Cargando…

Development and Application of One Separation-Free Safety Tube on the Disposable Infusion Needle

OBJECTIVE: To develop a new type infusion set and apply it to the clinic, as well as explore its effectiveness in the prevention from needle stick injuries. METHODS: A total of 200 inpatients who were in need of intravenous infusion with a disposable infusion needle were included and randomly divide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Weifen, Pan, Qianli, Zhou, Yinxin, Chen, Wenyu, Zhang, Hongyan, Qi, Weibo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32508977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6896517
_version_ 1783537935031730176
author Lu, Weifen
Pan, Qianli
Zhou, Yinxin
Chen, Wenyu
Zhang, Hongyan
Qi, Weibo
author_facet Lu, Weifen
Pan, Qianli
Zhou, Yinxin
Chen, Wenyu
Zhang, Hongyan
Qi, Weibo
author_sort Lu, Weifen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop a new type infusion set and apply it to the clinic, as well as explore its effectiveness in the prevention from needle stick injuries. METHODS: A total of 200 inpatients who were in need of intravenous infusion with a disposable infusion needle were included and randomly divided into two groups: intervention group and control group. Disposable infusion needles with a separation-free safety tube were used in the intervention group, whereas conventional ones were used in the control group. Then, effects of the two types of infusion sets were observed and compared. RESULTS: As for the operation time for infusion, it was (82.19 ± 1.80) seconds in the intervention group and (83.02 ± 1.83) seconds in the control group, with the difference statistically significant (P < 0.05). Besides, the exposure time of the needles after infusion in the intervention group was (3.36 ± 0.17) seconds while (18.85 ± 1.18) seconds in the control group; the difference between which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In terms of the time for needle disposal, (18.60 ± 0.84) seconds was required in the intervention group, while for the control group, it took (18.85 ± 1.18) seconds, and the difference between two groups was of statistical significance as well (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference in the accidental slip rate of the needles as that turned out 0% in both groups (P > 0.05). It was worth noting that the block rate of the disposed needles in the intervention group was 100%. CONCLUSION: The separation-free safety tube on the disposable infusion needle could instantly block the sharp needle after infusion, which reduces the needle exposure time and lowers the risk of needle stick injuries. In the meantime, the safety tube is convenient to use, and its application can shorten the time for infusion and needle disposal, consequently improving the working efficiency of nurses. As the new type safety tube has above advantages and would not raise the risk of needle slippage, it is worthy of clinical promotion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7246391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72463912020-06-06 Development and Application of One Separation-Free Safety Tube on the Disposable Infusion Needle Lu, Weifen Pan, Qianli Zhou, Yinxin Chen, Wenyu Zhang, Hongyan Qi, Weibo Comput Math Methods Med Research Article OBJECTIVE: To develop a new type infusion set and apply it to the clinic, as well as explore its effectiveness in the prevention from needle stick injuries. METHODS: A total of 200 inpatients who were in need of intravenous infusion with a disposable infusion needle were included and randomly divided into two groups: intervention group and control group. Disposable infusion needles with a separation-free safety tube were used in the intervention group, whereas conventional ones were used in the control group. Then, effects of the two types of infusion sets were observed and compared. RESULTS: As for the operation time for infusion, it was (82.19 ± 1.80) seconds in the intervention group and (83.02 ± 1.83) seconds in the control group, with the difference statistically significant (P < 0.05). Besides, the exposure time of the needles after infusion in the intervention group was (3.36 ± 0.17) seconds while (18.85 ± 1.18) seconds in the control group; the difference between which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In terms of the time for needle disposal, (18.60 ± 0.84) seconds was required in the intervention group, while for the control group, it took (18.85 ± 1.18) seconds, and the difference between two groups was of statistical significance as well (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference in the accidental slip rate of the needles as that turned out 0% in both groups (P > 0.05). It was worth noting that the block rate of the disposed needles in the intervention group was 100%. CONCLUSION: The separation-free safety tube on the disposable infusion needle could instantly block the sharp needle after infusion, which reduces the needle exposure time and lowers the risk of needle stick injuries. In the meantime, the safety tube is convenient to use, and its application can shorten the time for infusion and needle disposal, consequently improving the working efficiency of nurses. As the new type safety tube has above advantages and would not raise the risk of needle slippage, it is worthy of clinical promotion. Hindawi 2020-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7246391/ /pubmed/32508977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6896517 Text en Copyright © 2020 Weifen Lu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lu, Weifen
Pan, Qianli
Zhou, Yinxin
Chen, Wenyu
Zhang, Hongyan
Qi, Weibo
Development and Application of One Separation-Free Safety Tube on the Disposable Infusion Needle
title Development and Application of One Separation-Free Safety Tube on the Disposable Infusion Needle
title_full Development and Application of One Separation-Free Safety Tube on the Disposable Infusion Needle
title_fullStr Development and Application of One Separation-Free Safety Tube on the Disposable Infusion Needle
title_full_unstemmed Development and Application of One Separation-Free Safety Tube on the Disposable Infusion Needle
title_short Development and Application of One Separation-Free Safety Tube on the Disposable Infusion Needle
title_sort development and application of one separation-free safety tube on the disposable infusion needle
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32508977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6896517
work_keys_str_mv AT luweifen developmentandapplicationofoneseparationfreesafetytubeonthedisposableinfusionneedle
AT panqianli developmentandapplicationofoneseparationfreesafetytubeonthedisposableinfusionneedle
AT zhouyinxin developmentandapplicationofoneseparationfreesafetytubeonthedisposableinfusionneedle
AT chenwenyu developmentandapplicationofoneseparationfreesafetytubeonthedisposableinfusionneedle
AT zhanghongyan developmentandapplicationofoneseparationfreesafetytubeonthedisposableinfusionneedle
AT qiweibo developmentandapplicationofoneseparationfreesafetytubeonthedisposableinfusionneedle