Cargando…

Single-institute comparison of the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy for oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and stomach adenocarscinoma in a metastatic setting

BACKGROUND: Different approaches are used to treat resectable tumours in patients having adenocarcinoma at the oesophagogastrointestinal junction (EGJ) or in the stomach. However, there is limited information about treatment efficacy for patients at metastatic stage. A recent molecular analysis of u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakayama, Izuma, Takahari, Daisuke, Wakatsuki, Takeru, Osumi, Hiroki, Chin, Keisho, Ogura, Mariko, Sato, Taro, Suzuki, Takeshi, Kamiimabeppu, Daisaku, Ooki, Akira, Suenaga, Mitsukuni, Shinozaki, Eiji, Yamaguchi, Kensei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000595
_version_ 1783537747045122048
author Nakayama, Izuma
Takahari, Daisuke
Wakatsuki, Takeru
Osumi, Hiroki
Chin, Keisho
Ogura, Mariko
Sato, Taro
Suzuki, Takeshi
Kamiimabeppu, Daisaku
Ooki, Akira
Suenaga, Mitsukuni
Shinozaki, Eiji
Yamaguchi, Kensei
author_facet Nakayama, Izuma
Takahari, Daisuke
Wakatsuki, Takeru
Osumi, Hiroki
Chin, Keisho
Ogura, Mariko
Sato, Taro
Suzuki, Takeshi
Kamiimabeppu, Daisaku
Ooki, Akira
Suenaga, Mitsukuni
Shinozaki, Eiji
Yamaguchi, Kensei
author_sort Nakayama, Izuma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Different approaches are used to treat resectable tumours in patients having adenocarcinoma at the oesophagogastrointestinal junction (EGJ) or in the stomach. However, there is limited information about treatment efficacy for patients at metastatic stage. A recent molecular analysis of upper gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinoma revealed that the anatomical location can influence the molecular backgrounds of tumours. This study sought to elucidate whether different therapeutic approaches should be used for EGJ tumours relative to those in the stomach. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institute in Japan. Patients having metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma in the EGJ or stomach who underwent platinum doublet chemotherapy between January 2007 and August 2014 were enrolled. Patients in the EGJ tumour group had tumours having an epicentre within 2 cm proximal or 5 cm distal to the estimated anatomical EGJ and cardia. RESULTS: Among 378 consecutively enrolled patients, 61 were grouped into the EGJ group and the remainder comprised the stomach group. The EGJ group had more men and lower incidence of diffuse type and Borrmann type IV tumours and peritoneum metastasis compared with the stomach group. The median overall survival of patients in the EGJ and stomach groups was similar (17.3 months (95% CI 13.5 to 23.2) vs 14.5 months (95% CI 13.3 to 16.4)). No statistically significant difference was observed in progression-free survival. Although the overall postprogression survival differed significantly between the EGJ and stomach groups (8.2 months (95% CI 5.7 to 12.7) vs 7.1 months (95% CI 6.1 to 7.8)), on grouping patients by histological type, the two groups exhibited similar postprogression survival. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that diffuse-type histology, higher serum CA19-9 levels and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios were independent poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Different clinicopathological features of EGJ adenocarcinoma were not associated with clinical outcomes of platinum doublet chemotherapy. Histological subtype rather than anatomical location has more significance for treatment decisions for advanced gastric cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7245385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72453852020-06-03 Single-institute comparison of the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy for oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and stomach adenocarscinoma in a metastatic setting Nakayama, Izuma Takahari, Daisuke Wakatsuki, Takeru Osumi, Hiroki Chin, Keisho Ogura, Mariko Sato, Taro Suzuki, Takeshi Kamiimabeppu, Daisaku Ooki, Akira Suenaga, Mitsukuni Shinozaki, Eiji Yamaguchi, Kensei ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Different approaches are used to treat resectable tumours in patients having adenocarcinoma at the oesophagogastrointestinal junction (EGJ) or in the stomach. However, there is limited information about treatment efficacy for patients at metastatic stage. A recent molecular analysis of upper gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinoma revealed that the anatomical location can influence the molecular backgrounds of tumours. This study sought to elucidate whether different therapeutic approaches should be used for EGJ tumours relative to those in the stomach. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institute in Japan. Patients having metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma in the EGJ or stomach who underwent platinum doublet chemotherapy between January 2007 and August 2014 were enrolled. Patients in the EGJ tumour group had tumours having an epicentre within 2 cm proximal or 5 cm distal to the estimated anatomical EGJ and cardia. RESULTS: Among 378 consecutively enrolled patients, 61 were grouped into the EGJ group and the remainder comprised the stomach group. The EGJ group had more men and lower incidence of diffuse type and Borrmann type IV tumours and peritoneum metastasis compared with the stomach group. The median overall survival of patients in the EGJ and stomach groups was similar (17.3 months (95% CI 13.5 to 23.2) vs 14.5 months (95% CI 13.3 to 16.4)). No statistically significant difference was observed in progression-free survival. Although the overall postprogression survival differed significantly between the EGJ and stomach groups (8.2 months (95% CI 5.7 to 12.7) vs 7.1 months (95% CI 6.1 to 7.8)), on grouping patients by histological type, the two groups exhibited similar postprogression survival. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that diffuse-type histology, higher serum CA19-9 levels and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios were independent poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Different clinicopathological features of EGJ adenocarcinoma were not associated with clinical outcomes of platinum doublet chemotherapy. Histological subtype rather than anatomical location has more significance for treatment decisions for advanced gastric cancers. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7245385/ /pubmed/32273288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000595 Text en © Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, any changes made are indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nakayama, Izuma
Takahari, Daisuke
Wakatsuki, Takeru
Osumi, Hiroki
Chin, Keisho
Ogura, Mariko
Sato, Taro
Suzuki, Takeshi
Kamiimabeppu, Daisaku
Ooki, Akira
Suenaga, Mitsukuni
Shinozaki, Eiji
Yamaguchi, Kensei
Single-institute comparison of the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy for oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and stomach adenocarscinoma in a metastatic setting
title Single-institute comparison of the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy for oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and stomach adenocarscinoma in a metastatic setting
title_full Single-institute comparison of the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy for oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and stomach adenocarscinoma in a metastatic setting
title_fullStr Single-institute comparison of the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy for oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and stomach adenocarscinoma in a metastatic setting
title_full_unstemmed Single-institute comparison of the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy for oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and stomach adenocarscinoma in a metastatic setting
title_short Single-institute comparison of the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy for oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and stomach adenocarscinoma in a metastatic setting
title_sort single-institute comparison of the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy for oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and stomach adenocarscinoma in a metastatic setting
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000595
work_keys_str_mv AT nakayamaizuma singleinstitutecomparisonoftheefficacyofsystemicchemotherapyforoesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaandstomachadenocarscinomainametastaticsetting
AT takaharidaisuke singleinstitutecomparisonoftheefficacyofsystemicchemotherapyforoesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaandstomachadenocarscinomainametastaticsetting
AT wakatsukitakeru singleinstitutecomparisonoftheefficacyofsystemicchemotherapyforoesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaandstomachadenocarscinomainametastaticsetting
AT osumihiroki singleinstitutecomparisonoftheefficacyofsystemicchemotherapyforoesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaandstomachadenocarscinomainametastaticsetting
AT chinkeisho singleinstitutecomparisonoftheefficacyofsystemicchemotherapyforoesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaandstomachadenocarscinomainametastaticsetting
AT oguramariko singleinstitutecomparisonoftheefficacyofsystemicchemotherapyforoesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaandstomachadenocarscinomainametastaticsetting
AT satotaro singleinstitutecomparisonoftheefficacyofsystemicchemotherapyforoesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaandstomachadenocarscinomainametastaticsetting
AT suzukitakeshi singleinstitutecomparisonoftheefficacyofsystemicchemotherapyforoesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaandstomachadenocarscinomainametastaticsetting
AT kamiimabeppudaisaku singleinstitutecomparisonoftheefficacyofsystemicchemotherapyforoesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaandstomachadenocarscinomainametastaticsetting
AT ookiakira singleinstitutecomparisonoftheefficacyofsystemicchemotherapyforoesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaandstomachadenocarscinomainametastaticsetting
AT suenagamitsukuni singleinstitutecomparisonoftheefficacyofsystemicchemotherapyforoesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaandstomachadenocarscinomainametastaticsetting
AT shinozakieiji singleinstitutecomparisonoftheefficacyofsystemicchemotherapyforoesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaandstomachadenocarscinomainametastaticsetting
AT yamaguchikensei singleinstitutecomparisonoftheefficacyofsystemicchemotherapyforoesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaandstomachadenocarscinomainametastaticsetting