Cargando…

Efficacy evaluation of 2D, 3D U-Net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi

This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nemoto, Takafumi, Futakami, Natsumi, Yagi, Masamichi, Kumabe, Atsuhiro, Takeda, Atsuya, Kunieda, Etsuo, Shigematsu, Naoyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrz086
_version_ 1783537872641458176
author Nemoto, Takafumi
Futakami, Natsumi
Yagi, Masamichi
Kumabe, Atsuhiro
Takeda, Atsuya
Kunieda, Etsuo
Shigematsu, Naoyuki
author_facet Nemoto, Takafumi
Futakami, Natsumi
Yagi, Masamichi
Kumabe, Atsuhiro
Takeda, Atsuya
Kunieda, Etsuo
Shigematsu, Naoyuki
author_sort Nemoto, Takafumi
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart Segmentation(Ⓡ) Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960–0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7246058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72460582020-05-28 Efficacy evaluation of 2D, 3D U-Net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi Nemoto, Takafumi Futakami, Natsumi Yagi, Masamichi Kumabe, Atsuhiro Takeda, Atsuya Kunieda, Etsuo Shigematsu, Naoyuki J Radiat Res Regular Paper This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart Segmentation(Ⓡ) Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960–0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers. Oxford University Press 2020-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7246058/ /pubmed/32043528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrz086 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Regular Paper
Nemoto, Takafumi
Futakami, Natsumi
Yagi, Masamichi
Kumabe, Atsuhiro
Takeda, Atsuya
Kunieda, Etsuo
Shigematsu, Naoyuki
Efficacy evaluation of 2D, 3D U-Net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi
title Efficacy evaluation of 2D, 3D U-Net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi
title_full Efficacy evaluation of 2D, 3D U-Net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi
title_fullStr Efficacy evaluation of 2D, 3D U-Net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy evaluation of 2D, 3D U-Net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi
title_short Efficacy evaluation of 2D, 3D U-Net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi
title_sort efficacy evaluation of 2d, 3d u-net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi
topic Regular Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrz086
work_keys_str_mv AT nemototakafumi efficacyevaluationof2d3dunetsemanticsegmentationandatlasbasedsegmentationofnormallungsexcludingthetracheaandmainbronchi
AT futakaminatsumi efficacyevaluationof2d3dunetsemanticsegmentationandatlasbasedsegmentationofnormallungsexcludingthetracheaandmainbronchi
AT yagimasamichi efficacyevaluationof2d3dunetsemanticsegmentationandatlasbasedsegmentationofnormallungsexcludingthetracheaandmainbronchi
AT kumabeatsuhiro efficacyevaluationof2d3dunetsemanticsegmentationandatlasbasedsegmentationofnormallungsexcludingthetracheaandmainbronchi
AT takedaatsuya efficacyevaluationof2d3dunetsemanticsegmentationandatlasbasedsegmentationofnormallungsexcludingthetracheaandmainbronchi
AT kuniedaetsuo efficacyevaluationof2d3dunetsemanticsegmentationandatlasbasedsegmentationofnormallungsexcludingthetracheaandmainbronchi
AT shigematsunaoyuki efficacyevaluationof2d3dunetsemanticsegmentationandatlasbasedsegmentationofnormallungsexcludingthetracheaandmainbronchi