenges
AT folkertsannkristin prognosticfactorsforchangeinmemorytestperformanceaftermemorytraininginhealthyolderadultsasystematicreviewandoutlineofstatisticalchallenges
AT krohmfabian prognosticfactorsforchangeinmemorytestperformanceaftermemorytraininginhealthyolderadultsasystematicreviewandoutlineofstatisticalchallenges
AT skoetznicole prognosticfactorsforchangeinmemorytestperformanceaftermemorytraininginhealthyolderadultsasystematicreviewandoutlineofstatisticalchallenges
AT kalbeelke prognosticfactorsforchangeinmemorytestperformanceaftermemorytraininginhealthyolderadultsasystematicreviewandoutlineofstatisticalchallenges