Cargando…

Population‐specific effect of Wolbachia on the cost of fungal infection in spider mites

Many studies have revealed the ability of the endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia to protect its arthropod hosts against diverse pathogens. However, as Wolbachia may also increase the susceptibility of its host to infection, predicting the outcome of a particular Wolbachia‐host–pathogen interaction re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zélé, Flore, Altıntaş, Mustafa, Santos, Inês, Cakmak, Ibrahim, Magalhães, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7244807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6015
_version_ 1783537638865633280
author Zélé, Flore
Altıntaş, Mustafa
Santos, Inês
Cakmak, Ibrahim
Magalhães, Sara
author_facet Zélé, Flore
Altıntaş, Mustafa
Santos, Inês
Cakmak, Ibrahim
Magalhães, Sara
author_sort Zélé, Flore
collection PubMed
description Many studies have revealed the ability of the endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia to protect its arthropod hosts against diverse pathogens. However, as Wolbachia may also increase the susceptibility of its host to infection, predicting the outcome of a particular Wolbachia‐host–pathogen interaction remains elusive. Yet, understanding such interactions and their eco‐evolutionary consequences is crucial for disease and pest control strategies. Moreover, how natural Wolbachia infections affect artificially introduced pathogens for biocontrol has never been studied. Tetranychus urticae spider mites are herbivorous crop pests, causing severe damage on numerous economically important crops. Due to the rapid evolution of pesticide resistance, biological control strategies using entomopathogenic fungi are being developed. However, although spider mites are infected with various Wolbachia strains worldwide, whether this endosymbiont protects them from fungi is as yet unknown. Here, we compared the survival of two populations, treated with antibiotics or naturally harboring different Wolbachia strains, after exposure to the fungal biocontrol agents Metarhizium brunneum and Beauveria bassiana. To control for potential effects of the bacterial community of spider mites, we also compared the susceptibility of two populations naturally uninfected by Wolbachia, treated with antibiotics or not. In one population, Wolbachia‐infected mites had a better survival than uninfected ones in absence of fungi but not in their presence, whereas in the other population Wolbachia increased the mortality induced by B. bassiana. In one naturally Wolbachia‐uninfected population, the antibiotic treatment increased the susceptibility of spider mites to M. brunneum, but it had no effect in the other treatments. These results suggest that natural Wolbachia infections may not hamper and may even improve the success of biological control using entomopathogenic fungi. However, they also draw caution on the generalization of such effects, given the complexity of within‐host–pathogens interaction and the potential eco‐evolutionary consequences of the use of biocontrol agents for Wolbachia‐host associations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7244807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72448072020-06-01 Population‐specific effect of Wolbachia on the cost of fungal infection in spider mites Zélé, Flore Altıntaş, Mustafa Santos, Inês Cakmak, Ibrahim Magalhães, Sara Ecol Evol Original Research Many studies have revealed the ability of the endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia to protect its arthropod hosts against diverse pathogens. However, as Wolbachia may also increase the susceptibility of its host to infection, predicting the outcome of a particular Wolbachia‐host–pathogen interaction remains elusive. Yet, understanding such interactions and their eco‐evolutionary consequences is crucial for disease and pest control strategies. Moreover, how natural Wolbachia infections affect artificially introduced pathogens for biocontrol has never been studied. Tetranychus urticae spider mites are herbivorous crop pests, causing severe damage on numerous economically important crops. Due to the rapid evolution of pesticide resistance, biological control strategies using entomopathogenic fungi are being developed. However, although spider mites are infected with various Wolbachia strains worldwide, whether this endosymbiont protects them from fungi is as yet unknown. Here, we compared the survival of two populations, treated with antibiotics or naturally harboring different Wolbachia strains, after exposure to the fungal biocontrol agents Metarhizium brunneum and Beauveria bassiana. To control for potential effects of the bacterial community of spider mites, we also compared the susceptibility of two populations naturally uninfected by Wolbachia, treated with antibiotics or not. In one population, Wolbachia‐infected mites had a better survival than uninfected ones in absence of fungi but not in their presence, whereas in the other population Wolbachia increased the mortality induced by B. bassiana. In one naturally Wolbachia‐uninfected population, the antibiotic treatment increased the susceptibility of spider mites to M. brunneum, but it had no effect in the other treatments. These results suggest that natural Wolbachia infections may not hamper and may even improve the success of biological control using entomopathogenic fungi. However, they also draw caution on the generalization of such effects, given the complexity of within‐host–pathogens interaction and the potential eco‐evolutionary consequences of the use of biocontrol agents for Wolbachia‐host associations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7244807/ /pubmed/32489617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6015 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zélé, Flore
Altıntaş, Mustafa
Santos, Inês
Cakmak, Ibrahim
Magalhães, Sara
Population‐specific effect of Wolbachia on the cost of fungal infection in spider mites
title Population‐specific effect of Wolbachia on the cost of fungal infection in spider mites
title_full Population‐specific effect of Wolbachia on the cost of fungal infection in spider mites
title_fullStr Population‐specific effect of Wolbachia on the cost of fungal infection in spider mites
title_full_unstemmed Population‐specific effect of Wolbachia on the cost of fungal infection in spider mites
title_short Population‐specific effect of Wolbachia on the cost of fungal infection in spider mites
title_sort population‐specific effect of wolbachia on the cost of fungal infection in spider mites
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7244807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6015
work_keys_str_mv AT zeleflore populationspecificeffectofwolbachiaonthecostoffungalinfectioninspidermites
AT altıntasmustafa populationspecificeffectofwolbachiaonthecostoffungalinfectioninspidermites
AT santosines populationspecificeffectofwolbachiaonthecostoffungalinfectioninspidermites
AT cakmakibrahim populationspecificeffectofwolbachiaonthecostoffungalinfectioninspidermites
AT magalhaessara populationspecificeffectofwolbachiaonthecostoffungalinfectioninspidermites