Cargando…

Aspiration-sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic de-roofing in the treatment of renal cysts: which is better?

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical efficiency between aspiration-sclerotherapy (AS) and laparoscopic de-roofing (LD) in the management of renal cysts through meta-analysis of comparative studies. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search was performed by PubMed, MEDLINE, Ovid and Web of Science for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xueling, Cao, Dehong, Han, Peizhen, Ren, Zhengju, Wang, Jia, Wei, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32448166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01832-7
_version_ 1783537838004895744
author Zhang, Xueling
Cao, Dehong
Han, Peizhen
Ren, Zhengju
Wang, Jia
Wei, Qiang
author_facet Zhang, Xueling
Cao, Dehong
Han, Peizhen
Ren, Zhengju
Wang, Jia
Wei, Qiang
author_sort Zhang, Xueling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical efficiency between aspiration-sclerotherapy (AS) and laparoscopic de-roofing (LD) in the management of renal cysts through meta-analysis of comparative studies. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search was performed by PubMed, MEDLINE, Ovid and Web of Science for relevant studies published up to January 2020. The statistical analyses were conducted with Review Manager 5.3.0 and Stata 15.1. The sensitivity analysis was also carried out to confirm the reliability of this Meta-analysis. RESULTS: Our searches of literature generated 6 studies (1547 patients incorporated) comparing AS with LD in the impacts of renal cyst therapy. Of these, 6 studies contained 1106 and 441 patients who were treated with AS and LD, respectively. The outcome of this meta-analysis indicated that LD group was superior in symptomatic successful rate [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.28; 95%Confidence Interval (CI): 0.09 to 0.86; P = 0.03), radiological successful rate (OR: 0.06; 95%CI: 0.02 to 0.15; P < 0.01) and recurrence rate (OR: 6.08; 95%CI: 2.81 to 13.15; p < 0.01). Nevertheless, AS group had shorter treatment time [Mean Difference (MD):-51.10; 95% CI:-73.01 to − 29.20; p < 0.01]. No statistically significant difference was showed in the rate of complications (OR: 3.19; 95% CI: 0.39 to 25.88; P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: In our meta-analysis, LD had higher symptomatic successful rate, radiological successful rate as well as lower recurrence rate than AS, while the treatment time was longer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7245882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72458822020-06-01 Aspiration-sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic de-roofing in the treatment of renal cysts: which is better? Zhang, Xueling Cao, Dehong Han, Peizhen Ren, Zhengju Wang, Jia Wei, Qiang BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical efficiency between aspiration-sclerotherapy (AS) and laparoscopic de-roofing (LD) in the management of renal cysts through meta-analysis of comparative studies. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search was performed by PubMed, MEDLINE, Ovid and Web of Science for relevant studies published up to January 2020. The statistical analyses were conducted with Review Manager 5.3.0 and Stata 15.1. The sensitivity analysis was also carried out to confirm the reliability of this Meta-analysis. RESULTS: Our searches of literature generated 6 studies (1547 patients incorporated) comparing AS with LD in the impacts of renal cyst therapy. Of these, 6 studies contained 1106 and 441 patients who were treated with AS and LD, respectively. The outcome of this meta-analysis indicated that LD group was superior in symptomatic successful rate [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.28; 95%Confidence Interval (CI): 0.09 to 0.86; P = 0.03), radiological successful rate (OR: 0.06; 95%CI: 0.02 to 0.15; P < 0.01) and recurrence rate (OR: 6.08; 95%CI: 2.81 to 13.15; p < 0.01). Nevertheless, AS group had shorter treatment time [Mean Difference (MD):-51.10; 95% CI:-73.01 to − 29.20; p < 0.01]. No statistically significant difference was showed in the rate of complications (OR: 3.19; 95% CI: 0.39 to 25.88; P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: In our meta-analysis, LD had higher symptomatic successful rate, radiological successful rate as well as lower recurrence rate than AS, while the treatment time was longer. BioMed Central 2020-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7245882/ /pubmed/32448166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01832-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Xueling
Cao, Dehong
Han, Peizhen
Ren, Zhengju
Wang, Jia
Wei, Qiang
Aspiration-sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic de-roofing in the treatment of renal cysts: which is better?
title Aspiration-sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic de-roofing in the treatment of renal cysts: which is better?
title_full Aspiration-sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic de-roofing in the treatment of renal cysts: which is better?
title_fullStr Aspiration-sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic de-roofing in the treatment of renal cysts: which is better?
title_full_unstemmed Aspiration-sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic de-roofing in the treatment of renal cysts: which is better?
title_short Aspiration-sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic de-roofing in the treatment of renal cysts: which is better?
title_sort aspiration-sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic de-roofing in the treatment of renal cysts: which is better?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32448166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01832-7
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxueling aspirationsclerotherapyversuslaparoscopicderoofinginthetreatmentofrenalcystswhichisbetter
AT caodehong aspirationsclerotherapyversuslaparoscopicderoofinginthetreatmentofrenalcystswhichisbetter
AT hanpeizhen aspirationsclerotherapyversuslaparoscopicderoofinginthetreatmentofrenalcystswhichisbetter
AT renzhengju aspirationsclerotherapyversuslaparoscopicderoofinginthetreatmentofrenalcystswhichisbetter
AT wangjia aspirationsclerotherapyversuslaparoscopicderoofinginthetreatmentofrenalcystswhichisbetter
AT weiqiang aspirationsclerotherapyversuslaparoscopicderoofinginthetreatmentofrenalcystswhichisbetter