Cargando…

Polysomes Bypass a 50-Nucleotide Coding Gap Less Efficiently Than Monosomes Due to Attenuation of a 5′ mRNA Stem–Loop and Enhanced Drop-off

Efficient translational bypassing of a 50-nt non-coding gap in a phage T4 topoisomerase subunit gene (gp60) requires several recoding signals. Here we investigate the function of the mRNA stem–loop 5′ of the take-off codon, as well as the importance of ribosome loading density on the mRNA for effici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Loughlin, Sinéad, Capece, Mark C., Klimova, Mariia, Wills, Norma M., Coakley, Arthur, Samatova, Ekaterina, O'Connor, Patrick B.F., Loughran, Gary, Weissman, Jonathan S., Baranov, Pavel V., Rodnina, Marina V., Puglisi, Joseph D., Atkins, John F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32454154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2020.05.010
_version_ 1783537722037633024
author O'Loughlin, Sinéad
Capece, Mark C.
Klimova, Mariia
Wills, Norma M.
Coakley, Arthur
Samatova, Ekaterina
O'Connor, Patrick B.F.
Loughran, Gary
Weissman, Jonathan S.
Baranov, Pavel V.
Rodnina, Marina V.
Puglisi, Joseph D.
Atkins, John F.
author_facet O'Loughlin, Sinéad
Capece, Mark C.
Klimova, Mariia
Wills, Norma M.
Coakley, Arthur
Samatova, Ekaterina
O'Connor, Patrick B.F.
Loughran, Gary
Weissman, Jonathan S.
Baranov, Pavel V.
Rodnina, Marina V.
Puglisi, Joseph D.
Atkins, John F.
author_sort O'Loughlin, Sinéad
collection PubMed
description Efficient translational bypassing of a 50-nt non-coding gap in a phage T4 topoisomerase subunit gene (gp60) requires several recoding signals. Here we investigate the function of the mRNA stem–loop 5′ of the take-off codon, as well as the importance of ribosome loading density on the mRNA for efficient bypassing. We show that polysomes are less efficient at mediating bypassing than monosomes, both in vitro and in vivo, due to their preventing formation of a stem–loop 5′ of the take-off codon and allowing greater peptidyl-tRNA drop off. A ribosome profiling analysis of phage T4-infected Escherichia coli yielded protected mRNA fragments within the normal size range derived from ribosomes stalled at the take-off codon. However, ribosomes at this position also yielded some 53-nucleotide fragments, 16 longer. These were due to protection of the nucleotides that form the 5′ stem–loop. NMR shows that the 5′ stem–loop is highly dynamic. The importance of different nucleotides in the 5′ stem–loop is revealed by mutagenesis studies. These data highlight the significance of the 5′ stem–loop for the 50-nt bypassing and further enhance appreciation of relevance of the extent of ribosome loading for recoding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7245268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72452682020-05-26 Polysomes Bypass a 50-Nucleotide Coding Gap Less Efficiently Than Monosomes Due to Attenuation of a 5′ mRNA Stem–Loop and Enhanced Drop-off O'Loughlin, Sinéad Capece, Mark C. Klimova, Mariia Wills, Norma M. Coakley, Arthur Samatova, Ekaterina O'Connor, Patrick B.F. Loughran, Gary Weissman, Jonathan S. Baranov, Pavel V. Rodnina, Marina V. Puglisi, Joseph D. Atkins, John F. J Mol Biol Article Efficient translational bypassing of a 50-nt non-coding gap in a phage T4 topoisomerase subunit gene (gp60) requires several recoding signals. Here we investigate the function of the mRNA stem–loop 5′ of the take-off codon, as well as the importance of ribosome loading density on the mRNA for efficient bypassing. We show that polysomes are less efficient at mediating bypassing than monosomes, both in vitro and in vivo, due to their preventing formation of a stem–loop 5′ of the take-off codon and allowing greater peptidyl-tRNA drop off. A ribosome profiling analysis of phage T4-infected Escherichia coli yielded protected mRNA fragments within the normal size range derived from ribosomes stalled at the take-off codon. However, ribosomes at this position also yielded some 53-nucleotide fragments, 16 longer. These were due to protection of the nucleotides that form the 5′ stem–loop. NMR shows that the 5′ stem–loop is highly dynamic. The importance of different nucleotides in the 5′ stem–loop is revealed by mutagenesis studies. These data highlight the significance of the 5′ stem–loop for the 50-nt bypassing and further enhance appreciation of relevance of the extent of ribosome loading for recoding. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2020-07-24 2020-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7245268/ /pubmed/32454154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2020.05.010 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
O'Loughlin, Sinéad
Capece, Mark C.
