Cargando…
Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States
OBJECTIVES: To compare the risks of 1-month all-cause, major bleeding (MB)-related and stroke-related readmissions and the associated hospital resource use and costs among patients previously hospitalized for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and treated with warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7241468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2020.1750418 |
_version_ | 1783537073937973248 |
---|---|
author | Deitelzweig, Steven Baker, Christine L. Dhamane, Amol D. Mardekian, Jack Dina, Oluwaseyi Rosenblatt, Lisa Russ, Cristina Poretta, Tayla Lingohr-Smith, Melissa Lin, Jay |
author_facet | Deitelzweig, Steven Baker, Christine L. Dhamane, Amol D. Mardekian, Jack Dina, Oluwaseyi Rosenblatt, Lisa Russ, Cristina Poretta, Tayla Lingohr-Smith, Melissa Lin, Jay |
author_sort | Deitelzweig, Steven |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the risks of 1-month all-cause, major bleeding (MB)-related and stroke-related readmissions and the associated hospital resource use and costs among patients previously hospitalized for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and treated with warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran vs apixaban. METHODS: Adult patients hospitalized with NVAF (any discharge diagnosis position) who received apixaban, warfarin, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran during hospitalization were identified from the Premier database (1 January 2013–30 June 2017) and grouped into respective cohorts. Propensity score matching was used to generate cohorts with similar characteristics. In regression analyses the risk of readmissions that occurred within 1 month of discharge were evaluated and the associated length of stay (LOS) and costs compared. RESULTS: NVAF patients treated with warfarin vs apixaban had significantly greater risk of all-cause (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05; confidence interval [CI] = 1.02–1.08; p < .001), MB-related (OR: 1.28; CI: 1.16–1.42; p < .001), and stroke-related (OR: 1.33; CI: 1.11–1.58; p = .002) readmissions; for all readmission categories, average LOS was significantly longer and costs significantly higher for warfarin treated patients. NVAF patients treated with rivaroxaban versus apixaban had significantly greater risk of all-cause (OR: 1.06; CI: 1.02–1.09; p = .001) and MB-related (OR = 1.62; CI = 1.44–1.83; p < .001) readmissions, but not stroke-related readmission; for MB-related readmissions average LOS and costs were higher for rivaroxaban treated patients. Significant differences in risks of all-cause, MB-related, and stroke-related readmissions were not observed between the apixaban and dabigatran cohorts. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective real-world analysis of NVAF patients, apixaban treatment was associated with better clinical outcomes than warfarin or rivaroxaban and lower hospital resource burden. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7241468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72414682020-06-01 Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States Deitelzweig, Steven Baker, Christine L. Dhamane, Amol D. Mardekian, Jack Dina, Oluwaseyi Rosenblatt, Lisa Russ, Cristina Poretta, Tayla Lingohr-Smith, Melissa Lin, Jay J Drug Assess Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: To compare the risks of 1-month all-cause, major bleeding (MB)-related and stroke-related readmissions and the associated hospital resource use and costs among patients previously hospitalized for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and treated with warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran vs apixaban. METHODS: Adult patients hospitalized with NVAF (any discharge diagnosis position) who received apixaban, warfarin, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran during hospitalization were identified from the Premier database (1 January 2013–30 June 2017) and grouped into respective cohorts. Propensity score matching was used to generate cohorts with similar characteristics. In regression analyses the risk of readmissions that occurred within 1 month of discharge were evaluated and the associated length of stay (LOS) and costs compared. RESULTS: NVAF patients treated with warfarin vs apixaban had significantly greater risk of all-cause (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05; confidence interval [CI] = 1.02–1.08; p < .001), MB-related (OR: 1.28; CI: 1.16–1.42; p < .001), and stroke-related (OR: 1.33; CI: 1.11–1.58; p = .002) readmissions; for all readmission categories, average LOS was significantly longer and costs significantly higher for warfarin treated patients. NVAF patients treated with rivaroxaban versus apixaban had significantly greater risk of all-cause (OR: 1.06; CI: 1.02–1.09; p = .001) and MB-related (OR = 1.62; CI = 1.44–1.83; p < .001) readmissions, but not stroke-related readmission; for MB-related readmissions average LOS and costs were higher for rivaroxaban treated patients. Significant differences in risks of all-cause, MB-related, and stroke-related readmissions were not observed between the apixaban and dabigatran cohorts. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective real-world analysis of NVAF patients, apixaban treatment was associated with better clinical outcomes than warfarin or rivaroxaban and lower hospital resource burden. Taylor & Francis 2020-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7241468/ /pubmed/32489717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2020.1750418 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Deitelzweig, Steven Baker, Christine L. Dhamane, Amol D. Mardekian, Jack Dina, Oluwaseyi Rosenblatt, Lisa Russ, Cristina Poretta, Tayla Lingohr-Smith, Melissa Lin, Jay Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States |
title | Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States |
title_full | Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States |
title_fullStr | Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States |
title_short | Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States |
title_sort | comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the united states |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7241468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2020.1750418 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deitelzweigsteven comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates AT bakerchristinel comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates AT dhamaneamold comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates AT mardekianjack comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates AT dinaoluwaseyi comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates AT rosenblattlisa comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates AT russcristina comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates AT porettatayla comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates AT lingohrsmithmelissa comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates AT linjay comparisonofreadmissionsamonghospitalizednonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientstreatedwithoralanticoagulantsintheunitedstates |