Cargando…

Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia

Background: There is a need to better understand the relationship between functional impairment and muscle mass in cancer cachexia. This study aimed to establish the relationship between computed tomography (CT)-derived muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), radiodensity, and skeletal muscle index (SMI)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Lindsey J., Chong, Nicole, Migula, Dorota, Sauer, Adam, Garrison, Michelle, Wu, Peter, Dash, Atreya, Garcia, Jose M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7244015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32499874
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27594
_version_ 1783537496601133056
author Anderson, Lindsey J.
Chong, Nicole
Migula, Dorota
Sauer, Adam
Garrison, Michelle
Wu, Peter
Dash, Atreya
Garcia, Jose M.
author_facet Anderson, Lindsey J.
Chong, Nicole
Migula, Dorota
Sauer, Adam
Garrison, Michelle
Wu, Peter
Dash, Atreya
Garcia, Jose M.
author_sort Anderson, Lindsey J.
collection PubMed
description Background: There is a need to better understand the relationship between functional impairment and muscle mass in cancer cachexia. This study aimed to establish the relationship between computed tomography (CT)-derived muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), radiodensity, and skeletal muscle index (SMI) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) parameters with functional performance in cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Handgrip strength, stair climb power (SCP), one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength, and body composition (CT and DXA) were compared across cancer patients with cachexia (CAC; N = 28), without cachexia (CNC; N = 28), and non-cancer patients (CON; N = 19). Multivariate regression was performed to find predictors of function. Results: CAC had lower CT muscle CSA and SMI and lower DXA appendicular lean mass (ALM) than CNC or CON (p ≤ 0.011). Muscle radiodensity was not different across groups despite larger proportion of low CT SMI in CAC, and CAC performed worse in SCP than CON (p = 0.018). In cancer patients, DXA ALM and CT muscle CSA each predicted physical function (p ≤ 0.05); muscle radiodensity did not, and DXA ALM explained more variability in SCP and 1RM than CT muscle CSA. Conclusions: Stair climb power was reduced in cancer cachexia; muscle radiodensity was not. Muscle mass by CT or DXA, but not radiodensity, predicted functional performance in cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7244015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72440152020-06-03 Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia Anderson, Lindsey J. Chong, Nicole Migula, Dorota Sauer, Adam Garrison, Michelle Wu, Peter Dash, Atreya Garcia, Jose M. Oncotarget Research Paper Background: There is a need to better understand the relationship between functional impairment and muscle mass in cancer cachexia. This study aimed to establish the relationship between computed tomography (CT)-derived muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), radiodensity, and skeletal muscle index (SMI) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) parameters with functional performance in cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Handgrip strength, stair climb power (SCP), one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength, and body composition (CT and DXA) were compared across cancer patients with cachexia (CAC; N = 28), without cachexia (CNC; N = 28), and non-cancer patients (CON; N = 19). Multivariate regression was performed to find predictors of function. Results: CAC had lower CT muscle CSA and SMI and lower DXA appendicular lean mass (ALM) than CNC or CON (p ≤ 0.011). Muscle radiodensity was not different across groups despite larger proportion of low CT SMI in CAC, and CAC performed worse in SCP than CON (p = 0.018). In cancer patients, DXA ALM and CT muscle CSA each predicted physical function (p ≤ 0.05); muscle radiodensity did not, and DXA ALM explained more variability in SCP and 1RM than CT muscle CSA. Conclusions: Stair climb power was reduced in cancer cachexia; muscle radiodensity was not. Muscle mass by CT or DXA, but not radiodensity, predicted functional performance in cancer patients. Impact Journals LLC 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7244015/ /pubmed/32499874 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27594 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Copyright: Anderson et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Anderson, Lindsey J.
Chong, Nicole
Migula, Dorota
Sauer, Adam
Garrison, Michelle
Wu, Peter
Dash, Atreya
Garcia, Jose M.
Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia
title Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia
title_full Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia
title_fullStr Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia
title_full_unstemmed Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia
title_short Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia
title_sort muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7244015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32499874
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27594
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonlindseyj musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia
AT chongnicole musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia
AT miguladorota musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia
AT saueradam musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia
AT garrisonmichelle musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia
AT wupeter musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia
AT dashatreya musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia
AT garciajosem musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia