Cargando…
Comparison of an automated microfluidic immunoassay technology (BioIC, lab-on-chips) and ImmunoCAP assay. Lab-on-chips as a tool for specific IgE (sIgE) detection
INTRODUCTION: The measurement of clinically important specific IgE (sIgE) antibody is pivotal for both diagnosis and management of allergy. Two methods may be distinguished depending on the number of antigens tested simultaneously: singleplex and multiplex. BioIC is a multiplex, advanced, automated...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32467685 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2020.93383 |
_version_ | 1783538089625387008 |
---|---|
author | Szymczak-Pajor, Izabela Pawliczak, Rafal |
author_facet | Szymczak-Pajor, Izabela Pawliczak, Rafal |
author_sort | Szymczak-Pajor, Izabela |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The measurement of clinically important specific IgE (sIgE) antibody is pivotal for both diagnosis and management of allergy. Two methods may be distinguished depending on the number of antigens tested simultaneously: singleplex and multiplex. BioIC is a multiplex, advanced, automated microfluidic immunoassay system enabling simultaneous sIgE measurement against multiple allergens. ImmunoCAP is a singleplex assay for sIgE detection and gold standard method for diagnosis of allergy. AIM: To compare and validate the diagnostic capability of a multiplex sIgE assay – BioIC assay with a singleplex ImmunoCAP assay. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using both BioIC assay and ImmunoCAP assay, the sIgE level in serum samples from 20 allergic disease patients with respect to 33 allergens (16 inhalant allergens, 16 food allergens and 1 contact allergen) was measured. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC), qualitative and semi-quantitative comparisons were performed to compare both sIgE measurement methods using statistical analyses. RESULTS: ROC AUC analysis showed similar sensitivity and specificity of BioIC assay and ImmunoCAP assay. In qualitative analysis, the negative and positive agreements were 100% equal for each allergen. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients identified very high positive correlations between two assays for all tested allergens (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The BioIC showed agreement with ImmunoCAP assay. Sensitivity and specificity of both assays are similar, thus they showed similar diagnostic performance. However, careful interpretation of obtained results is necessary in clinical applications because of methodological differences between these two systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7247071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72470712020-05-27 Comparison of an automated microfluidic immunoassay technology (BioIC, lab-on-chips) and ImmunoCAP assay. Lab-on-chips as a tool for specific IgE (sIgE) detection Szymczak-Pajor, Izabela Pawliczak, Rafal Postepy Dermatol Alergol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: The measurement of clinically important specific IgE (sIgE) antibody is pivotal for both diagnosis and management of allergy. Two methods may be distinguished depending on the number of antigens tested simultaneously: singleplex and multiplex. BioIC is a multiplex, advanced, automated microfluidic immunoassay system enabling simultaneous sIgE measurement against multiple allergens. ImmunoCAP is a singleplex assay for sIgE detection and gold standard method for diagnosis of allergy. AIM: To compare and validate the diagnostic capability of a multiplex sIgE assay – BioIC assay with a singleplex ImmunoCAP assay. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using both BioIC assay and ImmunoCAP assay, the sIgE level in serum samples from 20 allergic disease patients with respect to 33 allergens (16 inhalant allergens, 16 food allergens and 1 contact allergen) was measured. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC), qualitative and semi-quantitative comparisons were performed to compare both sIgE measurement methods using statistical analyses. RESULTS: ROC AUC analysis showed similar sensitivity and specificity of BioIC assay and ImmunoCAP assay. In qualitative analysis, the negative and positive agreements were 100% equal for each allergen. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients identified very high positive correlations between two assays for all tested allergens (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The BioIC showed agreement with ImmunoCAP assay. Sensitivity and specificity of both assays are similar, thus they showed similar diagnostic performance. However, careful interpretation of obtained results is necessary in clinical applications because of methodological differences between these two systems. Termedia Publishing House 2020-03-09 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7247071/ /pubmed/32467685 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2020.93383 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Szymczak-Pajor, Izabela Pawliczak, Rafal Comparison of an automated microfluidic immunoassay technology (BioIC, lab-on-chips) and ImmunoCAP assay. Lab-on-chips as a tool for specific IgE (sIgE) detection |
title | Comparison of an automated microfluidic immunoassay technology (BioIC, lab-on-chips) and ImmunoCAP assay. Lab-on-chips as a tool for specific IgE (sIgE) detection |
title_full | Comparison of an automated microfluidic immunoassay technology (BioIC, lab-on-chips) and ImmunoCAP assay. Lab-on-chips as a tool for specific IgE (sIgE) detection |
title_fullStr | Comparison of an automated microfluidic immunoassay technology (BioIC, lab-on-chips) and ImmunoCAP assay. Lab-on-chips as a tool for specific IgE (sIgE) detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of an automated microfluidic immunoassay technology (BioIC, lab-on-chips) and ImmunoCAP assay. Lab-on-chips as a tool for specific IgE (sIgE) detection |
title_short | Comparison of an automated microfluidic immunoassay technology (BioIC, lab-on-chips) and ImmunoCAP assay. Lab-on-chips as a tool for specific IgE (sIgE) detection |
title_sort | comparison of an automated microfluidic immunoassay technology (bioic, lab-on-chips) and immunocap assay. lab-on-chips as a tool for specific ige (sige) detection |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32467685 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2020.93383 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szymczakpajorizabela comparisonofanautomatedmicrofluidicimmunoassaytechnologybioiclabonchipsandimmunocapassaylabonchipsasatoolforspecificigesigedetection AT pawliczakrafal comparisonofanautomatedmicrofluidicimmunoassaytechnologybioiclabonchipsandimmunocapassaylabonchipsasatoolforspecificigesigedetection |