Cargando…

Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar

Impact of photosynthetic and antioxidant capacities on drought tolerance of two closely related forage grasses, Festuca arundinacea and Festuca glaucescens, was deciphered. Within each species, two genotypes distinct in drought tolerance were subjected to a short-term drought, followed by a subseque...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lechowicz, Katarzyna, Pawłowicz, Izabela, Perlikowski, Dawid, Arasimowicz-Jelonek, Magdalena, Majka, Joanna, Augustyniak, Adam, Rapacz, Marcin, Kosmala, Arkadiusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32365894
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093174
_version_ 1783537981111402496
author Lechowicz, Katarzyna
Pawłowicz, Izabela
Perlikowski, Dawid
Arasimowicz-Jelonek, Magdalena
Majka, Joanna
Augustyniak, Adam
Rapacz, Marcin
Kosmala, Arkadiusz
author_facet Lechowicz, Katarzyna
Pawłowicz, Izabela
Perlikowski, Dawid
Arasimowicz-Jelonek, Magdalena
Majka, Joanna
Augustyniak, Adam
Rapacz, Marcin
Kosmala, Arkadiusz
author_sort Lechowicz, Katarzyna
collection PubMed
description Impact of photosynthetic and antioxidant capacities on drought tolerance of two closely related forage grasses, Festuca arundinacea and Festuca glaucescens, was deciphered. Within each species, two genotypes distinct in drought tolerance were subjected to a short-term drought, followed by a subsequent re-watering. The studies were focused on: (i) analysis of plant physiological performance, including: water uptake, abscisic acid (ABA) content, membrane integrity, gas exchange, and relative water content in leaf tissue; (ii) analysis of plant photosynthetic capacity (chlorophyll fluorescence; gene expression, protein accumulation, and activity of selected enzymes of the Calvin cycle); and (iii) analysis of plant antioxidant capacity (reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation; gene expression, protein accumulation and activity of selected enzymes). Though, F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens revealed different strategies in water uptake, and partially also in ABA signaling, their physiological reactions to drought and further re-watering, were similar. On the other hand, performance of the Calvin cycle and antioxidant system differed between the analyzed species under drought and re-watering periods. A stable efficiency of the Calvin cycle in F. arundinacea was crucial to maintain a balanced network of ROS/redox signaling, and consequently drought tolerance. The antioxidant capacity influenced mostly tolerance to stress in F. glaucescens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7246586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72465862020-06-10 Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar Lechowicz, Katarzyna Pawłowicz, Izabela Perlikowski, Dawid Arasimowicz-Jelonek, Magdalena Majka, Joanna Augustyniak, Adam Rapacz, Marcin Kosmala, Arkadiusz Int J Mol Sci Article Impact of photosynthetic and antioxidant capacities on drought tolerance of two closely related forage grasses, Festuca arundinacea and Festuca glaucescens, was deciphered. Within each species, two genotypes distinct in drought tolerance were subjected to a short-term drought, followed by a subsequent re-watering. The studies were focused on: (i) analysis of plant physiological performance, including: water uptake, abscisic acid (ABA) content, membrane integrity, gas exchange, and relative water content in leaf tissue; (ii) analysis of plant photosynthetic capacity (chlorophyll fluorescence; gene expression, protein accumulation, and activity of selected enzymes of the Calvin cycle); and (iii) analysis of plant antioxidant capacity (reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation; gene expression, protein accumulation and activity of selected enzymes). Though, F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens revealed different strategies in water uptake, and partially also in ABA signaling, their physiological reactions to drought and further re-watering, were similar. On the other hand, performance of the Calvin cycle and antioxidant system differed between the analyzed species under drought and re-watering periods. A stable efficiency of the Calvin cycle in F. arundinacea was crucial to maintain a balanced network of ROS/redox signaling, and consequently drought tolerance. The antioxidant capacity influenced mostly tolerance to stress in F. glaucescens. MDPI 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7246586/ /pubmed/32365894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093174 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lechowicz, Katarzyna
Pawłowicz, Izabela
Perlikowski, Dawid
Arasimowicz-Jelonek, Magdalena
Majka, Joanna
Augustyniak, Adam
Rapacz, Marcin
Kosmala, Arkadiusz
Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar
title Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar
title_full Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar
title_fullStr Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar
title_full_unstemmed Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar
title_short Two Festuca Species—F. arundinacea and F. glaucescens—Differ in the Molecular Response to Drought, While Their Physiological Response Is Similar
title_sort two festuca species—f. arundinacea and f. glaucescens—differ in the molecular response to drought, while their physiological response is similar
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32365894
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093174
work_keys_str_mv AT lechowiczkatarzyna twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar
AT pawłowiczizabela twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar
AT perlikowskidawid twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar
AT arasimowiczjelonekmagdalena twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar
AT majkajoanna twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar
AT augustyniakadam twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar
AT rapaczmarcin twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar
AT kosmalaarkadiusz twofestucaspeciesfarundinaceaandfglaucescensdifferinthemolecularresponsetodroughtwhiletheirphysiologicalresponseissimilar