Cargando…

A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US

Healthier carbohydrate (carb)-rich foods are essential for health, but practical, validated indices for their identification are not established. We compared four pragmatic metrics, based on, per 10g of carb:(a) ≥1g fiber (10:1 carb:fiber), (b) ≥1g fiber and <1g free sugars (10:1:1 carb:fiber:fre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Junxiu, Rehm, Colin D., Shi, Peilin, McKeown, Nicola M., Mozaffarian, Dariush, Micha, Renata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7241725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32437371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231572
_version_ 1783537116574121984
author Liu, Junxiu
Rehm, Colin D.
Shi, Peilin
McKeown, Nicola M.
Mozaffarian, Dariush
Micha, Renata
author_facet Liu, Junxiu
Rehm, Colin D.
Shi, Peilin
McKeown, Nicola M.
Mozaffarian, Dariush
Micha, Renata
author_sort Liu, Junxiu
collection PubMed
description Healthier carbohydrate (carb)-rich foods are essential for health, but practical, validated indices for their identification are not established. We compared four pragmatic metrics, based on, per 10g of carb:(a) ≥1g fiber (10:1 carb:fiber), (b) ≥1g fiber and <1g free sugars (10:1:1 carb:fiber:free sugars), (c) ≥1g fiber and <2g free sugars (10:1:2 carb:fiber:free sugars); and (d) ≥1g fiber and, per each 1 g of fiber, <2g free sugars (10:1 carb:fiber, 1:2 fiber:free sugars; or 10:1|1:2). Using 2013–2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey /Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, we assessed, overall and for 12 food categories, whether each metric discriminated carb-rich products higher or lower (per 100g) in calories, total fat, saturated fat, protein, sugar, fiber, sodium, potassium, magnesium, folate, and 8 vitamins/minerals. Among 2,208 carb-rich products, more met 10:1 (23.2%) and 10:1|1:2 (21.3%), followed by 10:1:2 (19.2%) and 10:1:1 (16.4%) ratios, with variation by product sub-categories. The 10:1 and 10:1|1:2 ratios similarly identified products with lower calories, fat, free sugars, and sodium; and higher protein, fiber, potassium, magnesium, iron, vitamin B6, vitamin E, zinc and iron. The 10:1:2 and 10:1:1 ratios identified products with even larger differences in calories and free sugars, but smaller differences in other nutrients above and lower folate, thiamine, riboflavin, and niacin; the latter findings were attenuated after excluding breakfast cereals (~9% of products). These novel findings inform dietary guidance for consumers, policy, and industry to identify and promote the development of the healthier carb-rich foods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7241725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72417252020-06-08 A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US Liu, Junxiu Rehm, Colin D. Shi, Peilin McKeown, Nicola M. Mozaffarian, Dariush Micha, Renata PLoS One Research Article Healthier carbohydrate (carb)-rich foods are essential for health, but practical, validated indices for their identification are not established. We compared four pragmatic metrics, based on, per 10g of carb:(a) ≥1g fiber (10:1 carb:fiber), (b) ≥1g fiber and <1g free sugars (10:1:1 carb:fiber:free sugars), (c) ≥1g fiber and <2g free sugars (10:1:2 carb:fiber:free sugars); and (d) ≥1g fiber and, per each 1 g of fiber, <2g free sugars (10:1 carb:fiber, 1:2 fiber:free sugars; or 10:1|1:2). Using 2013–2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey /Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, we assessed, overall and for 12 food categories, whether each metric discriminated carb-rich products higher or lower (per 100g) in calories, total fat, saturated fat, protein, sugar, fiber, sodium, potassium, magnesium, folate, and 8 vitamins/minerals. Among 2,208 carb-rich products, more met 10:1 (23.2%) and 10:1|1:2 (21.3%), followed by 10:1:2 (19.2%) and 10:1:1 (16.4%) ratios, with variation by product sub-categories. The 10:1 and 10:1|1:2 ratios similarly identified products with lower calories, fat, free sugars, and sodium; and higher protein, fiber, potassium, magnesium, iron, vitamin B6, vitamin E, zinc and iron. The 10:1:2 and 10:1:1 ratios identified products with even larger differences in calories and free sugars, but smaller differences in other nutrients above and lower folate, thiamine, riboflavin, and niacin; the latter findings were attenuated after excluding breakfast cereals (~9% of products). These novel findings inform dietary guidance for consumers, policy, and industry to identify and promote the development of the healthier carb-rich foods. Public Library of Science 2020-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7241725/ /pubmed/32437371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231572 Text en © 2020 Liu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Junxiu
Rehm, Colin D.
Shi, Peilin
McKeown, Nicola M.
Mozaffarian, Dariush
Micha, Renata
A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US
title A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US
title_full A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US
title_fullStr A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US
title_short A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US
title_sort comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the us
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7241725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32437371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231572
work_keys_str_mv AT liujunxiu acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT rehmcolind acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT shipeilin acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT mckeownnicolam acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT mozaffariandariush acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT micharenata acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT liujunxiu comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT rehmcolind comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT shipeilin comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT mckeownnicolam comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT mozaffariandariush comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus
AT micharenata comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus