Cargando…

Community Health Care Workers’ Experiences on Enacting Policy on Technology with Citizens with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia

PURPOSE: Assistive technologies and digitalization of services are promoted through health policy as key means to manage community care obligations efficiently, and to enable older community care recipients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia (D) to remain at home for longer. The overa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holthe, Torhild, Halvorsrud, Liv, Thorstensen, Erik, Karterud, Dag, Laliberte Rudman, Debbie, Lund, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547050
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S246180
_version_ 1783537762447654912
author Holthe, Torhild
Halvorsrud, Liv
Thorstensen, Erik
Karterud, Dag
Laliberte Rudman, Debbie
Lund, Anne
author_facet Holthe, Torhild
Halvorsrud, Liv
Thorstensen, Erik
Karterud, Dag
Laliberte Rudman, Debbie
Lund, Anne
author_sort Holthe, Torhild
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Assistive technologies and digitalization of services are promoted through health policy as key means to manage community care obligations efficiently, and to enable older community care recipients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia (D) to remain at home for longer. The overall aim of this paper is to explore how community health care workers enacted current policy on technology with home-dwelling citizens with MCI/D. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four community health care workers participated in one of five focus group discussions that explored their experiences and current practices with technologies for citizens with MCI/D. Five researchers took part in the focus groups, while six researchers collaboratively conducted an inductive, thematic analysis according to Braun & Clarke. RESULTS: Two main themes with sub-themes were identified: 1) Current and future potentials of technology; i) frequently used technology, ii) cost-effectiveness and iii) “be there” for social contact and 2) Barriers to implement technologies; i) unsystematic approaches and contested responsibility, ii) knowledge and training and iii) technology in relation to user-friendliness and citizen capacities. CONCLUSION: This study revealed the complexity of implementing policy aims regarding technology provision for citizens with MCI/D. By use of Lipsky’s theory on street-level bureaucracy, we shed light on how community health care workers were situated between policies and the everyday lives of citizens with MCI/D, and how their perceived lack of knowledge and practical experiences influenced their exercise of professional discretion in enacting policy on technology in community health care services. Overall, addressing systematic technology approaches was not part of routine care, which may contribute to inequities in provision of technologies to enhance occupational possibilities and meaningful activities in everyday lives of citizens with MCI/D. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NSD project number 47996.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7245453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72454532020-06-15 Community Health Care Workers’ Experiences on Enacting Policy on Technology with Citizens with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia Holthe, Torhild Halvorsrud, Liv Thorstensen, Erik Karterud, Dag Laliberte Rudman, Debbie Lund, Anne J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research PURPOSE: Assistive technologies and digitalization of services are promoted through health policy as key means to manage community care obligations efficiently, and to enable older community care recipients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia (D) to remain at home for longer. The overall aim of this paper is to explore how community health care workers enacted current policy on technology with home-dwelling citizens with MCI/D. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four community health care workers participated in one of five focus group discussions that explored their experiences and current practices with technologies for citizens with MCI/D. Five researchers took part in the focus groups, while six researchers collaboratively conducted an inductive, thematic analysis according to Braun & Clarke. RESULTS: Two main themes with sub-themes were identified: 1) Current and future potentials of technology; i) frequently used technology, ii) cost-effectiveness and iii) “be there” for social contact and 2) Barriers to implement technologies; i) unsystematic approaches and contested responsibility, ii) knowledge and training and iii) technology in relation to user-friendliness and citizen capacities. CONCLUSION: This study revealed the complexity of implementing policy aims regarding technology provision for citizens with MCI/D. By use of Lipsky’s theory on street-level bureaucracy, we shed light on how community health care workers were situated between policies and the everyday lives of citizens with MCI/D, and how their perceived lack of knowledge and practical experiences influenced their exercise of professional discretion in enacting policy on technology in community health care services. Overall, addressing systematic technology approaches was not part of routine care, which may contribute to inequities in provision of technologies to enhance occupational possibilities and meaningful activities in everyday lives of citizens with MCI/D. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NSD project number 47996. Dove 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7245453/ /pubmed/32547050 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S246180 Text en © 2020 Holthe et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Holthe, Torhild
Halvorsrud, Liv
Thorstensen, Erik
Karterud, Dag
Laliberte Rudman, Debbie
Lund, Anne
Community Health Care Workers’ Experiences on Enacting Policy on Technology with Citizens with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
title Community Health Care Workers’ Experiences on Enacting Policy on Technology with Citizens with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
title_full Community Health Care Workers’ Experiences on Enacting Policy on Technology with Citizens with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
title_fullStr Community Health Care Workers’ Experiences on Enacting Policy on Technology with Citizens with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
title_full_unstemmed Community Health Care Workers’ Experiences on Enacting Policy on Technology with Citizens with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
title_short Community Health Care Workers’ Experiences on Enacting Policy on Technology with Citizens with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
title_sort community health care workers’ experiences on enacting policy on technology with citizens with mild cognitive impairment and dementia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547050
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S246180
work_keys_str_mv AT holthetorhild communityhealthcareworkersexperiencesonenactingpolicyontechnologywithcitizenswithmildcognitiveimpairmentanddementia
AT halvorsrudliv communityhealthcareworkersexperiencesonenactingpolicyontechnologywithcitizenswithmildcognitiveimpairmentanddementia
AT thorstensenerik communityhealthcareworkersexperiencesonenactingpolicyontechnologywithcitizenswithmildcognitiveimpairmentanddementia
AT karteruddag communityhealthcareworkersexperiencesonenactingpolicyontechnologywithcitizenswithmildcognitiveimpairmentanddementia
AT laliberterudmandebbie communityhealthcareworkersexperiencesonenactingpolicyontechnologywithcitizenswithmildcognitiveimpairmentanddementia
AT lundanne communityhealthcareworkersexperiencesonenactingpolicyontechnologywithcitizenswithmildcognitiveimpairmentanddementia