Cargando…
Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar
Impact of photosynthetic and antioxidant capacities on drought tolerance of two closely related forage grasses, Festuca arundinacea and Festuca glaucescens, was deciphered. Within each species, two genotypes distinct in drought tolerance were subjected to a short-term drought, followed by a subseque...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32365894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093174 |
_version_ | 1783537981111402496 |
---|---|
author | Lechowicz, Katarzyna Pawłowicz, Izabela Perlikowski, Dawid Arasimowicz-Jelonek, Magdalena Majka, Joanna Augustyniak, Adam Rapacz, Marcin Kosmala, Arkadiusz |
author_facet | Lechowicz, Katarzyna Pawłowicz, Izabela Perlikowski, Dawid Arasimowicz-Jelonek, Magdalena Majka, Joanna Augustyniak, Adam Rapacz, Marcin Kosmala, Arkadiusz |
author_sort | Lechowicz, Katarzyna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Impact of photosynthetic and antioxidant capacities on drought tolerance of two closely related forage grasses, Festuca arundinacea and Festuca glaucescens, was deciphered. Within each species, two genotypes distinct in drought tolerance were subjected to a short-term drought, followed by a subsequent re-watering. The studies were focused on: (i) analysis of plant physiological performance, including: water uptake, abscisic acid (ABA) content, membrane integrity, gas exchange, and relative water content in leaf tissue; (ii) analysis of plant photosynthetic capacity (chlorophyll fluorescence; gene expression, protein accumulation, and activity of selected enzymes of the Calvin cycle); and (iii) analysis of plant antioxidant capacity (reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation; gene expression, protein accumulation and activity of selected enzymes). Though, F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens revealed different strategies in water uptake, and partially also in ABA signaling, their physiological reactions to drought and further re-watering, were similar. On the other hand, performance of the Calvin cycle and antioxidant system differed between the analyzed species under drought and re-watering periods. A stable efficiency of the Calvin cycle in F. arundinacea was crucial to maintain a balanced network of ROS/redox signaling, and consequently drought tolerance. The antioxidant capacity influenced mostly tolerance to stress in F. glaucescens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7246586 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72465862020-06-10 Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar Lechowicz, Katarzyna Pawłowicz, Izabela Perlikowski, Dawid Arasimowicz-Jelonek, Magdalena Majka, Joanna Augustyniak, Adam Rapacz, Marcin Kosmala, Arkadiusz Int J Mol Sci Article Impact of photosynthetic and antioxidant capacities on drought tolerance of two closely related forage grasses, Festuca arundinacea and Festuca glaucescens, was deciphered. Within each species, two genotypes distinct in drought tolerance were subjected to a short-term drought, followed by a subsequent re-watering. The studies were focused on: (i) analysis of plant physiological performance, including: water uptake, abscisic acid (ABA) content, membrane integrity, gas exchange, and relative water content in leaf tissue; (ii) analysis of plant photosynthetic capacity (chlorophyll fluorescence; gene expression, protein accumulation, and activity of selected enzymes of the Calvin cycle); and (iii) analysis of plant antioxidant capacity (reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation; gene expression, protein accumulation and activity of selected enzymes). Though, F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens revealed different strategies in water uptake, and partially also in ABA signaling, their physiological reactions to drought and further re-watering, were similar. On the other hand, performance of the Calvin cycle and antioxidant system differed between the analyzed species under drought and re-watering periods. A stable efficiency of the Calvin cycle in F. arundinacea was crucial to maintain a balanced network of ROS/redox signaling, and consequently drought tolerance. The antioxidant capacity influenced mostly tolerance to stress in F. glaucescens. MDPI 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7246586/ /pubmed/32365894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093174 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lechowicz, Katarzyna Pawłowicz, Izabela Perlikowski, Dawid Arasimowicz-Jelonek, Magdalena Majka, Joanna Augustyniak, Adam Rapacz, Marcin Kosmala, Arkadiusz Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar |
title | Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar |
title_full | Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar |
title_fullStr | Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar |
title_full_unstemmed | Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar |
title_short | Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar |
title_sort | two festuca species—f. arundinacea and f. glaucescens—differ in the molecular response to drought, while their physiological response is similar |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32365894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lechowiczkatarzyna twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar AT pawłowiczizabela twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar AT perlikowskidawid twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar AT arasimowiczjelonekmagdalena twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar AT majkajoanna twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar AT augustyniakadam twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar AT rapaczmarcin twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar AT kosmalaarkadiusz twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar |