Cargando…

A Qualitative Evaluation of the Pain Management VA-ECHO Program Using the RE-AIM Framework: The Participant's Perspective

Introduction: Veterans frequently seek chronic pain care from their primary care providers (PCPs) who may not be adequately trained to provide pain management. To address this issue the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Office of Specialty Care adopted the Specialty Care Access Network Extension...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ball, Sherry, Stryczek, Krysttel, Stevenson, Lauren, Hearns, Rene, Au, David H., Ho, P. Michael, Aron, David C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7242719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32500053
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00169
_version_ 1783537282341404672
author Ball, Sherry
Stryczek, Krysttel
Stevenson, Lauren
Hearns, Rene
Au, David H.
Ho, P. Michael
Aron, David C.
author_facet Ball, Sherry
Stryczek, Krysttel
Stevenson, Lauren
Hearns, Rene
Au, David H.
Ho, P. Michael
Aron, David C.
author_sort Ball, Sherry
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Veterans frequently seek chronic pain care from their primary care providers (PCPs) who may not be adequately trained to provide pain management. To address this issue the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Office of Specialty Care adopted the Specialty Care Access Network Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (VA-ECHO née SCAN-ECHO). The VA-ECHO program offered training and mentoring by specialists to PCPs and their staff. VA-ECHO included virtual sessions where expertise was shared in two formats: (1) didactics on common pain conditions, relevant psychological disorders, and treatment options and (2) real-time consultation on patient cases. Materials and methods: VA-ECHO participants' perspectives were obtained using a semi-structured interview guide designed to elicit responses based on the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework. A convenience sampling was used to recruit PCPs and non-physician support staff participants. Non-physicians from rural VHA sites were purposively sampled to gain diverse perspectives. Findings: This qualitative study yielded data on each RE-AIM domain except reach. Program reach was not measured as it is outside the scope of this study. Respondents reported program effectiveness as gains in knowledge and skills to improve pain care delivery. Effective incorporation of learning into practice was reflected in respondents' perceptions of improvements in: patient engagement, evidenced-based approaches, appropriate referrals, and opioid use. Program adoption included how participating health care systems selected trainees from a range of sites and roles to achieve a wide reach of pain expertise. Participation was limited by time to attend and facilitated by institutional support. Differences and similarities were noted in implementation between hub sites. Maintenance was revealed when respondents noted the importance of the lasting relationships formed between fellow participants. Discussion: This study highlights VA-ECHO program attributes and unintended consequences. These findings are expected to inform future use of VA-ECHO as a means to establish a supportive consultation network between primary and specialty care providers to promote the delivery evidence-based pain management practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7242719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72427192020-06-03 A Qualitative Evaluation of the Pain Management VA-ECHO Program Using the RE-AIM Framework: The Participant's Perspective Ball, Sherry Stryczek, Krysttel Stevenson, Lauren Hearns, Rene Au, David H. Ho, P. Michael Aron, David C. Front Public Health Public Health Introduction: Veterans frequently seek chronic pain care from their primary care providers (PCPs) who may not be adequately trained to provide pain management. To address this issue the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Office of Specialty Care adopted the Specialty Care Access Network Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (VA-ECHO née SCAN-ECHO). The VA-ECHO program offered training and mentoring by specialists to PCPs and their staff. VA-ECHO included virtual sessions where expertise was shared in two formats: (1) didactics on common pain conditions, relevant psychological disorders, and treatment options and (2) real-time consultation on patient cases. Materials and methods: VA-ECHO participants' perspectives were obtained using a semi-structured interview guide designed to elicit responses based on the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework. A convenience sampling was used to recruit PCPs and non-physician support staff participants. Non-physicians from rural VHA sites were purposively sampled to gain diverse perspectives. Findings: This qualitative study yielded data on each RE-AIM domain except reach. Program reach was not measured as it is outside the scope of this study. Respondents reported program effectiveness as gains in knowledge and skills to improve pain care delivery. Effective incorporation of learning into practice was reflected in respondents' perceptions of improvements in: patient engagement, evidenced-based approaches, appropriate referrals, and opioid use. Program adoption included how participating health care systems selected trainees from a range of sites and roles to achieve a wide reach of pain expertise. Participation was limited by time to attend and facilitated by institutional support. Differences and similarities were noted in implementation between hub sites. Maintenance was revealed when respondents noted the importance of the lasting relationships formed between fellow participants. Discussion: This study highlights VA-ECHO program attributes and unintended consequences. These findings are expected to inform future use of VA-ECHO as a means to establish a supportive consultation network between primary and specialty care providers to promote the delivery evidence-based pain management practices. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7242719/ /pubmed/32500053 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00169 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ball, Stryczek, Stevenson, Hearns, Au, Ho and Aron. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Ball, Sherry
Stryczek, Krysttel
Stevenson, Lauren
Hearns, Rene
Au, David H.
Ho, P. Michael
Aron, David C.
A Qualitative Evaluation of the Pain Management VA-ECHO Program Using the RE-AIM Framework: The Participant's Perspective
title A Qualitative Evaluation of the Pain Management VA-ECHO Program Using the RE-AIM Framework: The Participant's Perspective
title_full A Qualitative Evaluation of the Pain Management VA-ECHO Program Using the RE-AIM Framework: The Participant's Perspective
title_fullStr A Qualitative Evaluation of the Pain Management VA-ECHO Program Using the RE-AIM Framework: The Participant's Perspective
title_full_unstemmed A Qualitative Evaluation of the Pain Management VA-ECHO Program Using the RE-AIM Framework: The Participant's Perspective
title_short A Qualitative Evaluation of the Pain Management VA-ECHO Program Using the RE-AIM Framework: The Participant's Perspective
title_sort qualitative evaluation of the pain management va-echo program using the re-aim framework: the participant's perspective
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7242719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32500053
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00169
work_keys_str_mv AT ballsherry aqualitativeevaluationofthepainmanagementvaechoprogramusingthereaimframeworktheparticipantsperspective
AT stryczekkrysttel aqualitativeevaluationofthepainmanagementvaechoprogramusingthereaimframeworktheparticipantsperspective
AT stevensonlauren aqualitativeevaluationofthepainmanagementvaechoprogramusingthereaimframeworktheparticipantsperspective
AT hearnsrene aqualitativeevaluationofthepainmanagementvaechoprogramusingthereaimframeworktheparticipantsperspective
AT audavidh aqualitativeevaluationofthepainmanagementvaechoprogramusingthereaimframeworktheparticipantsperspective
AT hopmichael aqualitativeevaluationofthepainmanagementvaechoprogramusingthereaimframeworktheparticipantsperspective
AT arondavidc aqualitativeevaluationofthepainmanagementvaechoprogramusingthereaimframeworktheparticipantsperspective
AT ballsherry qualitativeevaluationofthepainmanagementvaechoprogramusingthereaimframeworktheparticipantsperspective
AT stryczekkrysttel qualitativeevaluationofthepainmanagementvaechoprogramusingthereaimframeworktheparticipantsperspective
AT stevensonlauren qualitativeevaluationofthepainmanagementvaechoprogramusingthereaimframeworktheparticipantsperspective
AT hearnsrene qualitativeevaluationofthepainmanagementvaechoprogramusingthereaimframeworktheparticipantsperspective
AT audavidh qualitativeevaluationofthepainmanagementvaechoprogramusingthereaimframeworktheparticipantsperspective
AT hopmichael qualitativeevaluationofthepainmanagementvaechoprogramusingthereaimframeworktheparticipantsperspective
AT arondavidc qualitativeevaluationofthepainmanagementvaechoprogramusingthereaimframeworktheparticipantsperspective