Cargando…
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: After esophagectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy (S + CT) and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (S + CRT) can improve survival in patients with node-positive resectable esophageal cancer. However, we are not aware of any studies that directly compared these adjuvant treatments. This study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32448253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01557-9 |
_version_ | 1783537816137891840 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Qifeng Lang, Jinyi Li, Tao Peng, Lin Dai, Wei Jiang, Yinchun Xie, Tianpeng Fang, Qiang Wang, Yi Wu, Lei Cao, Bangrong Han, Yongtao |
author_facet | Wang, Qifeng Lang, Jinyi Li, Tao Peng, Lin Dai, Wei Jiang, Yinchun Xie, Tianpeng Fang, Qiang Wang, Yi Wu, Lei Cao, Bangrong Han, Yongtao |
author_sort | Wang, Qifeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: After esophagectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy (S + CT) and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (S + CRT) can improve survival in patients with node-positive resectable esophageal cancer. However, we are not aware of any studies that directly compared these adjuvant treatments. This study aimed to compare S + CT and S + CRT for patients with esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent S + CT or S + CRT at Sichuan Cancer Hospital during 2008–2017. The patients’ characteristics were compared, as well as their overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to create balanced patient groups according to adjuvant treatment, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors that predicted the survival outcomes. RESULTS: The 859 eligible patients underwent S + CRT (250 patients, 29.1%) or S + CT (609 patients, 70.9%). After propensity score matching (247 patients per group), the 5-year OS rates were 41.8% for S + CRT and 26.8% for S + CT (p = 0.028), and the 5-year DFS rates were 37.2% for S + CRT and 25.5% for S + CT (p = 0.012). Multivariate Cox regression analysis of the matched samples revealed that, relative to the S + CT group, the S + CRT group had better OS (hazard ratio: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56–0.91; p = 0.006) and DFS (hazard ratio: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56–0.88; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Among patients with node-positive resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, S + CRT was associated with better OS than S + CT. A multicenter randomized clinical trial is warranted to confirm these findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7245784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72457842020-06-01 Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis Wang, Qifeng Lang, Jinyi Li, Tao Peng, Lin Dai, Wei Jiang, Yinchun Xie, Tianpeng Fang, Qiang Wang, Yi Wu, Lei Cao, Bangrong Han, Yongtao Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: After esophagectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy (S + CT) and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (S + CRT) can improve survival in patients with node-positive resectable esophageal cancer. However, we are not aware of any studies that directly compared these adjuvant treatments. This study aimed to compare S + CT and S + CRT for patients with esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent S + CT or S + CRT at Sichuan Cancer Hospital during 2008–2017. The patients’ characteristics were compared, as well as their overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to create balanced patient groups according to adjuvant treatment, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors that predicted the survival outcomes. RESULTS: The 859 eligible patients underwent S + CRT (250 patients, 29.1%) or S + CT (609 patients, 70.9%). After propensity score matching (247 patients per group), the 5-year OS rates were 41.8% for S + CRT and 26.8% for S + CT (p = 0.028), and the 5-year DFS rates were 37.2% for S + CRT and 25.5% for S + CT (p = 0.012). Multivariate Cox regression analysis of the matched samples revealed that, relative to the S + CT group, the S + CRT group had better OS (hazard ratio: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56–0.91; p = 0.006) and DFS (hazard ratio: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56–0.88; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Among patients with node-positive resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, S + CRT was associated with better OS than S + CT. A multicenter randomized clinical trial is warranted to confirm these findings. BioMed Central 2020-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7245784/ /pubmed/32448253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01557-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wang, Qifeng Lang, Jinyi Li, Tao Peng, Lin Dai, Wei Jiang, Yinchun Xie, Tianpeng Fang, Qiang Wang, Yi Wu, Lei Cao, Bangrong Han, Yongtao Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title | Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_full | Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_fullStr | Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_short | Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis |
title_sort | postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32448253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01557-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangqifeng postoperativeadjuvantchemotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyfornodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT langjinyi postoperativeadjuvantchemotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyfornodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT litao postoperativeadjuvantchemotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyfornodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT penglin postoperativeadjuvantchemotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyfornodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT daiwei postoperativeadjuvantchemotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyfornodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT jiangyinchun postoperativeadjuvantchemotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyfornodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT xietianpeng postoperativeadjuvantchemotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyfornodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT fangqiang postoperativeadjuvantchemotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyfornodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT wangyi postoperativeadjuvantchemotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyfornodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT wulei postoperativeadjuvantchemotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyfornodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT caobangrong postoperativeadjuvantchemotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyfornodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT hanyongtao postoperativeadjuvantchemotherapyversuschemoradiotherapyfornodepositiveesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis |