Cargando…
A strategy for large-scale comparison of evolutionary- and reaction-based classifications of enzyme function
Determining the molecular function of enzymes discovered by genome sequencing represents a primary foundation for understanding many aspects of biology. Historically, classification of enzyme reactions has used the enzyme nomenclature system developed to describe the overall reactions performed by b...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32449511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baaa034 |
_version_ | 1783537924679139328 |
---|---|
author | Holliday, Gemma L Brown, Shoshana D Mischel, David Polacco, Benjamin J Babbitt, Patricia C |
author_facet | Holliday, Gemma L Brown, Shoshana D Mischel, David Polacco, Benjamin J Babbitt, Patricia C |
author_sort | Holliday, Gemma L |
collection | PubMed |
description | Determining the molecular function of enzymes discovered by genome sequencing represents a primary foundation for understanding many aspects of biology. Historically, classification of enzyme reactions has used the enzyme nomenclature system developed to describe the overall reactions performed by biochemically characterized enzymes, irrespective of their associated sequences. In contrast, functional classification and assignment for the millions of protein sequences of unknown function now available is largely done in two computational steps, first by similarity-based assignment of newly obtained sequences to homologous groups, followed by transferring to them the known functions of similar biochemically characterized homologs. Due to the fundamental differences in their etiologies and practice, `how’ these chemistry- and evolution-centric functional classification systems relate to each other has been difficult to explore on a large scale. To investigate this issue in a new way, we integrated two published ontologies that had previously described each of these classification systems independently. The resulting infrastructure was then used to compare the functional assignments obtained from each classification system for the well-studied and functionally diverse enolase superfamily. Mapping these function assignments to protein structure and reaction similarity networks shows a profound and complex disconnect between the homology- and chemistry-based classification systems. This conclusion mirrors previous observations suggesting that except for closely related sequences, facile annotation transfer from small numbers of characterized enzymes to the huge number uncharacterized homologs to which they are related is problematic. Our extension of these comparisons to large enzyme superfamilies in a computationally intelligent manner provides a foundation for new directions in protein function prediction for the huge proportion of sequences of unknown function represented in major databases. Interactive sequence, reaction, substrate and product similarity networks computed for this work for the enolase and two other superfamilies are freely available for download from the Structure Function Linkage Database Archive (http://sfld.rbvi.ucsf.edu). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7246345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72463452020-05-28 A strategy for large-scale comparison of evolutionary- and reaction-based classifications of enzyme function Holliday, Gemma L Brown, Shoshana D Mischel, David Polacco, Benjamin J Babbitt, Patricia C Database (Oxford) Original Article Determining the molecular function of enzymes discovered by genome sequencing represents a primary foundation for understanding many aspects of biology. Historically, classification of enzyme reactions has used the enzyme nomenclature system developed to describe the overall reactions performed by biochemically characterized enzymes, irrespective of their associated sequences. In contrast, functional classification and assignment for the millions of protein sequences of unknown function now available is largely done in two computational steps, first by similarity-based assignment of newly obtained sequences to homologous groups, followed by transferring to them the known functions of similar biochemically characterized homologs. Due to the fundamental differences in their etiologies and practice, `how’ these chemistry- and evolution-centric functional classification systems relate to each other has been difficult to explore on a large scale. To investigate this issue in a new way, we integrated two published ontologies that had previously described each of these classification systems independently. The resulting infrastructure was then used to compare the functional assignments obtained from each classification system for the well-studied and functionally diverse enolase superfamily. Mapping these function assignments to protein structure and reaction similarity networks shows a profound and complex disconnect between the homology- and chemistry-based classification systems. This conclusion mirrors previous observations suggesting that except for closely related sequences, facile annotation transfer from small numbers of characterized enzymes to the huge number uncharacterized homologs to which they are related is problematic. Our extension of these comparisons to large enzyme superfamilies in a computationally intelligent manner provides a foundation for new directions in protein function prediction for the huge proportion of sequences of unknown function represented in major databases. Interactive sequence, reaction, substrate and product similarity networks computed for this work for the enolase and two other superfamilies are freely available for download from the Structure Function Linkage Database Archive (http://sfld.rbvi.ucsf.edu). Oxford University Press 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7246345/ /pubmed/32449511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baaa034 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Holliday, Gemma L Brown, Shoshana D Mischel, David Polacco, Benjamin J Babbitt, Patricia C A strategy for large-scale comparison of evolutionary- and reaction-based classifications of enzyme function |
title | A strategy for large-scale comparison of evolutionary- and reaction-based classifications of enzyme function |
title_full | A strategy for large-scale comparison of evolutionary- and reaction-based classifications of enzyme function |
title_fullStr | A strategy for large-scale comparison of evolutionary- and reaction-based classifications of enzyme function |
title_full_unstemmed | A strategy for large-scale comparison of evolutionary- and reaction-based classifications of enzyme function |
title_short | A strategy for large-scale comparison of evolutionary- and reaction-based classifications of enzyme function |
title_sort | strategy for large-scale comparison of evolutionary- and reaction-based classifications of enzyme function |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32449511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baaa034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hollidaygemmal astrategyforlargescalecomparisonofevolutionaryandreactionbasedclassificationsofenzymefunction AT brownshoshanad astrategyforlargescalecomparisonofevolutionaryandreactionbasedclassificationsofenzymefunction AT mischeldavid astrategyforlargescalecomparisonofevolutionaryandreactionbasedclassificationsofenzymefunction AT polaccobenjaminj astrategyforlargescalecomparisonofevolutionaryandreactionbasedclassificationsofenzymefunction AT babbittpatriciac astrategyforlargescalecomparisonofevolutionaryandreactionbasedclassificationsofenzymefunction AT hollidaygemmal strategyforlargescalecomparisonofevolutionaryandreactionbasedclassificationsofenzymefunction AT brownshoshanad strategyforlargescalecomparisonofevolutionaryandreactionbasedclassificationsofenzymefunction AT mischeldavid strategyforlargescalecomparisonofevolutionaryandreactionbasedclassificationsofenzymefunction AT polaccobenjaminj strategyforlargescalecomparisonofevolutionaryandreactionbasedclassificationsofenzymefunction AT babbittpatriciac strategyforlargescalecomparisonofevolutionaryandreactionbasedclassificationsofenzymefunction |