Cargando…

Acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of severe acetabular bone loss remains a difficult challenge. No classification system is available that combines intuitive use, structured design and offers a therapeutic recommendation according to the current literature and modern state of the art treatment options. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wirtz, Dieter Christian, Jaenisch, Max, Osterhaus, Thiemo Antonius, Gathen, Martin, Wimmer, Matthias, Randau, Thomas Martin, Schildberg, Frank Alexander, Rössler, Philip Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7244606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32100108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03379-6
_version_ 1783537610136748032
author Wirtz, Dieter Christian
Jaenisch, Max
Osterhaus, Thiemo Antonius
Gathen, Martin
Wimmer, Matthias
Randau, Thomas Martin
Schildberg, Frank Alexander
Rössler, Philip Peter
author_facet Wirtz, Dieter Christian
Jaenisch, Max
Osterhaus, Thiemo Antonius
Gathen, Martin
Wimmer, Matthias
Randau, Thomas Martin
Schildberg, Frank Alexander
Rössler, Philip Peter
author_sort Wirtz, Dieter Christian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The treatment of severe acetabular bone loss remains a difficult challenge. No classification system is available that combines intuitive use, structured design and offers a therapeutic recommendation according to the current literature and modern state of the art treatment options. The goal of this study is to introduce an intuitive, reproducible and reliable guideline for the evaluation and treatment of acetabular defects. METHODS: The proposed Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) is based on the integrity of the acetabular rim and supporting structures. It consists of 4 main types of defects ascending in severity and subdivisions narrowing down-defect location. Type 1 presents an intact acetabular rim, type 2 includes a noncontained defect of the acetabular rim ≤ 10 mm, in type 3 the rim defect exceeds 10 mm and type 4 includes different kinds of pelvic discontinuity. A collective of 207 preoperative radiographs were graded according to ADC and correlated with intraoperative findings. Additionally, a randomized sample of 80 patients was graded according to ADC by 5 observers to account for inter- and intra-rater reliability. RESULTS: We evaluated the agreement of preoperative, radiographic grading and intraoperative findings presenting with a k value of 0.74. Interobserver agreement presented with a k value of 0.62 and intraobserver at a k value of 0.78. CONCLUSION: The ADC offers an intuitive, reliable and reproducible classification system. It guides the surgeon pre- and intraoperatively through a complex field of practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7244606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72446062020-06-03 Acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification Wirtz, Dieter Christian Jaenisch, Max Osterhaus, Thiemo Antonius Gathen, Martin Wimmer, Matthias Randau, Thomas Martin Schildberg, Frank Alexander Rössler, Philip Peter Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Hip Arthroplasty INTRODUCTION: The treatment of severe acetabular bone loss remains a difficult challenge. No classification system is available that combines intuitive use, structured design and offers a therapeutic recommendation according to the current literature and modern state of the art treatment options. The goal of this study is to introduce an intuitive, reproducible and reliable guideline for the evaluation and treatment of acetabular defects. METHODS: The proposed Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) is based on the integrity of the acetabular rim and supporting structures. It consists of 4 main types of defects ascending in severity and subdivisions narrowing down-defect location. Type 1 presents an intact acetabular rim, type 2 includes a noncontained defect of the acetabular rim ≤ 10 mm, in type 3 the rim defect exceeds 10 mm and type 4 includes different kinds of pelvic discontinuity. A collective of 207 preoperative radiographs were graded according to ADC and correlated with intraoperative findings. Additionally, a randomized sample of 80 patients was graded according to ADC by 5 observers to account for inter- and intra-rater reliability. RESULTS: We evaluated the agreement of preoperative, radiographic grading and intraoperative findings presenting with a k value of 0.74. Interobserver agreement presented with a k value of 0.62 and intraobserver at a k value of 0.78. CONCLUSION: The ADC offers an intuitive, reliable and reproducible classification system. It guides the surgeon pre- and intraoperatively through a complex field of practice. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-25 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7244606/ /pubmed/32100108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03379-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Hip Arthroplasty
Wirtz, Dieter Christian
Jaenisch, Max
Osterhaus, Thiemo Antonius
Gathen, Martin
Wimmer, Matthias
Randau, Thomas Martin
Schildberg, Frank Alexander
Rössler, Philip Peter
Acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification
title Acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification
title_full Acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification
title_fullStr Acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification
title_full_unstemmed Acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification
title_short Acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification
title_sort acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification
topic Hip Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7244606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32100108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03379-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wirtzdieterchristian acetabulardefectsinrevisionhiparthroplastyatherapyorientedclassification
AT jaenischmax acetabulardefectsinrevisionhiparthroplastyatherapyorientedclassification
AT osterhausthiemoantonius acetabulardefectsinrevisionhiparthroplastyatherapyorientedclassification
AT gathenmartin acetabulardefectsinrevisionhiparthroplastyatherapyorientedclassification
AT wimmermatthias acetabulardefectsinrevisionhiparthroplastyatherapyorientedclassification
AT randauthomasmartin acetabulardefectsinrevisionhiparthroplastyatherapyorientedclassification
AT schildbergfrankalexander acetabulardefectsinrevisionhiparthroplastyatherapyorientedclassification
AT rosslerphilippeter acetabulardefectsinrevisionhiparthroplastyatherapyorientedclassification