Cargando…

Children Born with Congenital Heart Defects and Growth Restriction at Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Newborns with congenital heart defects tend to have a higher risk of growth restriction, which can be an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes. To date, a systematic review of the relation between congenital heart defects (CHD) and growth restriction at birth, most commonly estimated by its i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghanchi, Ali, Derridj, Neil, Bonnet, Damien, Bertille, Nathalie, Salomon, Laurent J., Khoshnood, Babak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32354021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093056
_version_ 1783538060547325952
author Ghanchi, Ali
Derridj, Neil
Bonnet, Damien
Bertille, Nathalie
Salomon, Laurent J.
Khoshnood, Babak
author_facet Ghanchi, Ali
Derridj, Neil
Bonnet, Damien
Bertille, Nathalie
Salomon, Laurent J.
Khoshnood, Babak
author_sort Ghanchi, Ali
collection PubMed
description Newborns with congenital heart defects tend to have a higher risk of growth restriction, which can be an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes. To date, a systematic review of the relation between congenital heart defects (CHD) and growth restriction at birth, most commonly estimated by its imperfect proxy small for gestational age (SGA), has not been conducted. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the proportion of children born with CHD that are small for gestational age (SGA). Methods: The search was carried out from inception until 31 March 2019 on Pubmed and Embase databases. Studies were screened and selected by two independent reviewers who used a predetermined data extraction form to obtain data from studies. Bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. The database search identified 1783 potentially relevant publications, of which 38 studies were found to be relevant to the study question. A total of 18 studies contained sufficient data for a meta-analysis, which was done using a random effects model. Results: The pooled proportion of SGA in all CHD was 20% (95% CI 16%–24%) and 14% (95% CI 13%–16%) for isolated CHD. Proportion of SGA varied across different CHD ranging from 30% (95% CI 24%–37%) for Tetralogy of Fallot to 12% (95% CI 7%–18%) for isolated atrial septal defect. The majority of studies included in the meta-analysis were population-based studies published after 2010. Conclusion: The overall proportion of SGA in all CHD was 2-fold higher whereas for isolated CHD, 1.4-fold higher than the expected proportion in the general population. Although few studies have looked at SGA for different subtypes of CHD, the observed variability of SGA by subtypes suggests that growth restriction at birth in CHD may be due to different pathophysiological mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7246925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72469252020-06-02 Children Born with Congenital Heart Defects and Growth Restriction at Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Ghanchi, Ali Derridj, Neil Bonnet, Damien Bertille, Nathalie Salomon, Laurent J. Khoshnood, Babak Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Newborns with congenital heart defects tend to have a higher risk of growth restriction, which can be an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes. To date, a systematic review of the relation between congenital heart defects (CHD) and growth restriction at birth, most commonly estimated by its imperfect proxy small for gestational age (SGA), has not been conducted. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the proportion of children born with CHD that are small for gestational age (SGA). Methods: The search was carried out from inception until 31 March 2019 on Pubmed and Embase databases. Studies were screened and selected by two independent reviewers who used a predetermined data extraction form to obtain data from studies. Bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. The database search identified 1783 potentially relevant publications, of which 38 studies were found to be relevant to the study question. A total of 18 studies contained sufficient data for a meta-analysis, which was done using a random effects model. Results: The pooled proportion of SGA in all CHD was 20% (95% CI 16%–24%) and 14% (95% CI 13%–16%) for isolated CHD. Proportion of SGA varied across different CHD ranging from 30% (95% CI 24%–37%) for Tetralogy of Fallot to 12% (95% CI 7%–18%) for isolated atrial septal defect. The majority of studies included in the meta-analysis were population-based studies published after 2010. Conclusion: The overall proportion of SGA in all CHD was 2-fold higher whereas for isolated CHD, 1.4-fold higher than the expected proportion in the general population. Although few studies have looked at SGA for different subtypes of CHD, the observed variability of SGA by subtypes suggests that growth restriction at birth in CHD may be due to different pathophysiological mechanisms. MDPI 2020-04-28 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7246925/ /pubmed/32354021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093056 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ghanchi, Ali
Derridj, Neil
Bonnet, Damien
Bertille, Nathalie
Salomon, Laurent J.
Khoshnood, Babak
Children Born with Congenital Heart Defects and Growth Restriction at Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Children Born with Congenital Heart Defects and Growth Restriction at Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Children Born with Congenital Heart Defects and Growth Restriction at Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Children Born with Congenital Heart Defects and Growth Restriction at Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Children Born with Congenital Heart Defects and Growth Restriction at Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Children Born with Congenital Heart Defects and Growth Restriction at Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort children born with congenital heart defects and growth restriction at birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32354021
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093056
work_keys_str_mv AT ghanchiali childrenbornwithcongenitalheartdefectsandgrowthrestrictionatbirthasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT derridjneil childrenbornwithcongenitalheartdefectsandgrowthrestrictionatbirthasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bonnetdamien childrenbornwithcongenitalheartdefectsandgrowthrestrictionatbirthasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bertillenathalie childrenbornwithcongenitalheartdefectsandgrowthrestrictionatbirthasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT salomonlaurentj childrenbornwithcongenitalheartdefectsandgrowthrestrictionatbirthasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khoshnoodbabak childrenbornwithcongenitalheartdefectsandgrowthrestrictionatbirthasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis