Cargando…
“One more time”: why replicating some syntheses of evidence relevant to COVID-19 makes sense
• Given the urgent need for credible answers to high-priority questions about the health and social impacts of COVID-19, many systematic reviewers seek to contribute their skills and expertise. • Rather than embarking on unnecessary, duplicate reviews, we encourage the evidence synthesis community t...
Autores principales: | Page, Matthew J., Welch, Vivian A., Haddaway, Neal R., Karunananthan, Sathya, Maxwell, Lara J., Tugwell, Peter |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32464320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.024 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
por: Page, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Open synthesis and the coronavirus pandemic in 2020
por: Haddaway, Neal R., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
When is systematic review replication useful, and when is it wasteful?
por: Karunananthan, Sathya, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Coronavirus: Why Men are More Vulnerable to Covid-19 Than Women?
por: Bwire, George M.
Publicado: (2020) -
A framework for identifying and mitigating the equity harms of COVID-19 policy interventions
por: Glover, Rebecca E., et al.
Publicado: (2020)