Cargando…
A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US
Healthier carbohydrate (carb)-rich foods are essential for health, but practical, validated indices for their identification are not established. We compared four pragmatic metrics, based on, per 10g of carb:(a) ≥1g fiber (10:1 carb:fiber), (b) ≥1g fiber and <1g free sugars (10:1:1 carb:fiber:fre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7241725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32437371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231572 |
_version_ | 1783537116574121984 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Junxiu Rehm, Colin D. Shi, Peilin McKeown, Nicola M. Mozaffarian, Dariush Micha, Renata |
author_facet | Liu, Junxiu Rehm, Colin D. Shi, Peilin McKeown, Nicola M. Mozaffarian, Dariush Micha, Renata |
author_sort | Liu, Junxiu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Healthier carbohydrate (carb)-rich foods are essential for health, but practical, validated indices for their identification are not established. We compared four pragmatic metrics, based on, per 10g of carb:(a) ≥1g fiber (10:1 carb:fiber), (b) ≥1g fiber and <1g free sugars (10:1:1 carb:fiber:free sugars), (c) ≥1g fiber and <2g free sugars (10:1:2 carb:fiber:free sugars); and (d) ≥1g fiber and, per each 1 g of fiber, <2g free sugars (10:1 carb:fiber, 1:2 fiber:free sugars; or 10:1|1:2). Using 2013–2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey /Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, we assessed, overall and for 12 food categories, whether each metric discriminated carb-rich products higher or lower (per 100g) in calories, total fat, saturated fat, protein, sugar, fiber, sodium, potassium, magnesium, folate, and 8 vitamins/minerals. Among 2,208 carb-rich products, more met 10:1 (23.2%) and 10:1|1:2 (21.3%), followed by 10:1:2 (19.2%) and 10:1:1 (16.4%) ratios, with variation by product sub-categories. The 10:1 and 10:1|1:2 ratios similarly identified products with lower calories, fat, free sugars, and sodium; and higher protein, fiber, potassium, magnesium, iron, vitamin B6, vitamin E, zinc and iron. The 10:1:2 and 10:1:1 ratios identified products with even larger differences in calories and free sugars, but smaller differences in other nutrients above and lower folate, thiamine, riboflavin, and niacin; the latter findings were attenuated after excluding breakfast cereals (~9% of products). These novel findings inform dietary guidance for consumers, policy, and industry to identify and promote the development of the healthier carb-rich foods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7241725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72417252020-06-08 A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US Liu, Junxiu Rehm, Colin D. Shi, Peilin McKeown, Nicola M. Mozaffarian, Dariush Micha, Renata PLoS One Research Article Healthier carbohydrate (carb)-rich foods are essential for health, but practical, validated indices for their identification are not established. We compared four pragmatic metrics, based on, per 10g of carb:(a) ≥1g fiber (10:1 carb:fiber), (b) ≥1g fiber and <1g free sugars (10:1:1 carb:fiber:free sugars), (c) ≥1g fiber and <2g free sugars (10:1:2 carb:fiber:free sugars); and (d) ≥1g fiber and, per each 1 g of fiber, <2g free sugars (10:1 carb:fiber, 1:2 fiber:free sugars; or 10:1|1:2). Using 2013–2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey /Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, we assessed, overall and for 12 food categories, whether each metric discriminated carb-rich products higher or lower (per 100g) in calories, total fat, saturated fat, protein, sugar, fiber, sodium, potassium, magnesium, folate, and 8 vitamins/minerals. Among 2,208 carb-rich products, more met 10:1 (23.2%) and 10:1|1:2 (21.3%), followed by 10:1:2 (19.2%) and 10:1:1 (16.4%) ratios, with variation by product sub-categories. The 10:1 and 10:1|1:2 ratios similarly identified products with lower calories, fat, free sugars, and sodium; and higher protein, fiber, potassium, magnesium, iron, vitamin B6, vitamin E, zinc and iron. The 10:1:2 and 10:1:1 ratios identified products with even larger differences in calories and free sugars, but smaller differences in other nutrients above and lower folate, thiamine, riboflavin, and niacin; the latter findings were attenuated after excluding breakfast cereals (~9% of products). These novel findings inform dietary guidance for consumers, policy, and industry to identify and promote the development of the healthier carb-rich foods. Public Library of Science 2020-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7241725/ /pubmed/32437371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231572 Text en © 2020 Liu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Junxiu Rehm, Colin D. Shi, Peilin McKeown, Nicola M. Mozaffarian, Dariush Micha, Renata A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US |
title | A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US |
title_full | A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US |
title_fullStr | A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US |
title_short | A comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the US |
title_sort | comparison of different practical indices for assessing carbohydrate quality among carbohydrate-rich processed products in the us |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7241725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32437371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liujunxiu acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus AT rehmcolind acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus AT shipeilin acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus AT mckeownnicolam acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus AT mozaffariandariush acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus AT micharenata acomparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus AT liujunxiu comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus AT rehmcolind comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus AT shipeilin comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus AT mckeownnicolam comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus AT mozaffariandariush comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus AT micharenata comparisonofdifferentpracticalindicesforassessingcarbohydratequalityamongcarbohydraterichprocessedproductsintheus |