Cargando…
Ernst Haeckel, Nikolai Miklucho-Maclay and the racial controversy over the Papuans
BACKGROUND: The “German Darwin” Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) was a key figure during the first “Darwinian revolution“, a time when the foundations of the modern evolutionary theory were laid. It was Haeckel, who crucially contributed to the visualization of the Darwinian theory by designing “genealogic...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-020-00358-w |
_version_ | 1783538114410577920 |
---|---|
author | Levit, Georgy S. Hossfeld, Uwe |
author_facet | Levit, Georgy S. Hossfeld, Uwe |
author_sort | Levit, Georgy S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The “German Darwin” Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) was a key figure during the first “Darwinian revolution“, a time when the foundations of the modern evolutionary theory were laid. It was Haeckel, who crucially contributed to the visualization of the Darwinian theory by designing “genealogical-trees” illustrating the evolution of various species, including humans. Although the idea of explaining human evolution by natural selection belongs to Darwin, Haeckel was the first who attempted to create a new exact anthropology based on the Darwinian method. DISCUSSION: Trying to immediately reconstruct human evolution proceeding from the description of modern populations led Haeckel to the views which, from the contemporary perspective, are definitely racist. Haeckel created racial anthropology intending to prove human origins from a lower organism, but without the intention of establishing a discriminatory racial praxis. Although hierarchical in its outcome, the Haeckelian method did not presuppose the necessity of a racial hierarchy of currently living humans. It is crucial to grasp in what sense Haeckel’s theoretical explorations in human evolution were racist, and in what sense they were not. Our argument flows as follows. One of Haeckel’s pupils was the Russian ethnographer, anthropologist and zoologist Nikolai Nikolajewitsch Miklucho-Maclay (1846–1888). Maclay and Haeckel worked closely together for several years; they traveled jointly and Maclay had enough time to learn the major methodological principles of Haeckel’s research. Yet in contrast to Haeckel, Maclay is regarded as one of the first scientific anti-racists, who came to anti-racist views using empirical field studies in Papua-New Guinea. CONCLUSIONS: We claim that while conducting these studies Maclay applied scientific principles to a significant extent acquired from Haeckel. The paper contributes to the view that Haeckel’s theoretical racism did not follow the Darwinian method he used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7247218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72472182020-06-01 Ernst Haeckel, Nikolai Miklucho-Maclay and the racial controversy over the Papuans Levit, Georgy S. Hossfeld, Uwe Front Zool Debate BACKGROUND: The “German Darwin” Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) was a key figure during the first “Darwinian revolution“, a time when the foundations of the modern evolutionary theory were laid. It was Haeckel, who crucially contributed to the visualization of the Darwinian theory by designing “genealogical-trees” illustrating the evolution of various species, including humans. Although the idea of explaining human evolution by natural selection belongs to Darwin, Haeckel was the first who attempted to create a new exact anthropology based on the Darwinian method. DISCUSSION: Trying to immediately reconstruct human evolution proceeding from the description of modern populations led Haeckel to the views which, from the contemporary perspective, are definitely racist. Haeckel created racial anthropology intending to prove human origins from a lower organism, but without the intention of establishing a discriminatory racial praxis. Although hierarchical in its outcome, the Haeckelian method did not presuppose the necessity of a racial hierarchy of currently living humans. It is crucial to grasp in what sense Haeckel’s theoretical explorations in human evolution were racist, and in what sense they were not. Our argument flows as follows. One of Haeckel’s pupils was the Russian ethnographer, anthropologist and zoologist Nikolai Nikolajewitsch Miklucho-Maclay (1846–1888). Maclay and Haeckel worked closely together for several years; they traveled jointly and Maclay had enough time to learn the major methodological principles of Haeckel’s research. Yet in contrast to Haeckel, Maclay is regarded as one of the first scientific anti-racists, who came to anti-racist views using empirical field studies in Papua-New Guinea. CONCLUSIONS: We claim that while conducting these studies Maclay applied scientific principles to a significant extent acquired from Haeckel. The paper contributes to the view that Haeckel’s theoretical racism did not follow the Darwinian method he used. BioMed Central 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7247218/ /pubmed/32489391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-020-00358-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Debate Levit, Georgy S. Hossfeld, Uwe Ernst Haeckel, Nikolai Miklucho-Maclay and the racial controversy over the Papuans |
title | Ernst Haeckel, Nikolai Miklucho-Maclay and the racial controversy over the Papuans |
title_full | Ernst Haeckel, Nikolai Miklucho-Maclay and the racial controversy over the Papuans |
title_fullStr | Ernst Haeckel, Nikolai Miklucho-Maclay and the racial controversy over the Papuans |
title_full_unstemmed | Ernst Haeckel, Nikolai Miklucho-Maclay and the racial controversy over the Papuans |
title_short | Ernst Haeckel, Nikolai Miklucho-Maclay and the racial controversy over the Papuans |
title_sort | ernst haeckel, nikolai miklucho-maclay and the racial controversy over the papuans |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-020-00358-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levitgeorgys ernsthaeckelnikolaimikluchomaclayandtheracialcontroversyoverthepapuans AT hossfelduwe ernsthaeckelnikolaimikluchomaclayandtheracialcontroversyoverthepapuans |