Cargando…
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation
Background: Machine perfusion (MP) and static cold storage (CS) are two prevalent methods for liver allograft preservation. However, the preferred method remains controversial. Aim: To conduct a meta-analysis on the impact of MP preservation on liver transplant outcome. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32528963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00135 |
_version_ | 1783538243630792704 |
---|---|
author | Jia, Junjun Nie, Yu Li, Jianhui Xie, Haiyang Zhou, Lin Yu, Jun Zheng, Shu-Sen |
author_facet | Jia, Junjun Nie, Yu Li, Jianhui Xie, Haiyang Zhou, Lin Yu, Jun Zheng, Shu-Sen |
author_sort | Jia, Junjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Machine perfusion (MP) and static cold storage (CS) are two prevalent methods for liver allograft preservation. However, the preferred method remains controversial. Aim: To conduct a meta-analysis on the impact of MP preservation on liver transplant outcome. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify relevant trials comparing the efficacy of MP vs. CS. Odds ratios (OR) and fixed-effects models were calculated to compare the pooled data. Results: Ten prospective cohort studies and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included (MP livers vs. CS livers = 315:489). Machine perfusion demonstrated superior outcomes in posttransplantation aspartate aminotransferase levels compared to CS (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) was significantly reduced with MP preservation than CS [OR = 0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.31–0.67; P < 0.0001]. The incidence of total biliary complications (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.34–0.83; P = 0.006) and that of ischemic cholangiopathy (OR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.18–0.85; P = 0.02) were significantly lower in recipients with MP preservation compared with CS preservation. Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) but not normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) was found to significantly protect grafts from total biliary complications and ischemic cholangiopathy (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences could be detected utilizing either HMP or NMP in primary nonfunction, hepatic artery thrombosis, postreperfusion syndrome, 1-year patient survival, or 1-year graft survival (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Machine perfusion is superior to CS on improving short-term outcomes for human liver transplantation, with a less clear effect in the longer term. Hypothermic machine perfusion but not NMP conducted significantly protective effects on EAD and biliary complications. Further RCTs are warranted to confirm MP's superiority and applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7247831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72478312020-06-10 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation Jia, Junjun Nie, Yu Li, Jianhui Xie, Haiyang Zhou, Lin Yu, Jun Zheng, Shu-Sen Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: Machine perfusion (MP) and static cold storage (CS) are two prevalent methods for liver allograft preservation. However, the preferred method remains controversial. Aim: To conduct a meta-analysis on the impact of MP preservation on liver transplant outcome. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify relevant trials comparing the efficacy of MP vs. CS. Odds ratios (OR) and fixed-effects models were calculated to compare the pooled data. Results: Ten prospective cohort studies and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included (MP livers vs. CS livers = 315:489). Machine perfusion demonstrated superior outcomes in posttransplantation aspartate aminotransferase levels compared to CS (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) was significantly reduced with MP preservation than CS [OR = 0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.31–0.67; P < 0.0001]. The incidence of total biliary complications (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.34–0.83; P = 0.006) and that of ischemic cholangiopathy (OR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.18–0.85; P = 0.02) were significantly lower in recipients with MP preservation compared with CS preservation. Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) but not normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) was found to significantly protect grafts from total biliary complications and ischemic cholangiopathy (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences could be detected utilizing either HMP or NMP in primary nonfunction, hepatic artery thrombosis, postreperfusion syndrome, 1-year patient survival, or 1-year graft survival (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Machine perfusion is superior to CS on improving short-term outcomes for human liver transplantation, with a less clear effect in the longer term. Hypothermic machine perfusion but not NMP conducted significantly protective effects on EAD and biliary complications. Further RCTs are warranted to confirm MP's superiority and applications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7247831/ /pubmed/32528963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00135 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jia, Nie, Li, Xie, Zhou, Yu and Zheng. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Jia, Junjun Nie, Yu Li, Jianhui Xie, Haiyang Zhou, Lin Yu, Jun Zheng, Shu-Sen A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation |
title | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation |
title_full | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation |
title_short | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of machine perfusion vs. static cold storage of liver allografts on liver transplantation outcomes: the future direction of graft preservation |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32528963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiajunjun asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation AT nieyu asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation AT lijianhui asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation AT xiehaiyang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation AT zhoulin asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation AT yujun asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation AT zhengshusen asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation AT jiajunjun systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation AT nieyu systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation AT lijianhui systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation AT xiehaiyang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation AT zhoulin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation AT yujun systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation AT zhengshusen systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation |