Cargando…

Predicting self-harm in prisoners: Risk factors and a prognostic model in a cohort of 542 prison entrants

BACKGROUND. Self-harm is common in prisoners. There is an association between self-harm in prisoners and subsequent suicide, both within prison and on release. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate a prediction model to identify male prisoners at high risk of self-harm. METHODS. We develo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryland, Howard, Gould, Charlotte, McGeorge, Tristan, Hawton, Keith, Fazel, Seena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7242092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32342827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.40
_version_ 1783537179671134208
author Ryland, Howard
Gould, Charlotte
McGeorge, Tristan
Hawton, Keith
Fazel, Seena
author_facet Ryland, Howard
Gould, Charlotte
McGeorge, Tristan
Hawton, Keith
Fazel, Seena
author_sort Ryland, Howard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. Self-harm is common in prisoners. There is an association between self-harm in prisoners and subsequent suicide, both within prison and on release. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate a prediction model to identify male prisoners at high risk of self-harm. METHODS. We developed an 11-item screening model, based on risk factors identified from the literature. This screen was administered to 542 prisoners within 7 days of arrival in two male prisons in England. Participants were followed up for 6 months to identify those who subsequently self-harmed in prison. Analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazard regression. Discrimination and calibration were determined for the model. The model was subsequently optimized using multivariable analysis, weighting variables, and dropping poorly performing items. RESULTS. Seventeen (3.1%) of the participants self-harmed during follow up (median 53 days). The strongest risk factors were previous self-harm in prison (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 9.3 [95% CI: 3.3–16.6]) and current suicidal ideation (aHR = 7.6 [2.1–27.4]). As a continuous score, a one-point increase in the suicide screen was significantly associated with self-harm (HR = 1.4, 1.1–1.7). At the prespecified cut off score of 5, the screening model was associated with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66 (0.53–0.79), with poor calibration. The optimized model saw two items dropped from the original screening tool, weighting of risk factors based on a multivariable model, and an AUC of 0.84 (0.76–0.92). CONCLUSIONS. Further work is necessary to clarify the association between risk factors and self-harm in prison. Despite good face validity, current screening tools for self-harm need validation in new prison samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7242092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72420922020-05-21 Predicting self-harm in prisoners: Risk factors and a prognostic model in a cohort of 542 prison entrants Ryland, Howard Gould, Charlotte McGeorge, Tristan Hawton, Keith Fazel, Seena Eur Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND. Self-harm is common in prisoners. There is an association between self-harm in prisoners and subsequent suicide, both within prison and on release. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate a prediction model to identify male prisoners at high risk of self-harm. METHODS. We developed an 11-item screening model, based on risk factors identified from the literature. This screen was administered to 542 prisoners within 7 days of arrival in two male prisons in England. Participants were followed up for 6 months to identify those who subsequently self-harmed in prison. Analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazard regression. Discrimination and calibration were determined for the model. The model was subsequently optimized using multivariable analysis, weighting variables, and dropping poorly performing items. RESULTS. Seventeen (3.1%) of the participants self-harmed during follow up (median 53 days). The strongest risk factors were previous self-harm in prison (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 9.3 [95% CI: 3.3–16.6]) and current suicidal ideation (aHR = 7.6 [2.1–27.4]). As a continuous score, a one-point increase in the suicide screen was significantly associated with self-harm (HR = 1.4, 1.1–1.7). At the prespecified cut off score of 5, the screening model was associated with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66 (0.53–0.79), with poor calibration. The optimized model saw two items dropped from the original screening tool, weighting of risk factors based on a multivariable model, and an AUC of 0.84 (0.76–0.92). CONCLUSIONS. Further work is necessary to clarify the association between risk factors and self-harm in prison. Despite good face validity, current screening tools for self-harm need validation in new prison samples. Cambridge University Press 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7242092/ /pubmed/32342827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.40 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ryland, Howard
Gould, Charlotte
McGeorge, Tristan
Hawton, Keith
Fazel, Seena
Predicting self-harm in prisoners: Risk factors and a prognostic model in a cohort of 542 prison entrants
title Predicting self-harm in prisoners: Risk factors and a prognostic model in a cohort of 542 prison entrants
title_full Predicting self-harm in prisoners: Risk factors and a prognostic model in a cohort of 542 prison entrants
title_fullStr Predicting self-harm in prisoners: Risk factors and a prognostic model in a cohort of 542 prison entrants
title_full_unstemmed Predicting self-harm in prisoners: Risk factors and a prognostic model in a cohort of 542 prison entrants
title_short Predicting self-harm in prisoners: Risk factors and a prognostic model in a cohort of 542 prison entrants
title_sort predicting self-harm in prisoners: risk factors and a prognostic model in a cohort of 542 prison entrants
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7242092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32342827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.40
work_keys_str_mv AT rylandhoward predictingselfharminprisonersriskfactorsandaprognosticmodelinacohortof542prisonentrants
AT gouldcharlotte predictingselfharminprisonersriskfactorsandaprognosticmodelinacohortof542prisonentrants
AT mcgeorgetristan predictingselfharminprisonersriskfactorsandaprognosticmodelinacohortof542prisonentrants
AT hawtonkeith predictingselfharminprisonersriskfactorsandaprognosticmodelinacohortof542prisonentrants
AT fazelseena predictingselfharminprisonersriskfactorsandaprognosticmodelinacohortof542prisonentrants