Cargando…

Prediction of chronological and biological age from laboratory data

Aging has pronounced effects on blood laboratory biomarkers used in the clinic. Prior studies have largely investigated one biomarker or population at a time, limiting a comprehensive view of biomarker variation and aging across different populations. Here we develop a supervised machine learning ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sagers, Luke, Melas-Kyriazi, Luke, Patel, Chirag J, Manrai, Arjun K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7244024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32391803
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.102900
_version_ 1783537498530512896
author Sagers, Luke
Melas-Kyriazi, Luke
Patel, Chirag J
Manrai, Arjun K
author_facet Sagers, Luke
Melas-Kyriazi, Luke
Patel, Chirag J
Manrai, Arjun K
author_sort Sagers, Luke
collection PubMed
description Aging has pronounced effects on blood laboratory biomarkers used in the clinic. Prior studies have largely investigated one biomarker or population at a time, limiting a comprehensive view of biomarker variation and aging across different populations. Here we develop a supervised machine learning approach to study aging using 356 blood biomarkers measured in 67,563 individuals across diverse populations. Our model predicts age with a mean absolute error (MAE), or average magnitude of prediction errors, in held-out data of 4.76 years and an R(2) value of 0.92. Age prediction was highly accurate for the pediatric cohort (MAE = 0.87, R(2) = 0.94) but inaccurate for ages 65+ (MAE = 4.30, R(2) = 0.25). Variability was observed in which biomarkers carry predictive power across age groups, genders, and race/ethnicity groups, and novel candidate biomarkers of aging were identified for specific age ranges (e.g. Vitamin E, ages 18-44). We show that predictors for one age group may fail to generalize to other groups and investigate non-linearity in biomarkers near adulthood. As populations worldwide undergo major demographic changes, it is increasingly important to catalogue biomarker variation across age groups and discover new biomarkers to distinguish chronological and biological aging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7244024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Impact Journals
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72440242020-06-03 Prediction of chronological and biological age from laboratory data Sagers, Luke Melas-Kyriazi, Luke Patel, Chirag J Manrai, Arjun K Aging (Albany NY) Priority Research Paper Aging has pronounced effects on blood laboratory biomarkers used in the clinic. Prior studies have largely investigated one biomarker or population at a time, limiting a comprehensive view of biomarker variation and aging across different populations. Here we develop a supervised machine learning approach to study aging using 356 blood biomarkers measured in 67,563 individuals across diverse populations. Our model predicts age with a mean absolute error (MAE), or average magnitude of prediction errors, in held-out data of 4.76 years and an R(2) value of 0.92. Age prediction was highly accurate for the pediatric cohort (MAE = 0.87, R(2) = 0.94) but inaccurate for ages 65+ (MAE = 4.30, R(2) = 0.25). Variability was observed in which biomarkers carry predictive power across age groups, genders, and race/ethnicity groups, and novel candidate biomarkers of aging were identified for specific age ranges (e.g. Vitamin E, ages 18-44). We show that predictors for one age group may fail to generalize to other groups and investigate non-linearity in biomarkers near adulthood. As populations worldwide undergo major demographic changes, it is increasingly important to catalogue biomarker variation across age groups and discover new biomarkers to distinguish chronological and biological aging. Impact Journals 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7244024/ /pubmed/32391803 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.102900 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sagers et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Priority Research Paper
Sagers, Luke
Melas-Kyriazi, Luke
Patel, Chirag J
Manrai, Arjun K
Prediction of chronological and biological age from laboratory data
title Prediction of chronological and biological age from laboratory data
title_full Prediction of chronological and biological age from laboratory data
title_fullStr Prediction of chronological and biological age from laboratory data
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of chronological and biological age from laboratory data
title_short Prediction of chronological and biological age from laboratory data
title_sort prediction of chronological and biological age from laboratory data
topic Priority Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7244024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32391803
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.102900
work_keys_str_mv AT sagersluke predictionofchronologicalandbiologicalagefromlaboratorydata
AT melaskyriaziluke predictionofchronologicalandbiologicalagefromlaboratorydata
AT patelchiragj predictionofchronologicalandbiologicalagefromlaboratorydata
AT manraiarjunk predictionofchronologicalandbiologicalagefromlaboratorydata