Cargando…

Did CDC’s 2006 Revised HIV Testing Recommendations Make a Difference? Evaluation of HIV Testing in the US Household Population, 2003–2010

OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in the prevalence of HIV testing among adults following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2006 revised HIV testing recommendations. DESIGN: The 2003–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodring, Joseph V., Kruszon-Moran, Deanna, Oster, Alexandra M., McQuillan, Geraldine M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7241860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25153918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000303
_version_ 1783537146180665344
author Woodring, Joseph V.
Kruszon-Moran, Deanna
Oster, Alexandra M.
McQuillan, Geraldine M.
author_facet Woodring, Joseph V.
Kruszon-Moran, Deanna
Oster, Alexandra M.
McQuillan, Geraldine M.
author_sort Woodring, Joseph V.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in the prevalence of HIV testing among adults following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2006 revised HIV testing recommendations. DESIGN: The 2003–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of the noninstitutionalized US population. METHODS: Weighted estimates and multivariable modeling to assess the prevalence of lifetime HIV testing, outside of blood donations, based on 13,975 respondents aged 18–59 years, comparing the 2003–2006 and 2007–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. RESULTS: Overall, HIV testing was 42.1% during 2003–2006 and 44.5% during 2007–2010 (P > 0.05). After adjusting for significant predictors in a multivariate model, HIV testing increased from 2003–2006 to 2007–2010 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.14, P < 0.05), mostly among males (aOR 1.33, P < 0.001) as compared with females (aOR 1.02, P > 0.05). HIV testing also increased significantly among non-Hispanic blacks, heterosexuals, those aged 50–59 years, those without a sexually transmitted infection history, those without health insurance, and those who did not access health care in the past year. HIV testing did not change significantly among high-risk groups, including men who have sex with men, those with a history of injection or illicit drug use, and those with a sexually transmitted infection history. CONCLUSIONS: In multivariate modeling, we found a modest but significant increase in HIV testing overall and among males after publication of the revised recommendations for HIV testing. The significant increase in non–high-risk groups suggests an expansion in generalized HIV testing, as recommended. However, even in 2007–2010, 56% of the US population has never been tested for HIV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7241860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72418602020-05-21 Did CDC’s 2006 Revised HIV Testing Recommendations Make a Difference? Evaluation of HIV Testing in the US Household Population, 2003–2010 Woodring, Joseph V. Kruszon-Moran, Deanna Oster, Alexandra M. McQuillan, Geraldine M. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Article OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in the prevalence of HIV testing among adults following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2006 revised HIV testing recommendations. DESIGN: The 2003–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of the noninstitutionalized US population. METHODS: Weighted estimates and multivariable modeling to assess the prevalence of lifetime HIV testing, outside of blood donations, based on 13,975 respondents aged 18–59 years, comparing the 2003–2006 and 2007–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. RESULTS: Overall, HIV testing was 42.1% during 2003–2006 and 44.5% during 2007–2010 (P > 0.05). After adjusting for significant predictors in a multivariate model, HIV testing increased from 2003–2006 to 2007–2010 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.14, P < 0.05), mostly among males (aOR 1.33, P < 0.001) as compared with females (aOR 1.02, P > 0.05). HIV testing also increased significantly among non-Hispanic blacks, heterosexuals, those aged 50–59 years, those without a sexually transmitted infection history, those without health insurance, and those who did not access health care in the past year. HIV testing did not change significantly among high-risk groups, including men who have sex with men, those with a history of injection or illicit drug use, and those with a sexually transmitted infection history. CONCLUSIONS: In multivariate modeling, we found a modest but significant increase in HIV testing overall and among males after publication of the revised recommendations for HIV testing. The significant increase in non–high-risk groups suggests an expansion in generalized HIV testing, as recommended. However, even in 2007–2010, 56% of the US population has never been tested for HIV. 2014-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7241860/ /pubmed/25153918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000303 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivitives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Article
Woodring, Joseph V.
Kruszon-Moran, Deanna
Oster, Alexandra M.
McQuillan, Geraldine M.
Did CDC’s 2006 Revised HIV Testing Recommendations Make a Difference? Evaluation of HIV Testing in the US Household Population, 2003–2010
title Did CDC’s 2006 Revised HIV Testing Recommendations Make a Difference? Evaluation of HIV Testing in the US Household Population, 2003–2010
title_full Did CDC’s 2006 Revised HIV Testing Recommendations Make a Difference? Evaluation of HIV Testing in the US Household Population, 2003–2010
title_fullStr Did CDC’s 2006 Revised HIV Testing Recommendations Make a Difference? Evaluation of HIV Testing in the US Household Population, 2003–2010
title_full_unstemmed Did CDC’s 2006 Revised HIV Testing Recommendations Make a Difference? Evaluation of HIV Testing in the US Household Population, 2003–2010
title_short Did CDC’s 2006 Revised HIV Testing Recommendations Make a Difference? Evaluation of HIV Testing in the US Household Population, 2003–2010
title_sort did cdc’s 2006 revised hiv testing recommendations make a difference? evaluation of hiv testing in the us household population, 2003–2010
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7241860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25153918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000303
work_keys_str_mv AT woodringjosephv didcdcs2006revisedhivtestingrecommendationsmakeadifferenceevaluationofhivtestingintheushouseholdpopulation20032010
AT kruszonmorandeanna didcdcs2006revisedhivtestingrecommendationsmakeadifferenceevaluationofhivtestingintheushouseholdpopulation20032010
AT osteralexandram didcdcs2006revisedhivtestingrecommendationsmakeadifferenceevaluationofhivtestingintheushouseholdpopulation20032010
AT mcquillangeraldinem didcdcs2006revisedhivtestingrecommendationsmakeadifferenceevaluationofhivtestingintheushouseholdpopulation20032010