Cargando…

Using an Accelerometer-Based Step Counter in Post-Stroke Patients: Validation of a Low-Cost Tool †

Monitoring the real-life mobility of stroke patients could be extremely useful for clinicians. Step counters are a widely accessible, portable, and cheap technology that can be used to monitor patients in different environments. The aim of this study was to validate a low-cost commercial tri-axial a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Negrini, Francesco, Gasperini, Giulio, Guanziroli, Eleonora, Vitale, Jacopo Antonino, Banfi, Giuseppe, Molteni, Franco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32370210
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093177
_version_ 1783538064587489280
author Negrini, Francesco
Gasperini, Giulio
Guanziroli, Eleonora
Vitale, Jacopo Antonino
Banfi, Giuseppe
Molteni, Franco
author_facet Negrini, Francesco
Gasperini, Giulio
Guanziroli, Eleonora
Vitale, Jacopo Antonino
Banfi, Giuseppe
Molteni, Franco
author_sort Negrini, Francesco
collection PubMed
description Monitoring the real-life mobility of stroke patients could be extremely useful for clinicians. Step counters are a widely accessible, portable, and cheap technology that can be used to monitor patients in different environments. The aim of this study was to validate a low-cost commercial tri-axial accelerometer-based step counter for stroke patients and to determine the best positioning of the step counter (wrists, ankles, and waist). Ten healthy subjects and 43 post-stroke patients were enrolled and performed four validated clinical tests (10 m, 50 m, and 6 min walking tests and timed up and go tests) while wearing five step counters in different positions while a trained operator counted the number of steps executed in each test manually. Data from step counters and those collected manually were compared using the intraclass coefficient correlation and mean average percentage error. The Bland–Altman plot was also used to describe agreement between the two quantitative measurements (step counter vs. manual counting). During walking tests in healthy subjects, the best reliability was found for lower limbs and waist placement (intraclass coefficient correlations (ICCs) from 0.46 to 0.99), and weak reliability was observed for upper limb placement in every test (ICCs from 0.06 to 0.38). On the contrary, in post-stroke patients, moderate reliability was found only for the lower limbs in the 6 min walking test (healthy ankle ICC: 0.69; pathological ankle ICC: 0.70). Furthermore, the Bland–Altman plot highlighted large average discrepancies between methods for the pathological group. However, while the step counter was not able to reliably determine steps for slow patients, when applied to the healthy ankle of patients who walked faster than 0.8 m/s, it counted steps with excellent precision, similar to that seen in the healthy subjects (ICCs from 0.36 to 0.99). These findings show that a low-cost accelerometer-based step counter could be useful for measuring mobility in select high-performance patients and could be used in clinical and real-world settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7246942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72469422020-06-02 Using an Accelerometer-Based Step Counter in Post-Stroke Patients: Validation of a Low-Cost Tool † Negrini, Francesco Gasperini, Giulio Guanziroli, Eleonora Vitale, Jacopo Antonino Banfi, Giuseppe Molteni, Franco Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Monitoring the real-life mobility of stroke patients could be extremely useful for clinicians. Step counters are a widely accessible, portable, and cheap technology that can be used to monitor patients in different environments. The aim of this study was to validate a low-cost commercial tri-axial accelerometer-based step counter for stroke patients and to determine the best positioning of the step counter (wrists, ankles, and waist). Ten healthy subjects and 43 post-stroke patients were enrolled and performed four validated clinical tests (10 m, 50 m, and 6 min walking tests and timed up and go tests) while wearing five step counters in different positions while a trained operator counted the number of steps executed in each test manually. Data from step counters and those collected manually were compared using the intraclass coefficient correlation and mean average percentage error. The Bland–Altman plot was also used to describe agreement between the two quantitative measurements (step counter vs. manual counting). During walking tests in healthy subjects, the best reliability was found for lower limbs and waist placement (intraclass coefficient correlations (ICCs) from 0.46 to 0.99), and weak reliability was observed for upper limb placement in every test (ICCs from 0.06 to 0.38). On the contrary, in post-stroke patients, moderate reliability was found only for the lower limbs in the 6 min walking test (healthy ankle ICC: 0.69; pathological ankle ICC: 0.70). Furthermore, the Bland–Altman plot highlighted large average discrepancies between methods for the pathological group. However, while the step counter was not able to reliably determine steps for slow patients, when applied to the healthy ankle of patients who walked faster than 0.8 m/s, it counted steps with excellent precision, similar to that seen in the healthy subjects (ICCs from 0.36 to 0.99). These findings show that a low-cost accelerometer-based step counter could be useful for measuring mobility in select high-performance patients and could be used in clinical and real-world settings. MDPI 2020-05-02 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7246942/ /pubmed/32370210 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093177 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Negrini, Francesco
Gasperini, Giulio
Guanziroli, Eleonora
Vitale, Jacopo Antonino
Banfi, Giuseppe
Molteni, Franco
Using an Accelerometer-Based Step Counter in Post-Stroke Patients: Validation of a Low-Cost Tool †
title Using an Accelerometer-Based Step Counter in Post-Stroke Patients: Validation of a Low-Cost Tool †
title_full Using an Accelerometer-Based Step Counter in Post-Stroke Patients: Validation of a Low-Cost Tool †
title_fullStr Using an Accelerometer-Based Step Counter in Post-Stroke Patients: Validation of a Low-Cost Tool †
title_full_unstemmed Using an Accelerometer-Based Step Counter in Post-Stroke Patients: Validation of a Low-Cost Tool †
title_short Using an Accelerometer-Based Step Counter in Post-Stroke Patients: Validation of a Low-Cost Tool †
title_sort using an accelerometer-based step counter in post-stroke patients: validation of a low-cost tool †
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32370210
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093177
work_keys_str_mv AT negrinifrancesco usinganaccelerometerbasedstepcounterinpoststrokepatientsvalidationofalowcosttool
AT gasperinigiulio usinganaccelerometerbasedstepcounterinpoststrokepatientsvalidationofalowcosttool
AT guanzirolieleonora usinganaccelerometerbasedstepcounterinpoststrokepatientsvalidationofalowcosttool
AT vitalejacopoantonino usinganaccelerometerbasedstepcounterinpoststrokepatientsvalidationofalowcosttool
AT banfigiuseppe usinganaccelerometerbasedstepcounterinpoststrokepatientsvalidationofalowcosttool
AT moltenifranco usinganaccelerometerbasedstepcounterinpoststrokepatientsvalidationofalowcosttool