Cargando…
How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements?
A series of experiments show that attribution of intentionality to figures depends on the interaction between the type of movement –Theory of Mind (ToM), Goal-Directed (GD), Random (R)– with the presence of human attributes, the way these figures are labeled, and their apparent velocity. In addition...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7242622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00935 |
_version_ | 1783537266248908800 |
---|---|
author | Morales-Bader, Diego Castillo, Ramón D. Olivares, Charlotte Miño, Francisca |
author_facet | Morales-Bader, Diego Castillo, Ramón D. Olivares, Charlotte Miño, Francisca |
author_sort | Morales-Bader, Diego |
collection | PubMed |
description | A series of experiments show that attribution of intentionality to figures depends on the interaction between the type of movement –Theory of Mind (ToM), Goal-Directed (GD), Random (R)– with the presence of human attributes, the way these figures are labeled, and their apparent velocity. In addition, the effect of these conditions or their interaction varies when the use of human nouns –present in the participant’s responses– is statistically controlled. In Experiment 1, one group of participants observed triangular figures (n = 46) and another observed humanized figures, called Stickman figures (n = 38). In ToM movements, participants attributed more intentionality to triangular figures than to Stickman figures. However, in R movements, the opposite trend was observed. In Experiment 2 (n = 42), triangular figures were presented as if they were people and compared to triangular figures presented in Experiment 1. Here, when the figures were labeled as people the attribution of intentionality only increased in R and GD movements, but not in ToM movements. Finally, in Experiment 3, Stickman figures (n = 45) move at a higher (unnatural) speed with higher frames per second (fps) than the Stickman figures of Experiment 1. This manipulation decreased the attribution of intentionality in R and GD movements but not in ToM movements. In general terms, it was found that the human attributes and labels promote the use of human nouns in participants’ responses, while a high apparent speed reduces their use. The use of human nouns was associated to intentionality scores significantly in R movements, but at a lesser extent in GD and ToM movements. We conclude that, although the type of movement is the most important cue in this sort of task, the tendency to attribute intentionality to figures is affected by the interaction between perceptual and semantic cues (figure shape, label, and apparent speed). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7242622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72426222020-05-29 How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements? Morales-Bader, Diego Castillo, Ramón D. Olivares, Charlotte Miño, Francisca Front Psychol Psychology A series of experiments show that attribution of intentionality to figures depends on the interaction between the type of movement –Theory of Mind (ToM), Goal-Directed (GD), Random (R)– with the presence of human attributes, the way these figures are labeled, and their apparent velocity. In addition, the effect of these conditions or their interaction varies when the use of human nouns –present in the participant’s responses– is statistically controlled. In Experiment 1, one group of participants observed triangular figures (n = 46) and another observed humanized figures, called Stickman figures (n = 38). In ToM movements, participants attributed more intentionality to triangular figures than to Stickman figures. However, in R movements, the opposite trend was observed. In Experiment 2 (n = 42), triangular figures were presented as if they were people and compared to triangular figures presented in Experiment 1. Here, when the figures were labeled as people the attribution of intentionality only increased in R and GD movements, but not in ToM movements. Finally, in Experiment 3, Stickman figures (n = 45) move at a higher (unnatural) speed with higher frames per second (fps) than the Stickman figures of Experiment 1. This manipulation decreased the attribution of intentionality in R and GD movements but not in ToM movements. In general terms, it was found that the human attributes and labels promote the use of human nouns in participants’ responses, while a high apparent speed reduces their use. The use of human nouns was associated to intentionality scores significantly in R movements, but at a lesser extent in GD and ToM movements. We conclude that, although the type of movement is the most important cue in this sort of task, the tendency to attribute intentionality to figures is affected by the interaction between perceptual and semantic cues (figure shape, label, and apparent speed). Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7242622/ /pubmed/32477225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00935 Text en Copyright © 2020 Morales-Bader, Castillo, Olivares and Miño. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Morales-Bader, Diego Castillo, Ramón D. Olivares, Charlotte Miño, Francisca How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements? |
title | How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements? |
title_full | How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements? |
title_fullStr | How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements? |
title_full_unstemmed | How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements? |
title_short | How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements? |
title_sort | how do object shape, semantic cues, and apparent velocity affect the attribution of intentionality to figures with different types of movements? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7242622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00935 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moralesbaderdiego howdoobjectshapesemanticcuesandapparentvelocityaffecttheattributionofintentionalitytofigureswithdifferenttypesofmovements AT castilloramond howdoobjectshapesemanticcuesandapparentvelocityaffecttheattributionofintentionalitytofigureswithdifferenttypesofmovements AT olivarescharlotte howdoobjectshapesemanticcuesandapparentvelocityaffecttheattributionofintentionalitytofigureswithdifferenttypesofmovements AT minofrancisca howdoobjectshapesemanticcuesandapparentvelocityaffecttheattributionofintentionalitytofigureswithdifferenttypesofmovements |