Cargando…

Comparative analysis of enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban in the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism: experience from a tertiary care cancer centre

BACKGROUND: Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. While newer data on use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in treating cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) is promising; its data is still few and inconsistent across literature. We de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faqah, Anadil, Sheikh, Hassan, Bakar, Muhammad Abu, Tayyaab, Fatima, Khawaja, Sahrish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-020-00221-2
_version_ 1783537847719952384
author Faqah, Anadil
Sheikh, Hassan
Bakar, Muhammad Abu
Tayyaab, Fatima
Khawaja, Sahrish
author_facet Faqah, Anadil
Sheikh, Hassan
Bakar, Muhammad Abu
Tayyaab, Fatima
Khawaja, Sahrish
author_sort Faqah, Anadil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. While newer data on use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in treating cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) is promising; its data is still few and inconsistent across literature. We designed the study to assess if rivaroxaban would be an appealing alternate choice to treat CAT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin in cancer patients after developing a symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Baseline patient characteristics and laboratory values were assessed in each arm. Primary efficacy outcome was measured by radiographically confirmed VTE recurrence at different intervals. Primary safety outcome was measured by presence of major and minor bleeding using the ISTH scale. RESULTS: Our study recruited 150 cancer patients with radiologically confirmed DVT and PE; 80 patients were evaluated in enoxaparin arm and 70 patients in rivaroxaban arm. Our results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the incidence of VTE recurrence at 6 months between the enoxaparin and rivaroxaban arm (10% vs 14.2%, p = 0.42). Historically significant risk factors for VTE in cancer patients such as high platelet count, high leukocyte count, low hemoglobin level, high risk gastrointestinal, genitourinary and lung cancers were not found to be significantly associated with the risk of VTE recurrence. Primary safety outcome analysis also showed no statistically significant difference in major (11.2% vs 11.4%) and minor (15% vs 10%) bleeding between enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban arm respectively (p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: We conclude that there was no significant difference seen between the efficacy and safety profile of enoxaparin and rivaroxaban in our cancer patient population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7245926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72459262020-06-01 Comparative analysis of enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban in the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism: experience from a tertiary care cancer centre Faqah, Anadil Sheikh, Hassan Bakar, Muhammad Abu Tayyaab, Fatima Khawaja, Sahrish Thromb J Research BACKGROUND: Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. While newer data on use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in treating cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) is promising; its data is still few and inconsistent across literature. We designed the study to assess if rivaroxaban would be an appealing alternate choice to treat CAT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin in cancer patients after developing a symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Baseline patient characteristics and laboratory values were assessed in each arm. Primary efficacy outcome was measured by radiographically confirmed VTE recurrence at different intervals. Primary safety outcome was measured by presence of major and minor bleeding using the ISTH scale. RESULTS: Our study recruited 150 cancer patients with radiologically confirmed DVT and PE; 80 patients were evaluated in enoxaparin arm and 70 patients in rivaroxaban arm. Our results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the incidence of VTE recurrence at 6 months between the enoxaparin and rivaroxaban arm (10% vs 14.2%, p = 0.42). Historically significant risk factors for VTE in cancer patients such as high platelet count, high leukocyte count, low hemoglobin level, high risk gastrointestinal, genitourinary and lung cancers were not found to be significantly associated with the risk of VTE recurrence. Primary safety outcome analysis also showed no statistically significant difference in major (11.2% vs 11.4%) and minor (15% vs 10%) bleeding between enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban arm respectively (p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: We conclude that there was no significant difference seen between the efficacy and safety profile of enoxaparin and rivaroxaban in our cancer patient population. BioMed Central 2020-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7245926/ /pubmed/32489329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-020-00221-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Faqah, Anadil
Sheikh, Hassan
Bakar, Muhammad Abu
Tayyaab, Fatima
Khawaja, Sahrish
Comparative analysis of enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban in the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism: experience from a tertiary care cancer centre
title Comparative analysis of enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban in the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism: experience from a tertiary care cancer centre
title_full Comparative analysis of enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban in the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism: experience from a tertiary care cancer centre
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban in the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism: experience from a tertiary care cancer centre
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban in the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism: experience from a tertiary care cancer centre
title_short Comparative analysis of enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban in the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism: experience from a tertiary care cancer centre
title_sort comparative analysis of enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban in the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism: experience from a tertiary care cancer centre
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-020-00221-2
work_keys_str_mv AT faqahanadil comparativeanalysisofenoxaparinversusrivaroxabaninthetreatmentofcancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismexperiencefromatertiarycarecancercentre
AT sheikhhassan comparativeanalysisofenoxaparinversusrivaroxabaninthetreatmentofcancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismexperiencefromatertiarycarecancercentre
AT bakarmuhammadabu comparativeanalysisofenoxaparinversusrivaroxabaninthetreatmentofcancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismexperiencefromatertiarycarecancercentre
AT tayyaabfatima comparativeanalysisofenoxaparinversusrivaroxabaninthetreatmentofcancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismexperiencefromatertiarycarecancercentre
AT khawajasahrish comparativeanalysisofenoxaparinversusrivaroxabaninthetreatmentofcancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismexperiencefromatertiarycarecancercentre