Cargando…

Characterising the evidence base for advanced clinical practice in the UK: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION: A global health workforce crisis, coupled with ageing populations, wars and the rise of non-communicable diseases is prompting all countries to consider the optimal skill mix within their health workforce. The development of advanced clinical practice (ACP) roles for existing non-medic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Catrin, Poku, Brenda, Pearce, Ruth, Eldridge, Jeanette, Hendrick, Paul, Knaggs, Roger, McLuskey, John, Tomczak, Philippa, Thow, Ruaridh, Harris, Peter, Conway, Joy, Collier, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32439696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036192
_version_ 1783538145416970240
author Evans, Catrin
Poku, Brenda
Pearce, Ruth
Eldridge, Jeanette
Hendrick, Paul
Knaggs, Roger
McLuskey, John
Tomczak, Philippa
Thow, Ruaridh
Harris, Peter
Conway, Joy
Collier, Richard
author_facet Evans, Catrin
Poku, Brenda
Pearce, Ruth
Eldridge, Jeanette
Hendrick, Paul
Knaggs, Roger
McLuskey, John
Tomczak, Philippa
Thow, Ruaridh
Harris, Peter
Conway, Joy
Collier, Richard
author_sort Evans, Catrin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A global health workforce crisis, coupled with ageing populations, wars and the rise of non-communicable diseases is prompting all countries to consider the optimal skill mix within their health workforce. The development of advanced clinical practice (ACP) roles for existing non-medical cadres is one potential strategy that is being pursued. In the UK, National Health Service (NHS) workforce transformation programmes are actively promoting the development of ACP roles across a wide range of non-medical professions. These efforts are currently hampered by a high level of variation in ACP role development, deployment, nomenclature, definition, governance and educational preparation across the professions and across different settings. This scoping review aims to support a more consistent approach to workforce development in the UK, by identifying and mapping the current evidence base underpinning multiprofessional advanced level practice in the UK from a workforce, clinical, service and patient perspective. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review is registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/tzpe5). The review will follow Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and involves a multidisciplinary and multiprofessional team, including a public representative. A wide range of electronic databases and grey literature sources will be searched from 2005 to the present. The review will include primary data from any relevant research, audit or evaluation studies. All review steps will involve two or more reviewers. Data extraction, charting and summary will be guided by a template derived from an established framework used internationally to evaluate ACP (the Participatory Evidence-Informed Patient-Centred Process-Plus framework). DISSEMINATION: The review will produce important new information on existing activity, outcomes, implementation challenges and key areas for future research around ACP in the UK, which, in the context of global workforce transformations, will be of international, as well as local, significance. The findings will be disseminated through professional and NHS bodies, employer organisations, conferences and research papers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7247387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72473872020-06-03 Characterising the evidence base for advanced clinical practice in the UK: a scoping review protocol Evans, Catrin Poku, Brenda Pearce, Ruth Eldridge, Jeanette Hendrick, Paul Knaggs, Roger McLuskey, John Tomczak, Philippa Thow, Ruaridh Harris, Peter Conway, Joy Collier, Richard BMJ Open Health Policy INTRODUCTION: A global health workforce crisis, coupled with ageing populations, wars and the rise of non-communicable diseases is prompting all countries to consider the optimal skill mix within their health workforce. The development of advanced clinical practice (ACP) roles for existing non-medical cadres is one potential strategy that is being pursued. In the UK, National Health Service (NHS) workforce transformation programmes are actively promoting the development of ACP roles across a wide range of non-medical professions. These efforts are currently hampered by a high level of variation in ACP role development, deployment, nomenclature, definition, governance and educational preparation across the professions and across different settings. This scoping review aims to support a more consistent approach to workforce development in the UK, by identifying and mapping the current evidence base underpinning multiprofessional advanced level practice in the UK from a workforce, clinical, service and patient perspective. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review is registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/tzpe5). The review will follow Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and involves a multidisciplinary and multiprofessional team, including a public representative. A wide range of electronic databases and grey literature sources will be searched from 2005 to the present. The review will include primary data from any relevant research, audit or evaluation studies. All review steps will involve two or more reviewers. Data extraction, charting and summary will be guided by a template derived from an established framework used internationally to evaluate ACP (the Participatory Evidence-Informed Patient-Centred Process-Plus framework). DISSEMINATION: The review will produce important new information on existing activity, outcomes, implementation challenges and key areas for future research around ACP in the UK, which, in the context of global workforce transformations, will be of international, as well as local, significance. The findings will be disseminated through professional and NHS bodies, employer organisations, conferences and research papers. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7247387/ /pubmed/32439696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036192 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Policy
Evans, Catrin
Poku, Brenda
Pearce, Ruth
Eldridge, Jeanette
Hendrick, Paul
Knaggs, Roger
McLuskey, John
Tomczak, Philippa
Thow, Ruaridh
Harris, Peter
Conway, Joy
Collier, Richard
Characterising the evidence base for advanced clinical practice in the UK: a scoping review protocol
title Characterising the evidence base for advanced clinical practice in the UK: a scoping review protocol
title_full Characterising the evidence base for advanced clinical practice in the UK: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Characterising the evidence base for advanced clinical practice in the UK: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Characterising the evidence base for advanced clinical practice in the UK: a scoping review protocol
title_short Characterising the evidence base for advanced clinical practice in the UK: a scoping review protocol
title_sort characterising the evidence base for advanced clinical practice in the uk: a scoping review protocol
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32439696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036192
work_keys_str_mv AT evanscatrin characterisingtheevidencebaseforadvancedclinicalpracticeintheukascopingreviewprotocol
AT pokubrenda characterisingtheevidencebaseforadvancedclinicalpracticeintheukascopingreviewprotocol
AT pearceruth characterisingtheevidencebaseforadvancedclinicalpracticeintheukascopingreviewprotocol
AT eldridgejeanette characterisingtheevidencebaseforadvancedclinicalpracticeintheukascopingreviewprotocol
AT hendrickpaul characterisingtheevidencebaseforadvancedclinicalpracticeintheukascopingreviewprotocol
AT knaggsroger characterisingtheevidencebaseforadvancedclinicalpracticeintheukascopingreviewprotocol
AT mcluskeyjohn characterisingtheevidencebaseforadvancedclinicalpracticeintheukascopingreviewprotocol
AT tomczakphilippa characterisingtheevidencebaseforadvancedclinicalpracticeintheukascopingreviewprotocol
AT thowruaridh characterisingtheevidencebaseforadvancedclinicalpracticeintheukascopingreviewprotocol
AT harrispeter characterisingtheevidencebaseforadvancedclinicalpracticeintheukascopingreviewprotocol
AT conwayjoy characterisingtheevidencebaseforadvancedclinicalpracticeintheukascopingreviewprotocol
AT collierrichard characterisingtheevidencebaseforadvancedclinicalpracticeintheukascopingreviewprotocol