Cargando…

Implementation and comparison of two text mining methods with a standard pharmacovigilance method for signal detection of medication errors

BACKGROUND: Medication errors have been identified as the most common preventable cause of adverse events. The lack of granularity in medication error terminology has led pharmacovigilance experts to rely on information in individual case safety reports’ (ICSRs) codes and narratives for signal detec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eskildsen, Nadine Kadi, Eriksson, Robert, Christensen, Sten B., Aghassipour, Tamilla Stine, Bygsø, Mikael Juul, Brunak, Søren, Hansen, Suzanne Lisbet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32448248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1097-0
_version_ 1783537821625090048
author Eskildsen, Nadine Kadi
Eriksson, Robert
Christensen, Sten B.
Aghassipour, Tamilla Stine
Bygsø, Mikael Juul
Brunak, Søren
Hansen, Suzanne Lisbet
author_facet Eskildsen, Nadine Kadi
Eriksson, Robert
Christensen, Sten B.
Aghassipour, Tamilla Stine
Bygsø, Mikael Juul
Brunak, Søren
Hansen, Suzanne Lisbet
author_sort Eskildsen, Nadine Kadi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medication errors have been identified as the most common preventable cause of adverse events. The lack of granularity in medication error terminology has led pharmacovigilance experts to rely on information in individual case safety reports’ (ICSRs) codes and narratives for signal detection, which is both time consuming and labour intensive. Thus, there is a need for complementary methods for the detection of medication errors from ICSRs. The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of two natural language processing text mining methods as complementary tools to the traditional approach followed by pharmacovigilance experts for medication error signal detection. METHODS: The safety surveillance advisor (SSA) method, I2E text mining and University of Copenhagen Center for Protein Research (CPR) text mining, were evaluated for their ability to extract cases containing a type of medication error where patients extracted insulin from a prefilled pen or cartridge by a syringe. A total of 154,209 ICSRs were retrieved from Novo Nordisk’s safety database from January 1987 to February 2018. Each method was evaluated by recall (sensitivity) and precision (positive predictive value). RESULTS: We manually annotated 2533 ICSRs to investigate whether these contained the sought medication error. All these ICSRs were then analysed using the three methods. The recall was 90.4, 88.1 and 78.5% for the CPR text mining, the SSA method and the I2E text mining, respectively. Precision was low for all three methods ranging from 3.4% for the SSA method to 1.9 and 1.6% for the CPR and I2E text mining methods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Text mining methods can, with advantage, be used for the detection of complex signals relying on information found in unstructured text (e.g., ICSR narratives) as standardised and both less labour-intensive and time-consuming methods compared to traditional pharmacovigilance methods. The employment of text mining in pharmacovigilance need not be limited to the surveillance of potential medication errors but can be used for the ongoing regulatory requests, e.g., obligations in risk management plans and may thus be utilised broadly for signal detection and ongoing surveillance activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7245808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72458082020-06-01 Implementation and comparison of two text mining methods with a standard pharmacovigilance method for signal detection of medication errors Eskildsen, Nadine Kadi Eriksson, Robert Christensen, Sten B. Aghassipour, Tamilla Stine Bygsø, Mikael Juul Brunak, Søren Hansen, Suzanne Lisbet BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Medication errors have been identified as the most common preventable cause of adverse events. The lack of granularity in medication error terminology has led pharmacovigilance experts to rely on information in individual case safety reports’ (ICSRs) codes and narratives for signal detection, which is both time consuming and labour intensive. Thus, there is a need for complementary methods for the detection of medication errors from ICSRs. The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of two natural language processing text mining methods as complementary tools to the traditional approach followed by pharmacovigilance experts for medication error signal detection. METHODS: The safety surveillance advisor (SSA) method, I2E text mining and University of Copenhagen Center for Protein Research (CPR) text mining, were evaluated for their ability to extract cases containing a type of medication error where patients extracted insulin from a prefilled pen or cartridge by a syringe. A total of 154,209 ICSRs were retrieved from Novo Nordisk’s safety database from January 1987 to February 2018. Each method was evaluated by recall (sensitivity) and precision (positive predictive value). RESULTS: We manually annotated 2533 ICSRs to investigate whether these contained the sought medication error. All these ICSRs were then analysed using the three methods. The recall was 90.4, 88.1 and 78.5% for the CPR text mining, the SSA method and the I2E text mining, respectively. Precision was low for all three methods ranging from 3.4% for the SSA method to 1.9 and 1.6% for the CPR and I2E text mining methods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Text mining methods can, with advantage, be used for the detection of complex signals relying on information found in unstructured text (e.g., ICSR narratives) as standardised and both less labour-intensive and time-consuming methods compared to traditional pharmacovigilance methods. The employment of text mining in pharmacovigilance need not be limited to the surveillance of potential medication errors but can be used for the ongoing regulatory requests, e.g., obligations in risk management plans and may thus be utilised broadly for signal detection and ongoing surveillance activities. BioMed Central 2020-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7245808/ /pubmed/32448248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1097-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eskildsen, Nadine Kadi
Eriksson, Robert
Christensen, Sten B.
Aghassipour, Tamilla Stine
Bygsø, Mikael Juul
Brunak, Søren
Hansen, Suzanne Lisbet
Implementation and comparison of two text mining methods with a standard pharmacovigilance method for signal detection of medication errors
title Implementation and comparison of two text mining methods with a standard pharmacovigilance method for signal detection of medication errors
title_full Implementation and comparison of two text mining methods with a standard pharmacovigilance method for signal detection of medication errors
title_fullStr Implementation and comparison of two text mining methods with a standard pharmacovigilance method for signal detection of medication errors
title_full_unstemmed Implementation and comparison of two text mining methods with a standard pharmacovigilance method for signal detection of medication errors
title_short Implementation and comparison of two text mining methods with a standard pharmacovigilance method for signal detection of medication errors
title_sort implementation and comparison of two text mining methods with a standard pharmacovigilance method for signal detection of medication errors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32448248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1097-0
work_keys_str_mv AT eskildsennadinekadi implementationandcomparisonoftwotextminingmethodswithastandardpharmacovigilancemethodforsignaldetectionofmedicationerrors
AT erikssonrobert implementationandcomparisonoftwotextminingmethodswithastandardpharmacovigilancemethodforsignaldetectionofmedicationerrors
AT christensenstenb implementationandcomparisonoftwotextminingmethodswithastandardpharmacovigilancemethodforsignaldetectionofmedicationerrors
AT aghassipourtamillastine implementationandcomparisonoftwotextminingmethodswithastandardpharmacovigilancemethodforsignaldetectionofmedicationerrors
AT bygsømikaeljuul implementationandcomparisonoftwotextminingmethodswithastandardpharmacovigilancemethodforsignaldetectionofmedicationerrors
AT brunaksøren implementationandcomparisonoftwotextminingmethodswithastandardpharmacovigilancemethodforsignaldetectionofmedicationerrors
AT hansensuzannelisbet implementationandcomparisonoftwotextminingmethodswithastandardpharmacovigilancemethodforsignaldetectionofmedicationerrors