Klimova, Mariia
Wills, Norma M.
Coakley, Arthur
Samatova, Ekaterina
O'Connor, Patrick B.F.
Loughran, Gary
Weissman, Jonathan S.
Baranov, Pavel V.
Rodnina, Marina V.
Puglisi, Joseph D.
Atkins, John F.
Polysomes Bypass a 50-Nucleotide Coding Gap Less Efficiently Than Monosomes Due to Attenuation of a 5′ mRNA Stem–Loop and Enhanced Drop-off
title Polysomes Bypass a 50-Nucleotide Coding Gap Less Efficiently Than Monosomes Due to Attenuation of a 5′ mRNA Stem–Loop and Enhanced Drop-off
title_full Polysomes Bypass a 50-Nucleotide Coding Gap Less Efficiently Than Monosomes Due to Attenuation of a 5′ mRNA Stem–Loop and Enhanced Drop-off
title_fullStr Polysomes Bypass a 50-Nucleotide Coding Gap Less Efficiently Than Monosomes Due to Attenuation of a 5′ mRNA Stem–Loop and Enhanced Drop-off
title_full_unstemmed Polysomes Bypass a 50-Nucleotide Coding Gap Less Efficiently Than Monosomes Due to Attenuation of a 5′ mRNA Stem–Loop and Enhanced Drop-off
title_short Polysomes Bypass a 50-Nucleotide Coding Gap Less Efficiently Than Monosomes Due to Attenuation of a 5′ mRNA Stem–Loop and Enhanced Drop-off
title_sort polysomes bypass a 50-nucleotide coding gap less efficiently than monosomes due to attenuation of a 5′ mrna stem–loop and enhanced drop-off
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32454154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2020.05.010
work_keys_str_mv AT oloughlinsinead polysomesbypassa50nucleotidecodinggaplessefficientlythanmonosomesduetoattenuationofa5mrnastemloopandenhanceddropoff
AT capecemarkc polysomesbypassa50nucleotidecodinggaplessefficientlythanmonosomesduetoattenuationofa5mrnastemloopandenhanceddropoff
AT klimovamariia polysomesbypassa50nucleotidecodinggaplessefficientlythanmonosomesduetoattenuationofa5mrnastemloopandenhanceddropoff
AT willsnormam polysomesbypassa50nucleotidecodinggaplessefficientlythanmonosomesduetoattenuationofa5mrnastemloopandenhanceddropoff
AT coakleyarthur polysomesbypassa50nucleotidecodinggaplessefficientlythanmonosomesduetoattenuationofa5mrnastemloopandenhanceddropoff
AT samatovaekaterina polysomesbypassa50nucleotidecodinggaplessefficientlythanmonosomesduetoattenuationofa5mrnastemloopandenhanceddropoff
AT oconnorpatrickbf polysomesbypassa50nucleotidecodinggaplessefficientlythanmonosomesduetoattenuationofa5mrnastemloopandenhanceddropoff
AT loughrangary polysomesbypassa50nucleotidecodinggaplessefficientlythanmonosomesduetoattenuationofa5mrnastemloopandenhanceddropoff
AT weissmanjonathans polysomesbypassa50nucleotidecodinggaplessefficientlythanmonosomesduetoattenuationofa5mrnastemloopandenhanceddropoff
AT baranovpavelv polysomesbypassa50nucleotidecodinggaplessefficientlythanmonosomesduetoattenuationofa5mrnastemloopandenhanceddropoff
AT rodninamarinav polysomesbypassa50nucleotidecodinggaplessefficientlythanmonosomesduetoattenuationofa5mrnastemloopandenhanceddropoff
AT puglisijosephd polysomesbypassa50nucleotidecodinggaplessefficientlythanmonosomesduetoattenuationofa5mrnastemloopandenhanceddropoff
AT atkinsjohnf polysomesbypassa50nucleotidecodinggaplessefficientlythanmonosomesduetoattenuationofa5mrnastemloopandenhanceddropoff