Cargando…
Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia
Background: There is a need to better understand the relationship between functional impairment and muscle mass in cancer cachexia. This study aimed to establish the relationship between computed tomography (CT)-derived muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), radiodensity, and skeletal muscle index (SMI)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7244015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32499874 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27594 |
_version_ | 1783537496601133056 |
---|---|
author | Anderson, Lindsey J. Chong, Nicole Migula, Dorota Sauer, Adam Garrison, Michelle Wu, Peter Dash, Atreya Garcia, Jose M. |
author_facet | Anderson, Lindsey J. Chong, Nicole Migula, Dorota Sauer, Adam Garrison, Michelle Wu, Peter Dash, Atreya Garcia, Jose M. |
author_sort | Anderson, Lindsey J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: There is a need to better understand the relationship between functional impairment and muscle mass in cancer cachexia. This study aimed to establish the relationship between computed tomography (CT)-derived muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), radiodensity, and skeletal muscle index (SMI) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) parameters with functional performance in cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Handgrip strength, stair climb power (SCP), one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength, and body composition (CT and DXA) were compared across cancer patients with cachexia (CAC; N = 28), without cachexia (CNC; N = 28), and non-cancer patients (CON; N = 19). Multivariate regression was performed to find predictors of function. Results: CAC had lower CT muscle CSA and SMI and lower DXA appendicular lean mass (ALM) than CNC or CON (p ≤ 0.011). Muscle radiodensity was not different across groups despite larger proportion of low CT SMI in CAC, and CAC performed worse in SCP than CON (p = 0.018). In cancer patients, DXA ALM and CT muscle CSA each predicted physical function (p ≤ 0.05); muscle radiodensity did not, and DXA ALM explained more variability in SCP and 1RM than CT muscle CSA. Conclusions: Stair climb power was reduced in cancer cachexia; muscle radiodensity was not. Muscle mass by CT or DXA, but not radiodensity, predicted functional performance in cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7244015 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72440152020-06-03 Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia Anderson, Lindsey J. Chong, Nicole Migula, Dorota Sauer, Adam Garrison, Michelle Wu, Peter Dash, Atreya Garcia, Jose M. Oncotarget Research Paper Background: There is a need to better understand the relationship between functional impairment and muscle mass in cancer cachexia. This study aimed to establish the relationship between computed tomography (CT)-derived muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), radiodensity, and skeletal muscle index (SMI) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) parameters with functional performance in cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Handgrip strength, stair climb power (SCP), one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength, and body composition (CT and DXA) were compared across cancer patients with cachexia (CAC; N = 28), without cachexia (CNC; N = 28), and non-cancer patients (CON; N = 19). Multivariate regression was performed to find predictors of function. Results: CAC had lower CT muscle CSA and SMI and lower DXA appendicular lean mass (ALM) than CNC or CON (p ≤ 0.011). Muscle radiodensity was not different across groups despite larger proportion of low CT SMI in CAC, and CAC performed worse in SCP than CON (p = 0.018). In cancer patients, DXA ALM and CT muscle CSA each predicted physical function (p ≤ 0.05); muscle radiodensity did not, and DXA ALM explained more variability in SCP and 1RM than CT muscle CSA. Conclusions: Stair climb power was reduced in cancer cachexia; muscle radiodensity was not. Muscle mass by CT or DXA, but not radiodensity, predicted functional performance in cancer patients. Impact Journals LLC 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7244015/ /pubmed/32499874 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27594 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Copyright: Anderson et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Anderson, Lindsey J. Chong, Nicole Migula, Dorota Sauer, Adam Garrison, Michelle Wu, Peter Dash, Atreya Garcia, Jose M. Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia |
title | Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia |
title_full | Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia |
title_fullStr | Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia |
title_full_unstemmed | Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia |
title_short | Muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia |
title_sort | muscle mass, not radiodensity, predicts physical function in cancer patients with or without cachexia |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7244015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32499874 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27594 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersonlindseyj musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia AT chongnicole musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia AT miguladorota musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia AT saueradam musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia AT garrisonmichelle musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia AT wupeter musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia AT dashatreya musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia AT garciajosem musclemassnotradiodensitypredictsphysicalfunctionincancerpatientswithorwithoutcachexia |