Cargando…

Accuracy of tibial positioning in the frontal plane: a prospective study comparing conventional and innovative techniques in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Coronal alignment of the tibial component determines functional outcome and survival in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Innovative techniques for tibial instrumentation have been developed to improve accuracy and reduce the rate of outliers. METHODS: In a prospective study, 300 patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zahn, R. K., Graef, F., Conrad, J. L., Renner, L., Perka, C., Hommel, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7244465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32124032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03389-4
_version_ 1783537578957340672
author Zahn, R. K.
Graef, F.
Conrad, J. L.
Renner, L.
Perka, C.
Hommel, H.
author_facet Zahn, R. K.
Graef, F.
Conrad, J. L.
Renner, L.
Perka, C.
Hommel, H.
author_sort Zahn, R. K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coronal alignment of the tibial component determines functional outcome and survival in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Innovative techniques for tibial instrumentation have been developed to improve accuracy and reduce the rate of outliers. METHODS: In a prospective study, 300 patients were allocated to four different groups using a randomization process (two innovative and two conventional) techniques of tibial instrumentation (conventional: extramedullary, intramedullary; innovative: navigation and patient-specific instrumentation (PSI); n = 75 for each group). The aims were to reconstruct the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) to 90° and the mechanical tibio-femoral axis (mTFA) to 0°. Both angles were evaluated and compared between all groups three months after the surgery. Patients who presented with a postoperative mTFA > 3° were classified as outliers. RESULTS: The navigation and intramedullary technique both demonstrated that they were significantly more precise in reconstructing a neutral mTFA and MPTA compared to the other two techniques. The odd’s ratio (OR) for producing outliers was highest for the PSI method (PSI OR = 5.5, p < 0.05; extramedullary positioning OR = 3.7, p > 0.05; intramedullary positioning OR = 1.7, p > 0.05; navigation OR = 0.04, p < 0.05). We could only observe significant differences between pre- and postoperative MPTA in the navigation and intramedullary group. The MPTA showed a significant negative correlation with the mTFA in all groups preoperatively and in the extramedullary, intramedullary and PSI postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The navigation and intramedullary instrumentation provided the precise positioning of the tibial component. Outliers were most common within the PSI and extramedullary technique. Optimal alignment is dependent on the technique of tibial instrumentation and tibial component positioning determines the accuracy in TKA since mTFA correlated with MPTA pre- and postoperatively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7244465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72444652020-06-03 Accuracy of tibial positioning in the frontal plane: a prospective study comparing conventional and innovative techniques in total knee arthroplasty Zahn, R. K. Graef, F. Conrad, J. L. Renner, L. Perka, C. Hommel, H. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Knee Arthroplasty BACKGROUND: Coronal alignment of the tibial component determines functional outcome and survival in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Innovative techniques for tibial instrumentation have been developed to improve accuracy and reduce the rate of outliers. METHODS: In a prospective study, 300 patients were allocated to four different groups using a randomization process (two innovative and two conventional) techniques of tibial instrumentation (conventional: extramedullary, intramedullary; innovative: navigation and patient-specific instrumentation (PSI); n = 75 for each group). The aims were to reconstruct the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) to 90° and the mechanical tibio-femoral axis (mTFA) to 0°. Both angles were evaluated and compared between all groups three months after the surgery. Patients who presented with a postoperative mTFA > 3° were classified as outliers. RESULTS: The navigation and intramedullary technique both demonstrated that they were significantly more precise in reconstructing a neutral mTFA and MPTA compared to the other two techniques. The odd’s ratio (OR) for producing outliers was highest for the PSI method (PSI OR = 5.5, p < 0.05; extramedullary positioning OR = 3.7, p > 0.05; intramedullary positioning OR = 1.7, p > 0.05; navigation OR = 0.04, p < 0.05). We could only observe significant differences between pre- and postoperative MPTA in the navigation and intramedullary group. The MPTA showed a significant negative correlation with the mTFA in all groups preoperatively and in the extramedullary, intramedullary and PSI postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The navigation and intramedullary instrumentation provided the precise positioning of the tibial component. Outliers were most common within the PSI and extramedullary technique. Optimal alignment is dependent on the technique of tibial instrumentation and tibial component positioning determines the accuracy in TKA since mTFA correlated with MPTA pre- and postoperatively. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-03-02 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7244465/ /pubmed/32124032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03389-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Knee Arthroplasty
Zahn, R. K.
Graef, F.
Conrad, J. L.
Renner, L.
Perka, C.
Hommel, H.
Accuracy of tibial positioning in the frontal plane: a prospective study comparing conventional and innovative techniques in total knee arthroplasty
title Accuracy of tibial positioning in the frontal plane: a prospective study comparing conventional and innovative techniques in total knee arthroplasty
title_full Accuracy of tibial positioning in the frontal plane: a prospective study comparing conventional and innovative techniques in total knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr Accuracy of tibial positioning in the frontal plane: a prospective study comparing conventional and innovative techniques in total knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of tibial positioning in the frontal plane: a prospective study comparing conventional and innovative techniques in total knee arthroplasty
title_short Accuracy of tibial positioning in the frontal plane: a prospective study comparing conventional and innovative techniques in total knee arthroplasty
title_sort accuracy of tibial positioning in the frontal plane: a prospective study comparing conventional and innovative techniques in total knee arthroplasty
topic Knee Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7244465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32124032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03389-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zahnrk accuracyoftibialpositioninginthefrontalplaneaprospectivestudycomparingconventionalandinnovativetechniquesintotalkneearthroplasty
AT graeff accuracyoftibialpositioninginthefrontalplaneaprospectivestudycomparingconventionalandinnovativetechniquesintotalkneearthroplasty
AT conradjl accuracyoftibialpositioninginthefrontalplaneaprospectivestudycomparingconventionalandinnovativetechniquesintotalkneearthroplasty
AT rennerl accuracyoftibialpositioninginthefrontalplaneaprospectivestudycomparingconventionalandinnovativetechniquesintotalkneearthroplasty
AT perkac accuracyoftibialpositioninginthefrontalplaneaprospectivestudycomparingconventionalandinnovativetechniquesintotalkneearthroplasty
AT hommelh accuracyoftibialpositioninginthefrontalplaneaprospectivestudycomparingconventionalandinnovativetechniquesintotalkneearthroplasty