Cargando…
Production and clinical evaluation of breast lesion skin markers for automated three-dimensional ultrasonography of the breast: a pilot study
OBJECTIVES: Automated ultrasound of the breast has the advantage to have the whole breast scanned by technicians. Consequently, feedback to the radiologist about concurrent focal abnormalities (e.g., palpable lesions) is lost. To enable marking of patient- or physician-reported focal abnormalities,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7248012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32060713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06695-y |
_version_ | 1783538276542447616 |
---|---|
author | de Jong, Leon Welleweerd, Marcel K. van Zelst, Jan C.M. Siepel, Francoise J. Stramigioli, Stefano Mann, Ritse M. de Korte, Chris L. Fütterer, Jurgen J. |
author_facet | de Jong, Leon Welleweerd, Marcel K. van Zelst, Jan C.M. Siepel, Francoise J. Stramigioli, Stefano Mann, Ritse M. de Korte, Chris L. Fütterer, Jurgen J. |
author_sort | de Jong, Leon |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Automated ultrasound of the breast has the advantage to have the whole breast scanned by technicians. Consequently, feedback to the radiologist about concurrent focal abnormalities (e.g., palpable lesions) is lost. To enable marking of patient- or physician-reported focal abnormalities, we aimed to develop skin markers that can be used without disturbing the interpretability of the image. METHODS: Disk-shaped markers were casted out of silicone. In this IRB-approved prospective study, 16 patients were included with a mean age of 57 (39–85). In all patients, the same volume was imaged twice using an automated breast ultrasound system, once with and once without a marker in place. Nine radiologists from two medical centers filled scoring forms regarding image quality, image interpretation, and confidence in providing a diagnosis based on the images. RESULTS: Marker adhesion was sufficient for automated scanning. Observer scores showed a significant shift in scores from excellent to good regarding diagnostic yield/image quality (χ(2), 15.99, p < 0.01), and image noise (χ(2), 21.20, p < 0.01) due to marker presence. In 93% of cases, the median score of observers “agree” with the statement that marker-induced noise did not influence image interpretability. Marker presence did not interfere with confidence in diagnosis (χ(2), 6.00, p = 0.20). CONCLUSION: Inexpensive, easy producible skin markers can be used for accurate lesion marking in automated ultrasound examinations of the breast while image interpretability is preserved. Any marker-induced noise and decreased image quality did not affect confidence in providing a diagnosis. KEY POINTS: • The use of a skin marker enables the reporting radiologist to identify a location which a patient is concerned about. • The developed skin marker can be used for accurate breast lesion marking in ultrasound examinations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7248012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72480122020-06-03 Production and clinical evaluation of breast lesion skin markers for automated three-dimensional ultrasonography of the breast: a pilot study de Jong, Leon Welleweerd, Marcel K. van Zelst, Jan C.M. Siepel, Francoise J. Stramigioli, Stefano Mann, Ritse M. de Korte, Chris L. Fütterer, Jurgen J. Eur Radiol Breast OBJECTIVES: Automated ultrasound of the breast has the advantage to have the whole breast scanned by technicians. Consequently, feedback to the radiologist about concurrent focal abnormalities (e.g., palpable lesions) is lost. To enable marking of patient- or physician-reported focal abnormalities, we aimed to develop skin markers that can be used without disturbing the interpretability of the image. METHODS: Disk-shaped markers were casted out of silicone. In this IRB-approved prospective study, 16 patients were included with a mean age of 57 (39–85). In all patients, the same volume was imaged twice using an automated breast ultrasound system, once with and once without a marker in place. Nine radiologists from two medical centers filled scoring forms regarding image quality, image interpretation, and confidence in providing a diagnosis based on the images. RESULTS: Marker adhesion was sufficient for automated scanning. Observer scores showed a significant shift in scores from excellent to good regarding diagnostic yield/image quality (χ(2), 15.99, p < 0.01), and image noise (χ(2), 21.20, p < 0.01) due to marker presence. In 93% of cases, the median score of observers “agree” with the statement that marker-induced noise did not influence image interpretability. Marker presence did not interfere with confidence in diagnosis (χ(2), 6.00, p = 0.20). CONCLUSION: Inexpensive, easy producible skin markers can be used for accurate lesion marking in automated ultrasound examinations of the breast while image interpretability is preserved. Any marker-induced noise and decreased image quality did not affect confidence in providing a diagnosis. KEY POINTS: • The use of a skin marker enables the reporting radiologist to identify a location which a patient is concerned about. • The developed skin marker can be used for accurate breast lesion marking in ultrasound examinations. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7248012/ /pubmed/32060713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06695-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Breast de Jong, Leon Welleweerd, Marcel K. van Zelst, Jan C.M. Siepel, Francoise J. Stramigioli, Stefano Mann, Ritse M. de Korte, Chris L. Fütterer, Jurgen J. Production and clinical evaluation of breast lesion skin markers for automated three-dimensional ultrasonography of the breast: a pilot study |
title | Production and clinical evaluation of breast lesion skin markers for automated three-dimensional ultrasonography of the breast: a pilot study |
title_full | Production and clinical evaluation of breast lesion skin markers for automated three-dimensional ultrasonography of the breast: a pilot study |
title_fullStr | Production and clinical evaluation of breast lesion skin markers for automated three-dimensional ultrasonography of the breast: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Production and clinical evaluation of breast lesion skin markers for automated three-dimensional ultrasonography of the breast: a pilot study |
title_short | Production and clinical evaluation of breast lesion skin markers for automated three-dimensional ultrasonography of the breast: a pilot study |
title_sort | production and clinical evaluation of breast lesion skin markers for automated three-dimensional ultrasonography of the breast: a pilot study |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7248012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32060713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06695-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dejongleon productionandclinicalevaluationofbreastlesionskinmarkersforautomatedthreedimensionalultrasonographyofthebreastapilotstudy AT welleweerdmarcelk productionandclinicalevaluationofbreastlesionskinmarkersforautomatedthreedimensionalultrasonographyofthebreastapilotstudy AT vanzelstjancm productionandclinicalevaluationofbreastlesionskinmarkersforautomatedthreedimensionalultrasonographyofthebreastapilotstudy AT siepelfrancoisej productionandclinicalevaluationofbreastlesionskinmarkersforautomatedthreedimensionalultrasonographyofthebreastapilotstudy AT stramigiolistefano productionandclinicalevaluationofbreastlesionskinmarkersforautomatedthreedimensionalultrasonographyofthebreastapilotstudy AT mannritsem productionandclinicalevaluationofbreastlesionskinmarkersforautomatedthreedimensionalultrasonographyofthebreastapilotstudy AT dekortechrisl productionandclinicalevaluationofbreastlesionskinmarkersforautomatedthreedimensionalultrasonographyofthebreastapilotstudy AT futtererjurgenj productionandclinicalevaluationofbreastlesionskinmarkersforautomatedthreedimensionalultrasonographyofthebreastapilotstudy |