Cargando…

Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States

OBJECTIVES: To compare the risks of 1-month all-cause, major bleeding (MB)-related and stroke-related readmissions and the associated hospital resource use and costs among patients previously hospitalized for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and treated with warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deitelzweig, Steven, Baker, Christine L., Dhamane, Amol D., Mardekian, Jack, Dina, Oluwaseyi, Rosenblatt, Lisa, Russ, Cristina, Poretta, Tayla, Lingohr-Smith, Melissa, Lin, Jay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7241468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2020.1750418
_version_ 1783537073937973248
author Deitelzweig, Steven
Baker, Christine L.
Dhamane, Amol D.
Mardekian, Jack
Dina, Oluwaseyi
Rosenblatt, Lisa
Russ, Cristina
Poretta, Tayla
Lingohr-Smith, Melissa
Lin, Jay
author_facet Deitelzweig, Steven
Baker, Christine L.
Dhamane, Amol D.
Mardekian, Jack
Dina, Oluwaseyi
Rosenblatt, Lisa
Russ, Cristina
Poretta, Tayla
Lingohr-Smith, Melissa
Lin, Jay
author_sort Deitelzweig, Steven
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the risks of 1-month all-cause, major bleeding (MB)-related and stroke-related readmissions and the associated hospital resource use and costs among patients previously hospitalized for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and treated with warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran vs apixaban. METHODS: Adult patients hospitalized with NVAF (any discharge diagnosis position) who received apixaban, warfarin, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran during hospitalization were identified from the Premier database (1 January 2013–30 June 2017) and grouped into respective cohorts. Propensity score matching was used to generate cohorts with similar characteristics. In regression analyses the risk of readmissions that occurred within 1 month of discharge were evaluated and the associated length of stay (LOS) and costs compared. RESULTS: NVAF patients treated with warfarin vs apixaban had significantly greater risk of all-cause (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05; confidence interval [CI] = 1.02–1.08; p < .001), MB-related (OR: 1.28; CI: 1.16–1.42; p < .001), and stroke-related (OR: 1.33; CI: 1.11–1.58; p = .002) readmissions; for all readmission categories, average LOS was significantly longer and costs significantly higher for warfarin treated patients. NVAF patients treated with rivaroxaban versus apixaban had significantly greater risk of all-cause (OR: 1.06; CI: 1.02–1.09; p = .001) and MB-related (OR = 1.62; CI = 1.44–1.83; p < .001) readmissions, but not stroke-related readmission; for MB-related readmissions average LOS and costs were higher for rivaroxaban treated patients. Significant differences in risks of all-cause, MB-related, and stroke-related readmissions were not observed between the apixaban and dabigatran cohorts. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective real-world analysis of NVAF patients, apixaban treatment was associated with better clinical outcomes than warfarin or rivaroxaban and lower hospital resource burden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7241468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72414682020-06-01 Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States Deitelzweig, Steven Baker, Christine L. Dhamane, Amol D. Mardekian, Jack Dina, Oluwaseyi Rosenblatt, Lisa Russ, Cristina Poretta, Tayla Lingohr-Smith, Melissa Lin, Jay J Drug Assess Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: To compare the risks of 1-month all-cause, major bleeding (MB)-related and stroke-related readmissions and the associated hospital resource use and costs among patients previously hospitalized for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and treated with warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran vs apixaban. METHODS: Adult patients hospitalized with NVAF (any discharge diagnosis position) who received apixaban, warfarin, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran during hospitalization were identified from the Premier database (1 January 2013–30 June 2017) and grouped into respective cohorts. Propensity score matching was used to generate cohorts with similar characteristics. In regression analyses the risk of readmissions that occurred within 1 month of discharge were evaluated and the associated length of stay (LOS) and costs compared. RESULTS: NVAF patients treated with warfarin vs apixaban had significantly greater risk of all-cause (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05; confidence interval [CI] = 1.02–1.08; p < .001), MB-related (OR: 1.28; CI: 1.16–1.42; p < .001), and stroke-related (OR: 1.33; CI: 1.11–1.58; p = .002) readmissions; for all readmission categories, average LOS was significantly longer and costs significantly higher for warfarin treated patients. NVAF patients treated with rivaroxaban versus apixaban had significantly greater risk of all-cause (OR: 1.06; CI: 1.02–1.09; p = .001) and MB-related (OR = 1.62; CI = 1.44–1.83; p < .001) readmissions, but not stroke-related readmission; for MB-related readmissions average LOS and costs were higher for rivaroxaban treated patients. Significant differences in risks of all-cause, MB-related, and stroke-related readmissions were not observed between the apixaban and dabigatran cohorts. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective real-world analysis of NVAF patients, apixaban treatment was associated with better clinical outcomes than warfarin or rivaroxaban and lower hospital resource burden. Taylor & Francis 2020-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7241468/ /pubmed/32489717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2020.1750418 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Deitelzweig, Steven
Baker, Christine L.
Dhamane, Amol D.
Mardekian, Jack
Dina, Oluwaseyi
Rosenblatt, Lisa
Russ, Cristina
Poretta, Tayla
Lingohr-Smith, Melissa
Lin, Jay
Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States
title Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States
title_full Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States
title_fullStr Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States
title_short Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States
title_sort comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the united states
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7241468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2020.1750418
work_keys_str_mv AT deitelzweigsteven comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates
AT bakerchristinel comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates
AT dhamaneamold comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates
AT mardekianjack comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates
AT dinaoluwaseyi comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates
AT rosenblattlisa comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates
AT russcristina comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates
AT porettatayla comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates
AT lingohrsmithmelissa comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates
AT linjay comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates