Cargando…

How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements?

A series of experiments show that attribution of intentionality to figures depends on the interaction between the type of movement –Theory of Mind (ToM), Goal-Directed (GD), Random (R)– with the presence of human attributes, the way these figures are labeled, and their apparent velocity. In addition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morales-Bader, Diego, Castillo, Ramón D., Olivares, Charlotte, Miño, Francisca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7242622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00935
_version_ 1783537266248908800
author Morales-Bader, Diego
Castillo, Ramón D.
Olivares, Charlotte
Miño, Francisca
author_facet Morales-Bader, Diego
Castillo, Ramón D.
Olivares, Charlotte
Miño, Francisca
author_sort Morales-Bader, Diego
collection PubMed
description A series of experiments show that attribution of intentionality to figures depends on the interaction between the type of movement –Theory of Mind (ToM), Goal-Directed (GD), Random (R)– with the presence of human attributes, the way these figures are labeled, and their apparent velocity. In addition, the effect of these conditions or their interaction varies when the use of human nouns –present in the participant’s responses– is statistically controlled. In Experiment 1, one group of participants observed triangular figures (n = 46) and another observed humanized figures, called Stickman figures (n = 38). In ToM movements, participants attributed more intentionality to triangular figures than to Stickman figures. However, in R movements, the opposite trend was observed. In Experiment 2 (n = 42), triangular figures were presented as if they were people and compared to triangular figures presented in Experiment 1. Here, when the figures were labeled as people the attribution of intentionality only increased in R and GD movements, but not in ToM movements. Finally, in Experiment 3, Stickman figures (n = 45) move at a higher (unnatural) speed with higher frames per second (fps) than the Stickman figures of Experiment 1. This manipulation decreased the attribution of intentionality in R and GD movements but not in ToM movements. In general terms, it was found that the human attributes and labels promote the use of human nouns in participants’ responses, while a high apparent speed reduces their use. The use of human nouns was associated to intentionality scores significantly in R movements, but at a lesser extent in GD and ToM movements. We conclude that, although the type of movement is the most important cue in this sort of task, the tendency to attribute intentionality to figures is affected by the interaction between perceptual and semantic cues (figure shape, label, and apparent speed).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7242622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72426222020-05-29 How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements? Morales-Bader, Diego Castillo, Ramón D. Olivares, Charlotte Miño, Francisca Front Psychol Psychology A series of experiments show that attribution of intentionality to figures depends on the interaction between the type of movement –Theory of Mind (ToM), Goal-Directed (GD), Random (R)– with the presence of human attributes, the way these figures are labeled, and their apparent velocity. In addition, the effect of these conditions or their interaction varies when the use of human nouns –present in the participant’s responses– is statistically controlled. In Experiment 1, one group of participants observed triangular figures (n = 46) and another observed humanized figures, called Stickman figures (n = 38). In ToM movements, participants attributed more intentionality to triangular figures than to Stickman figures. However, in R movements, the opposite trend was observed. In Experiment 2 (n = 42), triangular figures were presented as if they were people and compared to triangular figures presented in Experiment 1. Here, when the figures were labeled as people the attribution of intentionality only increased in R and GD movements, but not in ToM movements. Finally, in Experiment 3, Stickman figures (n = 45) move at a higher (unnatural) speed with higher frames per second (fps) than the Stickman figures of Experiment 1. This manipulation decreased the attribution of intentionality in R and GD movements but not in ToM movements. In general terms, it was found that the human attributes and labels promote the use of human nouns in participants’ responses, while a high apparent speed reduces their use. The use of human nouns was associated to intentionality scores significantly in R movements, but at a lesser extent in GD and ToM movements. We conclude that, although the type of movement is the most important cue in this sort of task, the tendency to attribute intentionality to figures is affected by the interaction between perceptual and semantic cues (figure shape, label, and apparent speed). Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7242622/ /pubmed/32477225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00935 Text en Copyright © 2020 Morales-Bader, Castillo, Olivares and Miño. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Morales-Bader, Diego
Castillo, Ramón D.
Olivares, Charlotte
Miño, Francisca
How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements?
title How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements?
title_full How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements?
title_fullStr How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements?
title_full_unstemmed How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements?
title_short How Do Object Shape, Semantic Cues, and Apparent Velocity Affect the Attribution of Intentionality to Figures With Different Types of Movements?
title_sort how do object shape, semantic cues, and apparent velocity affect the attribution of intentionality to figures with different types of movements?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7242622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32477225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00935
work_keys_str_mv AT moralesbaderdiego howdoobjectshapesemanticcuesandapparentvelocityaffecttheattributionofintentionalitytofigureswithdifferenttypesofmovements
AT castilloramond howdoobjectshapesemanticcuesandapparentvelocityaffecttheattributionofintentionalitytofigureswithdifferenttypesofmovements
AT olivarescharlotte howdoobjectshapesemanticcuesandapparentvelocityaffecttheattributionofintentionalitytofigureswithdifferenttypesofmovements
AT minofrancisca howdoobjectshapesemanticcuesandapparentvelocityaffecttheattributionofintentionalitytofigureswithdifferenttypesofmovements