Cargando…

Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Regular and Moses Modes of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy

Objective: To compare regular and Moses modes of holmium laser lithotripsy during ureteroscopy in terms of fragmentation/pulverization and procedural times in addition to perioperative complications. Patients and Methods: After obtaining ethics approval, a prospective double-blinded randomized trial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibrahim, Ahmed, Elhilali, Mostafa M., Fahmy, Nader, Carrier, Serge, Andonian, Sero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32143552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0695
_version_ 1783538084329029632
author Ibrahim, Ahmed
Elhilali, Mostafa M.
Fahmy, Nader
Carrier, Serge
Andonian, Sero
author_facet Ibrahim, Ahmed
Elhilali, Mostafa M.
Fahmy, Nader
Carrier, Serge
Andonian, Sero
author_sort Ibrahim, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description Objective: To compare regular and Moses modes of holmium laser lithotripsy during ureteroscopy in terms of fragmentation/pulverization and procedural times in addition to perioperative complications. Patients and Methods: After obtaining ethics approval, a prospective double-blinded randomized trial was conducted for patients undergoing holmium laser lithotripsy during retrograde ureteroscopy. Patients were randomly assigned to either regular or Moses modes. Patients and surgeons were blinded to the laser mode. Lumenis 120W generator with 200 Moses D/F/L fibers were used. Demographic data, stone parameters, perioperative complications, and success rates were compared. The degree of stone retropulsion was graded on a Likert scale from 0—no retropulsion to 3—maximum retropulsion. Results: A total of 72 patients were included in the study (36 per arm). Both groups were comparable in terms of age and preoperative stone size (1.4 cm vs 1.7 cm, p > 0.05). When compared with the regular mode, Moses mode was associated with significantly lower fragmentation/pulverization time (21.1 minutes vs 14.2 minutes; p = 0.03) and procedural time (50.9 minutes vs 41.1 minutes, p = 0.03). However, there were no significant differences in terms of lasing time (7.4 minutes vs 6.1 minutes, p > 0.05) and total energy applied to the stones (11.1 kJ vs 10.8 kJ, p > 0.05). Moses mode was associated with significantly less retropulsion (mean grade was 1.0 vs 0.5, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences between both modes in terms of intraoperative complications (11.1% vs 8.3%, p > 0.05), with one patient requiring endoureterotomy for stricture in the Moses group. Success rate at the end of 3 months was comparable between both groups (83.3% vs 88.4%, p > 0.05). Conclusion: Moses technology was associated with significantly lower fragmentation/pulverization and procedural times. The reduced fragmentation/pulverization time seen using Moses technology could be explained by the significantly lower retropulsion of stones during laser lithotripsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7247036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72470362020-05-26 Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Regular and Moses Modes of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Ibrahim, Ahmed Elhilali, Mostafa M. Fahmy, Nader Carrier, Serge Andonian, Sero J Endourol General Research Objective: To compare regular and Moses modes of holmium laser lithotripsy during ureteroscopy in terms of fragmentation/pulverization and procedural times in addition to perioperative complications. Patients and Methods: After obtaining ethics approval, a prospective double-blinded randomized trial was conducted for patients undergoing holmium laser lithotripsy during retrograde ureteroscopy. Patients were randomly assigned to either regular or Moses modes. Patients and surgeons were blinded to the laser mode. Lumenis 120W generator with 200 Moses D/F/L fibers were used. Demographic data, stone parameters, perioperative complications, and success rates were compared. The degree of stone retropulsion was graded on a Likert scale from 0—no retropulsion to 3—maximum retropulsion. Results: A total of 72 patients were included in the study (36 per arm). Both groups were comparable in terms of age and preoperative stone size (1.4 cm vs 1.7 cm, p > 0.05). When compared with the regular mode, Moses mode was associated with significantly lower fragmentation/pulverization time (21.1 minutes vs 14.2 minutes; p = 0.03) and procedural time (50.9 minutes vs 41.1 minutes, p = 0.03). However, there were no significant differences in terms of lasing time (7.4 minutes vs 6.1 minutes, p > 0.05) and total energy applied to the stones (11.1 kJ vs 10.8 kJ, p > 0.05). Moses mode was associated with significantly less retropulsion (mean grade was 1.0 vs 0.5, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences between both modes in terms of intraoperative complications (11.1% vs 8.3%, p > 0.05), with one patient requiring endoureterotomy for stricture in the Moses group. Success rate at the end of 3 months was comparable between both groups (83.3% vs 88.4%, p > 0.05). Conclusion: Moses technology was associated with significantly lower fragmentation/pulverization and procedural times. The reduced fragmentation/pulverization time seen using Moses technology could be explained by the significantly lower retropulsion of stones during laser lithotripsy. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020-05-01 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7247036/ /pubmed/32143552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0695 Text en © Ahmed Ibrahim, et al. 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle General Research
Ibrahim, Ahmed
Elhilali, Mostafa M.
Fahmy, Nader
Carrier, Serge
Andonian, Sero
Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Regular and Moses Modes of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy
title Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Regular and Moses Modes of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy
title_full Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Regular and Moses Modes of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy
title_fullStr Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Regular and Moses Modes of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy
title_full_unstemmed Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Regular and Moses Modes of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy
title_short Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Regular and Moses Modes of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy
title_sort double-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial comparing regular and moses modes of holmium laser lithotripsy
topic General Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32143552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0695
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimahmed doubleblindedprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingregularandmosesmodesofholmiumlaserlithotripsy
AT elhilalimostafam doubleblindedprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingregularandmosesmodesofholmiumlaserlithotripsy
AT fahmynader doubleblindedprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingregularandmosesmodesofholmiumlaserlithotripsy
AT carrierserge doubleblindedprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingregularandmosesmodesofholmiumlaserlithotripsy
AT andoniansero doubleblindedprospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingregularandmosesmodesofholmiumlaserlithotripsy