Cargando…
Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study
OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality and consistency of intervention development reporting in health research. DESIGN: This was a consensus exercise consisting of two simultaneous and identical three-round e-Delphi studies (one with experts in intervention development and one with wider stakeholders in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033516 |
_version_ | 1783537752554340352 |
---|---|
author | Duncan, Edward O'Cathain, Alicia Rousseau, Nikki Croot, Liz Sworn, Katie Turner, Katrina M Yardley, Lucy Hoddinott, Pat |
author_facet | Duncan, Edward O'Cathain, Alicia Rousseau, Nikki Croot, Liz Sworn, Katie Turner, Katrina M Yardley, Lucy Hoddinott, Pat |
author_sort | Duncan, Edward |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality and consistency of intervention development reporting in health research. DESIGN: This was a consensus exercise consisting of two simultaneous and identical three-round e-Delphi studies (one with experts in intervention development and one with wider stakeholders including funders, journal editors and public involvement members), followed by a consensus workshop. Delphi items were systematically derived from two preceding systematic reviews and a qualitative interview study. PARTICIPANTS: Intervention developers (n=26) and wider stakeholders (n=18) from the UK, North America and Europe participated in separate e-Delphi studies. Intervention developers (n=13) and wider stakeholders (n=13) participated in a 1-day consensus workshop. RESULTS: e-Delphi participants achieved consensus on 15 reporting items. Following feedback from the consensus meeting, the final inclusion and wording of 14 items with description and explanations for each item were agreed. Items focus on context, purpose, target population, approaches, evidence, theory, guiding principles, stakeholder contribution, changes in content or format during the development process, required changes for subgroups, continuing uncertainties, and open access publication. They form the GUIDED (GUIDance for the rEporting of intervention Development) checklist, which contains a description and explanation of each item, alongside examples of good reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus-based reporting guidance for intervention development in health research is now available for publishers and researchers to use. GUIDED has the potential to lead to greater transparency, and enhance quality and improve learning about intervention development research and practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7245409 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72454092020-06-03 Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study Duncan, Edward O'Cathain, Alicia Rousseau, Nikki Croot, Liz Sworn, Katie Turner, Katrina M Yardley, Lucy Hoddinott, Pat BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality and consistency of intervention development reporting in health research. DESIGN: This was a consensus exercise consisting of two simultaneous and identical three-round e-Delphi studies (one with experts in intervention development and one with wider stakeholders including funders, journal editors and public involvement members), followed by a consensus workshop. Delphi items were systematically derived from two preceding systematic reviews and a qualitative interview study. PARTICIPANTS: Intervention developers (n=26) and wider stakeholders (n=18) from the UK, North America and Europe participated in separate e-Delphi studies. Intervention developers (n=13) and wider stakeholders (n=13) participated in a 1-day consensus workshop. RESULTS: e-Delphi participants achieved consensus on 15 reporting items. Following feedback from the consensus meeting, the final inclusion and wording of 14 items with description and explanations for each item were agreed. Items focus on context, purpose, target population, approaches, evidence, theory, guiding principles, stakeholder contribution, changes in content or format during the development process, required changes for subgroups, continuing uncertainties, and open access publication. They form the GUIDED (GUIDance for the rEporting of intervention Development) checklist, which contains a description and explanation of each item, alongside examples of good reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus-based reporting guidance for intervention development in health research is now available for publishers and researchers to use. GUIDED has the potential to lead to greater transparency, and enhance quality and improve learning about intervention development research and practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7245409/ /pubmed/32273313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033516 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Duncan, Edward O'Cathain, Alicia Rousseau, Nikki Croot, Liz Sworn, Katie Turner, Katrina M Yardley, Lucy Hoddinott, Pat Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study |
title | Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study |
title_full | Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study |
title_fullStr | Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study |
title_full_unstemmed | Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study |
title_short | Guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (GUIDED): an evidence-based consensus study |
title_sort | guidance for reporting intervention development studies in health research (guided): an evidence-based consensus study |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033516 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duncanedward guidanceforreportinginterventiondevelopmentstudiesinhealthresearchguidedanevidencebasedconsensusstudy AT ocathainalicia guidanceforreportinginterventiondevelopmentstudiesinhealthresearchguidedanevidencebasedconsensusstudy AT rousseaunikki guidanceforreportinginterventiondevelopmentstudiesinhealthresearchguidedanevidencebasedconsensusstudy AT crootliz guidanceforreportinginterventiondevelopmentstudiesinhealthresearchguidedanevidencebasedconsensusstudy AT swornkatie guidanceforreportinginterventiondevelopmentstudiesinhealthresearchguidedanevidencebasedconsensusstudy AT turnerkatrinam guidanceforreportinginterventiondevelopmentstudiesinhealthresearchguidedanevidencebasedconsensusstudy AT yardleylucy guidanceforreportinginterventiondevelopmentstudiesinhealthresearchguidedanevidencebasedconsensusstudy AT hoddinottpat guidanceforreportinginterventiondevelopmentstudiesinhealthresearchguidedanevidencebasedconsensusstudy |