Cargando…
Biphasic human insulin 30 thrice daily, is it reasonable?
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrice daily Biphasic Human Insulin 30 (BHI 30) versus the traditional twice-daily regimen in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. It’s a cross over single clinical study. Twenty-two diabetic patients who were already using BHI 30 in twice or th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32448382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05090-6 |
_version_ | 1783538104409260032 |
---|---|
author | Saadeh, Nesreen A. Al-Azzeh, Ola Y. Khader, Yousef S. |
author_facet | Saadeh, Nesreen A. Al-Azzeh, Ola Y. Khader, Yousef S. |
author_sort | Saadeh, Nesreen A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrice daily Biphasic Human Insulin 30 (BHI 30) versus the traditional twice-daily regimen in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. It’s a cross over single clinical study. Twenty-two diabetic patients who were already using BHI 30 in twice or thrice daily regimens with or without metformin were included. At the 1st interval; patients continued on their usual insulin regimen as twice or thrice daily injections with adjustment of insulin doses guided by their glucose readings. On the 2nd interval; patients were switched to the other regimen with the same total daily insulin dose redistributed. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in HbA1c level (p < 0.05) at the end of the first 3 months of trial regardless on which regimen the patient started, but there was no significant difference in the mean HbA1c reduction in patients when they were on twice daily insulin injections (1.1 ± 1.3) versus the time they were on thrice daily insulin injections (0.8 ± 1.71), p > 0.05. On the other hand, patients had lower average blood glucose readings (mg/dl) when they were on thrice daily insulin injections (161.4 ± 62.7) compared to twice daily regimen (166.0 ± 69.5), p < 0.05. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7247174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72471742020-06-01 Biphasic human insulin 30 thrice daily, is it reasonable? Saadeh, Nesreen A. Al-Azzeh, Ola Y. Khader, Yousef S. BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrice daily Biphasic Human Insulin 30 (BHI 30) versus the traditional twice-daily regimen in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. It’s a cross over single clinical study. Twenty-two diabetic patients who were already using BHI 30 in twice or thrice daily regimens with or without metformin were included. At the 1st interval; patients continued on their usual insulin regimen as twice or thrice daily injections with adjustment of insulin doses guided by their glucose readings. On the 2nd interval; patients were switched to the other regimen with the same total daily insulin dose redistributed. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in HbA1c level (p < 0.05) at the end of the first 3 months of trial regardless on which regimen the patient started, but there was no significant difference in the mean HbA1c reduction in patients when they were on twice daily insulin injections (1.1 ± 1.3) versus the time they were on thrice daily insulin injections (0.8 ± 1.71), p > 0.05. On the other hand, patients had lower average blood glucose readings (mg/dl) when they were on thrice daily insulin injections (161.4 ± 62.7) compared to twice daily regimen (166.0 ± 69.5), p < 0.05. BioMed Central 2020-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7247174/ /pubmed/32448382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05090-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Note Saadeh, Nesreen A. Al-Azzeh, Ola Y. Khader, Yousef S. Biphasic human insulin 30 thrice daily, is it reasonable? |
title | Biphasic human insulin 30 thrice daily, is it reasonable? |
title_full | Biphasic human insulin 30 thrice daily, is it reasonable? |
title_fullStr | Biphasic human insulin 30 thrice daily, is it reasonable? |
title_full_unstemmed | Biphasic human insulin 30 thrice daily, is it reasonable? |
title_short | Biphasic human insulin 30 thrice daily, is it reasonable? |
title_sort | biphasic human insulin 30 thrice daily, is it reasonable? |
topic | Research Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32448382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05090-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saadehnesreena biphasichumaninsulin30thricedailyisitreasonable AT alazzeholay biphasichumaninsulin30thricedailyisitreasonable AT khaderyousefs biphasichumaninsulin30thricedailyisitreasonable |