Cargando…

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation

Background: Machine perfusion (MP) and static cold storage (CS) are two prevalent methods for liver allograft preservation. However, the preferred method remains controversial. Aim: To conduct a meta-analysis on the impact of MP preservation on liver transplant outcome. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Junjun, Nie, Yu, Li, Jianhui, Xie, Haiyang, Zhou, Lin, Yu, Jun, Zheng, Shu-Sen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32528963
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00135
_version_ 1783538243630792704
author Jia, Junjun
Nie, Yu
Li, Jianhui
Xie, Haiyang
Zhou, Lin
Yu, Jun
Zheng, Shu-Sen
author_facet Jia, Junjun
Nie, Yu
Li, Jianhui
Xie, Haiyang
Zhou, Lin
Yu, Jun
Zheng, Shu-Sen
author_sort Jia, Junjun
collection PubMed
description Background: Machine perfusion (MP) and static cold storage (CS) are two prevalent methods for liver allograft preservation. However, the preferred method remains controversial. Aim: To conduct a meta-analysis on the impact of MP preservation on liver transplant outcome. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify relevant trials comparing the efficacy of MP vs. CS. Odds ratios (OR) and fixed-effects models were calculated to compare the pooled data. Results: Ten prospective cohort studies and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included (MP livers vs. CS livers = 315:489). Machine perfusion demonstrated superior outcomes in posttransplantation aspartate aminotransferase levels compared to CS (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) was significantly reduced with MP preservation than CS [OR = 0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.31–0.67; P < 0.0001]. The incidence of total biliary complications (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.34–0.83; P = 0.006) and that of ischemic cholangiopathy (OR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.18–0.85; P = 0.02) were significantly lower in recipients with MP preservation compared with CS preservation. Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) but not normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) was found to significantly protect grafts from total biliary complications and ischemic cholangiopathy (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences could be detected utilizing either HMP or NMP in primary nonfunction, hepatic artery thrombosis, postreperfusion syndrome, 1-year patient survival, or 1-year graft survival (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Machine perfusion is superior to CS on improving short-term outcomes for human liver transplantation, with a less clear effect in the longer term. Hypothermic machine perfusion but not NMP conducted significantly protective effects on EAD and biliary complications. Further RCTs are warranted to confirm MP's superiority and applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7247831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72478312020-06-10 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation Jia, Junjun Nie, Yu Li, Jianhui Xie, Haiyang Zhou, Lin Yu, Jun Zheng, Shu-Sen Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: Machine perfusion (MP) and static cold storage (CS) are two prevalent methods for liver allograft preservation. However, the preferred method remains controversial. Aim: To conduct a meta-analysis on the impact of MP preservation on liver transplant outcome. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify relevant trials comparing the efficacy of MP vs. CS. Odds ratios (OR) and fixed-effects models were calculated to compare the pooled data. Results: Ten prospective cohort studies and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included (MP livers vs. CS livers = 315:489). Machine perfusion demonstrated superior outcomes in posttransplantation aspartate aminotransferase levels compared to CS (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) was significantly reduced with MP preservation than CS [OR = 0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.31–0.67; P < 0.0001]. The incidence of total biliary complications (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.34–0.83; P = 0.006) and that of ischemic cholangiopathy (OR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.18–0.85; P = 0.02) were significantly lower in recipients with MP preservation compared with CS preservation. Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) but not normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) was found to significantly protect grafts from total biliary complications and ischemic cholangiopathy (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences could be detected utilizing either HMP or NMP in primary nonfunction, hepatic artery thrombosis, postreperfusion syndrome, 1-year patient survival, or 1-year graft survival (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Machine perfusion is superior to CS on improving short-term outcomes for human liver transplantation, with a less clear effect in the longer term. Hypothermic machine perfusion but not NMP conducted significantly protective effects on EAD and biliary complications. Further RCTs are warranted to confirm MP's superiority and applications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7247831/ /pubmed/32528963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00135 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jia, Nie, Li, Xie, Zhou, Yu and Zheng. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Jia, Junjun
Nie, Yu
Li, Jianhui
Xie, Haiyang
Zhou, Lin
Yu, Jun
Zheng, Shu-Sen
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation
title A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation
title_full A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation
title_fullStr A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation
title_short A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Perfusion vs. Static Cold Storage of Liver Allografts on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: The Future Direction of Graft Preservation
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of machine perfusion vs. static cold storage of liver allografts on liver transplantation outcomes: the future direction of graft preservation
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7247831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32528963
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00135
work_keys_str_mv AT jiajunjun asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation
AT nieyu asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation
AT lijianhui asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation
AT xiehaiyang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation
AT zhoulin asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation
AT yujun asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation
AT zhengshusen asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation
AT jiajunjun systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation
AT nieyu systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation
AT lijianhui systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation
AT xiehaiyang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation
AT zhoulin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation
AT yujun systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation
AT zhengshusen systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmachineperfusionvsstaticcoldstorageofliverallograftsonlivertransplantationoutcomesthefuturedirectionofgraftpreservation