Cargando…

Delivery after an obstetric anal sphincter tear

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to assess the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) of a subsequent delivery after the previous OASIS in countries with low (Finland) and high rates (Norway and Sweden) of OASIS. METHODS: This population-based case–control study included women who experie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pirhonen, J., Haadem, K., Gissler, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05550-1
_version_ 1783537902126366720
author Pirhonen, J.
Haadem, K.
Gissler, M.
author_facet Pirhonen, J.
Haadem, K.
Gissler, M.
author_sort Pirhonen, J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The present study aimed to assess the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) of a subsequent delivery after the previous OASIS in countries with low (Finland) and high rates (Norway and Sweden) of OASIS. METHODS: This population-based case–control study included women who experienced OASIS 1997–2002. 26,598 women with OASIS were included from countries with low (Finland) and high (Norway and Sweden) OASIS incidences. Each case was matched with one background-adjusted control without OASIS. A follow-up data, including all subsequent deliveries between 1998 and 2011 were then collected. Statistics significances were calculated using chi-square test, test for relative proportions and Students t test, where appropriate. RESULTS: OASIS in the first birth was associated with increased recurrences in subsequent births, 6.9% vs. 1.7% in Norway (p < 0.001); 4.5% vs. 0.7 (p < 0.001) in Sweden; and 2.1% vs. 0.8% in Finland (p = 0.038). In Norway, more than two deliveries occurred in 4.8% of cases and 6.2% of controls (p = 0.001), 4.2% vs. 5.1% in Sweden (p < 0.001), and 5.7% vs. 6.3% in Finland (p = 0.572). For women with OASIS in a previous delivery, the rates of cesarean deliveries in subsequent pregnancies were 16.4% (7.9% for controls) in Norway, and 16.3% (6.0% for controls) in Sweden, and 50.2% (14.2% for controls) in Finland. In all countries, the differences between cases and controls were significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Next deliveries after OASIS are associated with increased frequency of new OASIS, more cesarean deliveries, and less subsequent deliveries in the high-risk population than women without previous OASIS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7246241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72462412020-06-03 Delivery after an obstetric anal sphincter tear Pirhonen, J. Haadem, K. Gissler, M. Arch Gynecol Obstet General Gynecology PURPOSE: The present study aimed to assess the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) of a subsequent delivery after the previous OASIS in countries with low (Finland) and high rates (Norway and Sweden) of OASIS. METHODS: This population-based case–control study included women who experienced OASIS 1997–2002. 26,598 women with OASIS were included from countries with low (Finland) and high (Norway and Sweden) OASIS incidences. Each case was matched with one background-adjusted control without OASIS. A follow-up data, including all subsequent deliveries between 1998 and 2011 were then collected. Statistics significances were calculated using chi-square test, test for relative proportions and Students t test, where appropriate. RESULTS: OASIS in the first birth was associated with increased recurrences in subsequent births, 6.9% vs. 1.7% in Norway (p < 0.001); 4.5% vs. 0.7 (p < 0.001) in Sweden; and 2.1% vs. 0.8% in Finland (p = 0.038). In Norway, more than two deliveries occurred in 4.8% of cases and 6.2% of controls (p = 0.001), 4.2% vs. 5.1% in Sweden (p < 0.001), and 5.7% vs. 6.3% in Finland (p = 0.572). For women with OASIS in a previous delivery, the rates of cesarean deliveries in subsequent pregnancies were 16.4% (7.9% for controls) in Norway, and 16.3% (6.0% for controls) in Sweden, and 50.2% (14.2% for controls) in Finland. In all countries, the differences between cases and controls were significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Next deliveries after OASIS are associated with increased frequency of new OASIS, more cesarean deliveries, and less subsequent deliveries in the high-risk population than women without previous OASIS. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-04-23 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7246241/ /pubmed/32328710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05550-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle General Gynecology
Pirhonen, J.
Haadem, K.
Gissler, M.
Delivery after an obstetric anal sphincter tear
title Delivery after an obstetric anal sphincter tear
title_full Delivery after an obstetric anal sphincter tear
title_fullStr Delivery after an obstetric anal sphincter tear
title_full_unstemmed Delivery after an obstetric anal sphincter tear
title_short Delivery after an obstetric anal sphincter tear
title_sort delivery after an obstetric anal sphincter tear
topic General Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05550-1
work_keys_str_mv AT pirhonenj deliveryafteranobstetricanalsphinctertear
AT haademk deliveryafteranobstetricanalsphinctertear
AT gisslerm deliveryafteranobstetricanalsphinctertear