Cargando…

Ultrasound versus manipulation to determine an intercostal space for single-port thoracoscopy surgery: a diagnostic accuracy study

BACKGROUND: Malposition of the intercostal space used for single-port thoracoscopy surgery can lead to problems. This study was to assess the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound in verifying the position of intercostal space. METHODS: A total of 200 patients, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Chenxi, Wang, Jianjun, Ma, Zeheng, Li, Bing, Kang, Kang, Wei, Li, Zhang, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32446300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01870-3
_version_ 1783537841958027264
author Li, Chenxi
Wang, Jianjun
Ma, Zeheng
Li, Bing
Kang, Kang
Wei, Li
Zhang, Wei
author_facet Li, Chenxi
Wang, Jianjun
Ma, Zeheng
Li, Bing
Kang, Kang
Wei, Li
Zhang, Wei
author_sort Li, Chenxi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malposition of the intercostal space used for single-port thoracoscopy surgery can lead to problems. This study was to assess the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound in verifying the position of intercostal space. METHODS: A total of 200 patients, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I or II, who underwent single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy, were enrolled. After the induction of anesthesia, a thoracic team confirmed the incision position. Firstly, the intercostal space was located by a young resident thoracic surgeon by ultrasound. Secondly, the intercostal space was located by an experienced thoracic surgeon by manipulation. Finally, the investigator verified the location of the intercostal space under direct vision through thoracoscopy, which was recognized as standard method. The time required by ultrasound and manipulation were recorded. RESULTS: The inter-relationships between ultrasound and the standard method and between manipulation and the standard method were consistent. Manipulation positioning showed a sensitivity of 90.6% and specificity of 30% while ultrasound positioning showed a sensitivity of 87.1% and specificity of 60%. The specificity of ultrasound positioning was higher than that of manipulation position. The time required by ultrasound was shorter than that required by manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the manipulation method, the ultrasound-guided method could accurately locate the intercostal space. Ultrasound requires less time than manipulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN10722758. Registered 04 June 2019
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7245900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72459002020-06-01 Ultrasound versus manipulation to determine an intercostal space for single-port thoracoscopy surgery: a diagnostic accuracy study Li, Chenxi Wang, Jianjun Ma, Zeheng Li, Bing Kang, Kang Wei, Li Zhang, Wei World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Malposition of the intercostal space used for single-port thoracoscopy surgery can lead to problems. This study was to assess the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound in verifying the position of intercostal space. METHODS: A total of 200 patients, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I or II, who underwent single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy, were enrolled. After the induction of anesthesia, a thoracic team confirmed the incision position. Firstly, the intercostal space was located by a young resident thoracic surgeon by ultrasound. Secondly, the intercostal space was located by an experienced thoracic surgeon by manipulation. Finally, the investigator verified the location of the intercostal space under direct vision through thoracoscopy, which was recognized as standard method. The time required by ultrasound and manipulation were recorded. RESULTS: The inter-relationships between ultrasound and the standard method and between manipulation and the standard method were consistent. Manipulation positioning showed a sensitivity of 90.6% and specificity of 30% while ultrasound positioning showed a sensitivity of 87.1% and specificity of 60%. The specificity of ultrasound positioning was higher than that of manipulation position. The time required by ultrasound was shorter than that required by manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the manipulation method, the ultrasound-guided method could accurately locate the intercostal space. Ultrasound requires less time than manipulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN10722758. Registered 04 June 2019 BioMed Central 2020-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7245900/ /pubmed/32446300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01870-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Chenxi
Wang, Jianjun
Ma, Zeheng
Li, Bing
Kang, Kang
Wei, Li
Zhang, Wei
Ultrasound versus manipulation to determine an intercostal space for single-port thoracoscopy surgery: a diagnostic accuracy study
title Ultrasound versus manipulation to determine an intercostal space for single-port thoracoscopy surgery: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_full Ultrasound versus manipulation to determine an intercostal space for single-port thoracoscopy surgery: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_fullStr Ultrasound versus manipulation to determine an intercostal space for single-port thoracoscopy surgery: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound versus manipulation to determine an intercostal space for single-port thoracoscopy surgery: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_short Ultrasound versus manipulation to determine an intercostal space for single-port thoracoscopy surgery: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_sort ultrasound versus manipulation to determine an intercostal space for single-port thoracoscopy surgery: a diagnostic accuracy study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32446300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01870-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lichenxi ultrasoundversusmanipulationtodetermineanintercostalspaceforsingleportthoracoscopysurgeryadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT wangjianjun ultrasoundversusmanipulationtodetermineanintercostalspaceforsingleportthoracoscopysurgeryadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT mazeheng ultrasoundversusmanipulationtodetermineanintercostalspaceforsingleportthoracoscopysurgeryadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT libing ultrasoundversusmanipulationtodetermineanintercostalspaceforsingleportthoracoscopysurgeryadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT kangkang ultrasoundversusmanipulationtodetermineanintercostalspaceforsingleportthoracoscopysurgeryadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT weili ultrasoundversusmanipulationtodetermineanintercostalspaceforsingleportthoracoscopysurgeryadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT zhangwei ultrasoundversusmanipulationtodetermineanintercostalspaceforsingleportthoracoscopysurgeryadiagnosticaccuracystudy