Cargando…

Understanding quality systems in the South African prehospital emergency medical services: a multiple exploratory case study

INTRODUCTION: In South Africa (SA), prehospital emergency care is delivered by emergency medical services (EMS) across the country. Within these services, quality systems are in their infancy, and issues regarding transparency, reliability and contextual relevance have been cited as common concerns,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howard, Ian, Cameron, Peter, Wallis, Lee, Castrén, Maaret, Lindström, Veronica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32439739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000946
_version_ 1783538144955596800
author Howard, Ian
Cameron, Peter
Wallis, Lee
Castrén, Maaret
Lindström, Veronica
author_facet Howard, Ian
Cameron, Peter
Wallis, Lee
Castrén, Maaret
Lindström, Veronica
author_sort Howard, Ian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In South Africa (SA), prehospital emergency care is delivered by emergency medical services (EMS) across the country. Within these services, quality systems are in their infancy, and issues regarding transparency, reliability and contextual relevance have been cited as common concerns, exacerbated by poor communication, and ineffective leadership. As a result, we undertook a study to assess the current state of quality systems in EMS in SA, so as to determine priorities for initial focus regarding their development. METHODS: A multiple exploratory case study design was used that employed the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s 18-point Quality Program Assessment Tool as both a formative assessment and semistructured interview guide using four provincial government EMS and one national private service. RESULTS: Services generally scored higher for structure and planning. Measurement and improvement were found to be more dependent on utilisation and perceived mandate. There was a relatively strong focus on clinical quality assessment within the private service, whereas in the provincial systems, measures were exclusively restricted to call times with little focus on clinical care. Staff engagement and programme evaluation were generally among the lowest scores. A multitude of contextual factors were identified that affected the effectiveness of quality systems, centred around leadership, vision and mission, and quality system infrastructure and capacity, guided by the need for comprehensive yet pragmatic strategic policies and standards. CONCLUSION: Understanding and accounting for these factors will be key to ensuring both successful implementation and ongoing utilisation of healthcare quality systems in emergency care. The result will not only provide a more efficient and effective service, but also positively impact patient safety and quality of care of the services delivered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7247383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72473832020-06-03 Understanding quality systems in the South African prehospital emergency medical services: a multiple exploratory case study Howard, Ian Cameron, Peter Wallis, Lee Castrén, Maaret Lindström, Veronica BMJ Open Qual Original Research INTRODUCTION: In South Africa (SA), prehospital emergency care is delivered by emergency medical services (EMS) across the country. Within these services, quality systems are in their infancy, and issues regarding transparency, reliability and contextual relevance have been cited as common concerns, exacerbated by poor communication, and ineffective leadership. As a result, we undertook a study to assess the current state of quality systems in EMS in SA, so as to determine priorities for initial focus regarding their development. METHODS: A multiple exploratory case study design was used that employed the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s 18-point Quality Program Assessment Tool as both a formative assessment and semistructured interview guide using four provincial government EMS and one national private service. RESULTS: Services generally scored higher for structure and planning. Measurement and improvement were found to be more dependent on utilisation and perceived mandate. There was a relatively strong focus on clinical quality assessment within the private service, whereas in the provincial systems, measures were exclusively restricted to call times with little focus on clinical care. Staff engagement and programme evaluation were generally among the lowest scores. A multitude of contextual factors were identified that affected the effectiveness of quality systems, centred around leadership, vision and mission, and quality system infrastructure and capacity, guided by the need for comprehensive yet pragmatic strategic policies and standards. CONCLUSION: Understanding and accounting for these factors will be key to ensuring both successful implementation and ongoing utilisation of healthcare quality systems in emergency care. The result will not only provide a more efficient and effective service, but also positively impact patient safety and quality of care of the services delivered. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7247383/ /pubmed/32439739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000946 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Howard, Ian
Cameron, Peter
Wallis, Lee
Castrén, Maaret
Lindström, Veronica
Understanding quality systems in the South African prehospital emergency medical services: a multiple exploratory case study
title Understanding quality systems in the South African prehospital emergency medical services: a multiple exploratory case study
title_full Understanding quality systems in the South African prehospital emergency medical services: a multiple exploratory case study
title_fullStr Understanding quality systems in the South African prehospital emergency medical services: a multiple exploratory case study
title_full_unstemmed Understanding quality systems in the South African prehospital emergency medical services: a multiple exploratory case study
title_short Understanding quality systems in the South African prehospital emergency medical services: a multiple exploratory case study
title_sort understanding quality systems in the south african prehospital emergency medical services: a multiple exploratory case study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32439739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000946
work_keys_str_mv AT howardian understandingqualitysystemsinthesouthafricanprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesamultipleexploratorycasestudy
AT cameronpeter understandingqualitysystemsinthesouthafricanprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesamultipleexploratorycasestudy
AT wallislee understandingqualitysystemsinthesouthafricanprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesamultipleexploratorycasestudy
AT castrenmaaret understandingqualitysystemsinthesouthafricanprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesamultipleexploratorycasestudy
AT lindstromveronica understandingqualitysystemsinthesouthafricanprehospitalemergencymedicalservicesamultipleexploratorycasestudy