Cargando…

Comparison of knowledge and confidence between medical students as leaders and followers in simulated resuscitation

OBJECTIVES: To compare both the knowledge and self-reported confidence levels between medical students as the team leaders and followers in shock resuscitation simulation training. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with all fifth-year medical students participating in a shock resuscitat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vattanavanit, Veerapong, Khwannimit, Bodin, Nilmoje, Thanapon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IJME 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31971916
http://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5e01.f00c
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To compare both the knowledge and self-reported confidence levels between medical students as the team leaders and followers in shock resuscitation simulation training. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with all fifth-year medical students participating in a shock resuscitation simulation-based training between May 2017 and March 2018. The simulation class was a 3-hour session that consisted of 4 shock type scenarios as well as a post-training debriefing. Medical students were assigned into groups of 4–5 members, in which they freely selected a leader, and the rest filled the roles of followers. Of 139 medical students, 32 students were leaders. A 10-question pre-test and post-test determined knowledge assessment. At the end of the class, the students completed a 5-point Likert scale confidence level evaluation questionnaire. A t-test was applied to compare knowledge scores and confidence levels between the leaders and followers. RESULTS: At the end of the class, the knowledge scores between the leaders (M=6.72, SD=1.51) and followers (M=6.93, SD=1.26) were not different (t((137))= -0.81, p=0.42). In addition, the student confidence levels were also similar between the leaders (M=3.63, SD=0.55) and followers (M=3.41, SD=0.64) after training (t((137))=1.70, p=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge and confidence levels were not different between either the leaders or followers in simulated resuscitation. With time-limit simulation training, we suggested every student may not need to fulfil the leadership role, but a well-designed course and constructive debriefing are recommended. Future studies should evaluate skills and longitudinal effects of the leader role.