Cargando…
Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for the Treatment of Herpangina: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
BACKGROUND: Considering the limitations of broad-spectrum antiviral drugs for the treatment of herpangina and the extensive exploration of Chinese herbal injections (CHIs), systematic evaluation of the efficacy of different CHIs in the treatment of herpangina is a key imperative. In this study, we p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7242616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477147 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00693 |
_version_ | 1783537264857448448 |
---|---|
author | Duan, Xiaojiao Wang, Haojia Wu, Jiarui Zhou, Wei Wang, Kaihuan Liu, Xinkui |
author_facet | Duan, Xiaojiao Wang, Haojia Wu, Jiarui Zhou, Wei Wang, Kaihuan Liu, Xinkui |
author_sort | Duan, Xiaojiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Considering the limitations of broad-spectrum antiviral drugs for the treatment of herpangina and the extensive exploration of Chinese herbal injections (CHIs), systematic evaluation of the efficacy of different CHIs in the treatment of herpangina is a key imperative. In this study, we performed a network meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of CHIs, including Reduning injection (RDN), Shuanghuanglian injection (SHL), Tanreqing injection (TRQ), Xiyanping injection (XYP), and Yanhuning injection (YHN), in the treatment of herpangina. METHODS: A systematic literature review including studies published before December 17, 2018, was conducted in several databases. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data were analyzed using STATA 13.0 and WinBUGS 1.4.3 software. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability values were applied to rank the examined treatments. Clustering analysis was performed to compare the effects of CHIs between two different outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 72 eligible randomized controlled trials involving 8,592 patients and five CHIs were included. All patients were under the age of 15 years, and most were under 7 years. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that RDN, XYP, and YHN had significantly better treatment performance than ribavirin. SHL (OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.09–0.34) and TRQ (OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.10–0.31) were obviously superior to ribavirin with respect to total clinical effectiveness. The results of SUCRA and cluster analysis indicated that RDN is the best intervention with respect to total clinical effectiveness, antipyretic time, and blebs disappearing time. Fifty-four studies described adverse drug reactions/adverse drug events (ADRs/ADEs), and 32 studies reported ADRs/ADEs in detail. CONCLUSIONS: CHIs were found to be superior to ribavirin in terms of treatment performance and may be beneficial for patients with herpangina. RDN had the potential to be the best CHI with respect to all outcome measures. More evidence is needed to assess the safety aspects of CHIs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7242616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72426162020-05-29 Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for the Treatment of Herpangina: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Duan, Xiaojiao Wang, Haojia Wu, Jiarui Zhou, Wei Wang, Kaihuan Liu, Xinkui Front Pharmacol Pharmacology BACKGROUND: Considering the limitations of broad-spectrum antiviral drugs for the treatment of herpangina and the extensive exploration of Chinese herbal injections (CHIs), systematic evaluation of the efficacy of different CHIs in the treatment of herpangina is a key imperative. In this study, we performed a network meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of CHIs, including Reduning injection (RDN), Shuanghuanglian injection (SHL), Tanreqing injection (TRQ), Xiyanping injection (XYP), and Yanhuning injection (YHN), in the treatment of herpangina. METHODS: A systematic literature review including studies published before December 17, 2018, was conducted in several databases. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data were analyzed using STATA 13.0 and WinBUGS 1.4.3 software. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability values were applied to rank the examined treatments. Clustering analysis was performed to compare the effects of CHIs between two different outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 72 eligible randomized controlled trials involving 8,592 patients and five CHIs were included. All patients were under the age of 15 years, and most were under 7 years. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that RDN, XYP, and YHN had significantly better treatment performance than ribavirin. SHL (OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.09–0.34) and TRQ (OR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.10–0.31) were obviously superior to ribavirin with respect to total clinical effectiveness. The results of SUCRA and cluster analysis indicated that RDN is the best intervention with respect to total clinical effectiveness, antipyretic time, and blebs disappearing time. Fifty-four studies described adverse drug reactions/adverse drug events (ADRs/ADEs), and 32 studies reported ADRs/ADEs in detail. CONCLUSIONS: CHIs were found to be superior to ribavirin in terms of treatment performance and may be beneficial for patients with herpangina. RDN had the potential to be the best CHI with respect to all outcome measures. More evidence is needed to assess the safety aspects of CHIs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7242616/ /pubmed/32477147 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00693 Text en Copyright © 2020 Duan, Wang, Wu, Zhou, Wang and Liu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Duan, Xiaojiao Wang, Haojia Wu, Jiarui Zhou, Wei Wang, Kaihuan Liu, Xinkui Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for the Treatment of Herpangina: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for the Treatment of Herpangina: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for the Treatment of Herpangina: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for the Treatment of Herpangina: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for the Treatment of Herpangina: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for the Treatment of Herpangina: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | comparative efficacy of chinese herbal injections for the treatment of herpangina: a bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7242616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477147 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00693 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duanxiaojiao comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforthetreatmentofherpanginaabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wanghaojia comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforthetreatmentofherpanginaabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wujiarui comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforthetreatmentofherpanginaabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhouwei comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforthetreatmentofherpanginaabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wangkaihuan comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforthetreatmentofherpanginaabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liuxinkui comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforthetreatmentofherpanginaabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |