Cargando…

Augmented reality and mixed reality for healthcare education beyond surgery: an integrative review

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to review and synthesize the current research and state of augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR) and the applications developed for healthcare education beyond surgery. METHODS: An integrative review was conducted on all relevant material, drawing on different data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerup, Jaris, Soerensen, Camilla B., Dieckmann, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IJME 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31955150
http://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5e01.eb1a
_version_ 1783537885737123840
author Gerup, Jaris
Soerensen, Camilla B.
Dieckmann, Peter
author_facet Gerup, Jaris
Soerensen, Camilla B.
Dieckmann, Peter
author_sort Gerup, Jaris
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to review and synthesize the current research and state of augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR) and the applications developed for healthcare education beyond surgery. METHODS: An integrative review was conducted on all relevant material, drawing on different data sources, including the databases of PubMed, PsycINFO, and ERIC from January 2013 till September 2018. Inductive content analysis and qualitative synthesis were performed. Additionally, the quality of the studies was assessed with different structured tools. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were included. Studies based on both AR and MR involved established applications in 27% of all cases (n=6), the rest being prototypes. The most frequently studied subjects were related to anatomy and anesthesia (n=13). All studies showed several healthcare educational benefits of AR and MR, significantly outperforming traditional learning approaches in 11 studies examining various outcomes. Studies had a low-to-medium quality overall with a MERSQI mean of 12.26 (SD=2.63), while the single qualitative study had high quality. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests the progress of learning approaches based on AR and MR for various medical subjects while moving the research base away from feasibility studies on prototypes. Yet, lacking validity of study conclusions, heterogeneity of research designs and widely varied reporting challenges transferability of the findings in the studies included in the review. Future studies should examine suitable research designs and instructional objectives achievable by AR and MR-based applications to strengthen the evidence base, making it relevant for medical educators and institutions to apply the technologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7246121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher IJME
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72461212020-05-26 Augmented reality and mixed reality for healthcare education beyond surgery: an integrative review Gerup, Jaris Soerensen, Camilla B. Dieckmann, Peter Int J Med Educ Review Literature OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to review and synthesize the current research and state of augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR) and the applications developed for healthcare education beyond surgery. METHODS: An integrative review was conducted on all relevant material, drawing on different data sources, including the databases of PubMed, PsycINFO, and ERIC from January 2013 till September 2018. Inductive content analysis and qualitative synthesis were performed. Additionally, the quality of the studies was assessed with different structured tools. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were included. Studies based on both AR and MR involved established applications in 27% of all cases (n=6), the rest being prototypes. The most frequently studied subjects were related to anatomy and anesthesia (n=13). All studies showed several healthcare educational benefits of AR and MR, significantly outperforming traditional learning approaches in 11 studies examining various outcomes. Studies had a low-to-medium quality overall with a MERSQI mean of 12.26 (SD=2.63), while the single qualitative study had high quality. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests the progress of learning approaches based on AR and MR for various medical subjects while moving the research base away from feasibility studies on prototypes. Yet, lacking validity of study conclusions, heterogeneity of research designs and widely varied reporting challenges transferability of the findings in the studies included in the review. Future studies should examine suitable research designs and instructional objectives achievable by AR and MR-based applications to strengthen the evidence base, making it relevant for medical educators and institutions to apply the technologies. IJME 2020-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7246121/ /pubmed/31955150 http://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5e01.eb1a Text en Copyright: © 2020 Jaris Gerup et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use of work provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Review Literature
Gerup, Jaris
Soerensen, Camilla B.
Dieckmann, Peter
Augmented reality and mixed reality for healthcare education beyond surgery: an integrative review
title Augmented reality and mixed reality for healthcare education beyond surgery: an integrative review
title_full Augmented reality and mixed reality for healthcare education beyond surgery: an integrative review
title_fullStr Augmented reality and mixed reality for healthcare education beyond surgery: an integrative review
title_full_unstemmed Augmented reality and mixed reality for healthcare education beyond surgery: an integrative review
title_short Augmented reality and mixed reality for healthcare education beyond surgery: an integrative review
title_sort augmented reality and mixed reality for healthcare education beyond surgery: an integrative review
topic Review Literature
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31955150
http://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5e01.eb1a
work_keys_str_mv AT gerupjaris augmentedrealityandmixedrealityforhealthcareeducationbeyondsurgeryanintegrativereview
AT soerensencamillab augmentedrealityandmixedrealityforhealthcareeducationbeyondsurgeryanintegrativereview
AT dieckmannpeter augmentedrealityandmixedrealityforhealthcareeducationbeyondsurgeryanintegrativereview