Cargando…

Single versus bilateral lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Lung transplantation remains the only curative treatment for end-stage lung disease, conferring a better survival for some IPF patients, but whether they should receive double lung transplantation (DLT) or single lung transplantation (SLT) is still controversial. The aim of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Diandian, Liu, Yi, Wang, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7241801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32437437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233732
_version_ 1783537132691783680
author Li, Diandian
Liu, Yi
Wang, Bo
author_facet Li, Diandian
Liu, Yi
Wang, Bo
author_sort Li, Diandian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Lung transplantation remains the only curative treatment for end-stage lung disease, conferring a better survival for some IPF patients, but whether they should receive double lung transplantation (DLT) or single lung transplantation (SLT) is still controversial. The aim of this study was to determine which type of lung transplantation was more effective and relatively safe in IPF patients by meta-analysis. METHODS: Publications comparing overall survival (OS) or other perioperative characteristics between IPF patients undergoing SLT and DLT were selected from electronic databases. The hazard ratios (HRs) were abstracted or calculated to evaluate the survival outcome. Odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) were used to compare the causes of death or perioperative parameters. A random-effect model was used to combine data. Heterogeneity was quantified by means of an I(2) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The publication bias was estimated using the Eggers test with Begg’s funnel plots. RESULTS: 16 studies with 17,872 IPF cases who met the inclusion criteria were included in this meta-analysis. SLT was associated with declined post-transplant FEV1% (MD = -15.37, 95% CI:-22.28,-8.47; P<0.001), FVC % (MD = -12.52, 95% CI:-19.45,-5.59; P<0.001) and DLCO% (MD = -13.85, 95% CI:-20.42,-7.29; P<0.001), but no significant advantage of DLT over SLT was seen in the overall survival outcome (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.91–1.29; P = 0.391). Subgroup analyses for studies of follow-up period ≥ 60 months also showed similar results (all P-values>0.05). Moreover, there was fewer deaths attributable to primary graft dysfunction in SLT recipients (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.2–0.48; P<0.001), while more patients with SLT died of malignancy (OR = 3.44, 95% CI: 2.06–5.77; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that DLT was associated with better postoperative pulmonary function, but there was no difference in long-term overall survival between patients undergoing DLT and SLT. However, further high-quality and large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7241801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72418012020-06-03 Single versus bilateral lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Li, Diandian Liu, Yi Wang, Bo PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Lung transplantation remains the only curative treatment for end-stage lung disease, conferring a better survival for some IPF patients, but whether they should receive double lung transplantation (DLT) or single lung transplantation (SLT) is still controversial. The aim of this study was to determine which type of lung transplantation was more effective and relatively safe in IPF patients by meta-analysis. METHODS: Publications comparing overall survival (OS) or other perioperative characteristics between IPF patients undergoing SLT and DLT were selected from electronic databases. The hazard ratios (HRs) were abstracted or calculated to evaluate the survival outcome. Odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) were used to compare the causes of death or perioperative parameters. A random-effect model was used to combine data. Heterogeneity was quantified by means of an I(2) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The publication bias was estimated using the Eggers test with Begg’s funnel plots. RESULTS: 16 studies with 17,872 IPF cases who met the inclusion criteria were included in this meta-analysis. SLT was associated with declined post-transplant FEV1% (MD = -15.37, 95% CI:-22.28,-8.47; P<0.001), FVC % (MD = -12.52, 95% CI:-19.45,-5.59; P<0.001) and DLCO% (MD = -13.85, 95% CI:-20.42,-7.29; P<0.001), but no significant advantage of DLT over SLT was seen in the overall survival outcome (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.91–1.29; P = 0.391). Subgroup analyses for studies of follow-up period ≥ 60 months also showed similar results (all P-values>0.05). Moreover, there was fewer deaths attributable to primary graft dysfunction in SLT recipients (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.2–0.48; P<0.001), while more patients with SLT died of malignancy (OR = 3.44, 95% CI: 2.06–5.77; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that DLT was associated with better postoperative pulmonary function, but there was no difference in long-term overall survival between patients undergoing DLT and SLT. However, further high-quality and large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings. Public Library of Science 2020-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7241801/ /pubmed/32437437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233732 Text en © 2020 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Diandian
Liu, Yi
Wang, Bo
Single versus bilateral lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Single versus bilateral lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Single versus bilateral lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Single versus bilateral lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Single versus bilateral lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Single versus bilateral lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort single versus bilateral lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7241801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32437437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233732
work_keys_str_mv AT lidiandian singleversusbilaterallungtransplantationinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuyi singleversusbilaterallungtransplantationinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangbo singleversusbilaterallungtransplantationinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis