Cargando…

Cohort study evaluating management of burns in the community in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health outcomes, resource use and corresponding costs attributable to managing burns in clinical practice, from initial presentation, among a cohort of adults in the UK. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of the records of a randomly selected cohort of 260 patients from The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guest, Julian F, Fuller, Graham W, Edwards, Jacky
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035345
_version_ 1783537748012957696
author Guest, Julian F
Fuller, Graham W
Edwards, Jacky
author_facet Guest, Julian F
Fuller, Graham W
Edwards, Jacky
author_sort Guest, Julian F
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health outcomes, resource use and corresponding costs attributable to managing burns in clinical practice, from initial presentation, among a cohort of adults in the UK. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of the records of a randomly selected cohort of 260 patients from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database who had 294 evaluable burns. SETTING: Primary and secondary care sectors in the UK. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients’ characteristics, wound-related health outcomes, healthcare resource use and total National Health Service (NHS) cost of patient management. RESULTS: Diagnosis was incomplete in 63% of patients’ records as the location, depth and size of the burns were missing. Overall, 70% of all the burns healed within 24 months and the time to healing was a mean of 7.8 months per burn. Sixty-six per cent of burns were initially managed in the community and the other 34% were managed at accident and emergency departments. Patients’ wounds were subsequently managed predominantly by practice nurses and hospital outpatient clinics. Forty-five per cent of burns had no documented dressings in the patients’ records. The mean NHS cost of wound care in clinical practice over 24 months from initial presentation was an estimated £16 924 per burn, ranging from £12 002 to £40 577 for a healed and unhealed wound, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Due to incomplete documentation in the patients’ records, it is difficult to say whether the time to healing was excessive or what other confounding factors may have contributed to the delayed healing. This study indicates the need for education of general practice clinicians on the management and care of burn wounds. Furthermore, it is beholden on the burns community to determine how the poor healing rates can be improved. Strategies are required to improve documentation in patients’ records, integration of care between different providers, wound healing rates and reducing infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7245389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72453892020-06-03 Cohort study evaluating management of burns in the community in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes Guest, Julian F Fuller, Graham W Edwards, Jacky BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health outcomes, resource use and corresponding costs attributable to managing burns in clinical practice, from initial presentation, among a cohort of adults in the UK. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of the records of a randomly selected cohort of 260 patients from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database who had 294 evaluable burns. SETTING: Primary and secondary care sectors in the UK. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients’ characteristics, wound-related health outcomes, healthcare resource use and total National Health Service (NHS) cost of patient management. RESULTS: Diagnosis was incomplete in 63% of patients’ records as the location, depth and size of the burns were missing. Overall, 70% of all the burns healed within 24 months and the time to healing was a mean of 7.8 months per burn. Sixty-six per cent of burns were initially managed in the community and the other 34% were managed at accident and emergency departments. Patients’ wounds were subsequently managed predominantly by practice nurses and hospital outpatient clinics. Forty-five per cent of burns had no documented dressings in the patients’ records. The mean NHS cost of wound care in clinical practice over 24 months from initial presentation was an estimated £16 924 per burn, ranging from £12 002 to £40 577 for a healed and unhealed wound, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Due to incomplete documentation in the patients’ records, it is difficult to say whether the time to healing was excessive or what other confounding factors may have contributed to the delayed healing. This study indicates the need for education of general practice clinicians on the management and care of burn wounds. Furthermore, it is beholden on the burns community to determine how the poor healing rates can be improved. Strategies are required to improve documentation in patients’ records, integration of care between different providers, wound healing rates and reducing infection. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7245389/ /pubmed/32273318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035345 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Guest, Julian F
Fuller, Graham W
Edwards, Jacky
Cohort study evaluating management of burns in the community in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes
title Cohort study evaluating management of burns in the community in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes
title_full Cohort study evaluating management of burns in the community in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes
title_fullStr Cohort study evaluating management of burns in the community in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Cohort study evaluating management of burns in the community in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes
title_short Cohort study evaluating management of burns in the community in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes
title_sort cohort study evaluating management of burns in the community in clinical practice in the uk: costs and outcomes
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035345
work_keys_str_mv AT guestjulianf cohortstudyevaluatingmanagementofburnsinthecommunityinclinicalpracticeintheukcostsandoutcomes
AT fullergrahamw cohortstudyevaluatingmanagementofburnsinthecommunityinclinicalpracticeintheukcostsandoutcomes
AT edwardsjacky cohortstudyevaluatingmanagementofburnsinthecommunityinclinicalpracticeintheukcostsandoutcomes