Cargando…

A within-subject comparison of different relaxation therapies in eliciting physiological and psychological changes in young women

BACKGROUND: Stress reactivity can be different in women compared to men, which might consequently influence disease risk.Stress in women may also generate adverse physiological effects on their offspring during pregnancy or lactation. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dib, Sarah, Wells, Jonathan C.K., Fewtrell, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32509467
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9217
_version_ 1783538174477205504
author Dib, Sarah
Wells, Jonathan C.K.
Fewtrell, Mary
author_facet Dib, Sarah
Wells, Jonathan C.K.
Fewtrell, Mary
author_sort Dib, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stress reactivity can be different in women compared to men, which might consequently influence disease risk.Stress in women may also generate adverse physiological effects on their offspring during pregnancy or lactation. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of different relaxation interventions on physiological outcomes and perceived relaxation in healthy young women, to assist in identifying the most appropriate intervention(s) for use in a subsequent trial for mothers who deliver prematurely. METHODS: A within-subject study was conducted in 17 women of reproductive age comparing five different relaxation interventions (guided-imagery meditation audio (GIM), music listening (ML), relaxation lighting (RL), GIM+RL, ML+RL), with control (silence/sitting), assigned in random order over a 3–6 week period. Subjective feelings of relaxation (10-point scale), heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), and fingertip temperature (FT) were measured before and after each technique RESULTS: All interventions significantly increased perceived relaxation and FT, while music also significantly reduced SBP (p < 0.05). Compared to control, HR significantly decreased following GIM (mean difference = 3.2 bpm, p < 0.05), and FT increased (mean difference = 2.2 °C, p < 0.05) and SBP decreased (mean difference = 3.3 mmHg, p < 0.01) following ML. GIM + RL followed by GIM were the most preferred interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Based on preference, simplicity, and the physiological and psychological effects, GIM and ML were identified as the most effective tools for reducing stress and improving relaxation. These techniques warrant further research in larger samples and other populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7247525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72475252020-06-04 A within-subject comparison of different relaxation therapies in eliciting physiological and psychological changes in young women Dib, Sarah Wells, Jonathan C.K. Fewtrell, Mary PeerJ Clinical Trials BACKGROUND: Stress reactivity can be different in women compared to men, which might consequently influence disease risk.Stress in women may also generate adverse physiological effects on their offspring during pregnancy or lactation. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of different relaxation interventions on physiological outcomes and perceived relaxation in healthy young women, to assist in identifying the most appropriate intervention(s) for use in a subsequent trial for mothers who deliver prematurely. METHODS: A within-subject study was conducted in 17 women of reproductive age comparing five different relaxation interventions (guided-imagery meditation audio (GIM), music listening (ML), relaxation lighting (RL), GIM+RL, ML+RL), with control (silence/sitting), assigned in random order over a 3–6 week period. Subjective feelings of relaxation (10-point scale), heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), and fingertip temperature (FT) were measured before and after each technique RESULTS: All interventions significantly increased perceived relaxation and FT, while music also significantly reduced SBP (p < 0.05). Compared to control, HR significantly decreased following GIM (mean difference = 3.2 bpm, p < 0.05), and FT increased (mean difference = 2.2 °C, p < 0.05) and SBP decreased (mean difference = 3.3 mmHg, p < 0.01) following ML. GIM + RL followed by GIM were the most preferred interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Based on preference, simplicity, and the physiological and psychological effects, GIM and ML were identified as the most effective tools for reducing stress and improving relaxation. These techniques warrant further research in larger samples and other populations. PeerJ Inc. 2020-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7247525/ /pubmed/32509467 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9217 Text en ©2020 Dib et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials
Dib, Sarah
Wells, Jonathan C.K.
Fewtrell, Mary
A within-subject comparison of different relaxation therapies in eliciting physiological and psychological changes in young women
title A within-subject comparison of different relaxation therapies in eliciting physiological and psychological changes in young women
title_full A within-subject comparison of different relaxation therapies in eliciting physiological and psychological changes in young women
title_fullStr A within-subject comparison of different relaxation therapies in eliciting physiological and psychological changes in young women
title_full_unstemmed A within-subject comparison of different relaxation therapies in eliciting physiological and psychological changes in young women
title_short A within-subject comparison of different relaxation therapies in eliciting physiological and psychological changes in young women
title_sort within-subject comparison of different relaxation therapies in eliciting physiological and psychological changes in young women
topic Clinical Trials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32509467
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9217
work_keys_str_mv AT dibsarah awithinsubjectcomparisonofdifferentrelaxationtherapiesinelicitingphysiologicalandpsychologicalchangesinyoungwomen
AT wellsjonathanck awithinsubjectcomparisonofdifferentrelaxationtherapiesinelicitingphysiologicalandpsychologicalchangesinyoungwomen
AT fewtrellmary awithinsubjectcomparisonofdifferentrelaxationtherapiesinelicitingphysiologicalandpsychologicalchangesinyoungwomen
AT dibsarah withinsubjectcomparisonofdifferentrelaxationtherapiesinelicitingphysiologicalandpsychologicalchangesinyoungwomen
AT wellsjonathanck withinsubjectcomparisonofdifferentrelaxationtherapiesinelicitingphysiologicalandpsychologicalchangesinyoungwomen
AT fewtrellmary withinsubjectcomparisonofdifferentrelaxationtherapiesinelicitingphysiologicalandpsychologicalchangesinyoungwomen