Cargando…

Modelling Survival of Patients Treated with Adjuvant Nivolumab Who Have Melanoma with Lymph Node Involvement or Metastatic Disease After Complete Resection

INTRODUCTION: Nivolumab demonstrated significant recurrence-free survival (RFS) gains versus ipilimumab in the CheckMate-238 trial, whereas the CA184-029 trial showed superior RFS gains for ipilimumab versus placebo. No head-to-head trial data were available to compare the efficacy of nivolumab to t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batteson, Rachael, Hart, Rose, Hemstock, Matthew, Gooden, Kyna, Kotapati, Srividya, Roze, Stephane, Lee, Dawn, Amadi, Adenike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7248152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31587138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-00181-y
_version_ 1783538306576809984
author Batteson, Rachael
Hart, Rose
Hemstock, Matthew
Gooden, Kyna
Kotapati, Srividya
Roze, Stephane
Lee, Dawn
Amadi, Adenike
author_facet Batteson, Rachael
Hart, Rose
Hemstock, Matthew
Gooden, Kyna
Kotapati, Srividya
Roze, Stephane
Lee, Dawn
Amadi, Adenike
author_sort Batteson, Rachael
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Nivolumab demonstrated significant recurrence-free survival (RFS) gains versus ipilimumab in the CheckMate-238 trial, whereas the CA184-029 trial showed superior RFS gains for ipilimumab versus placebo. No head-to-head trial data were available to compare the efficacy of nivolumab to that of observation, so indirect treatment comparisons were required. Additionally, overall survival (OS) data were not available from CheckMate-238, and the clinical pathway for melanoma has changed significantly over the last decade. Four modelling options were developed using different methods and evidence sources to estimate OS and the impact of nivolumab on predicted life-years in the adjuvant setting; however, this article focuses on two primary methods. METHODS: RFS for nivolumab and observation were informed by a patient-level data meta-regression. The first model was a partitioned survival model, where the parametric OS curve for observation was derived from CA184-029 and nivolumab OS was based on a surrogacy relationship between RFS and OS specific to adjuvant melanoma. The other option used a state-transition model to estimate post-recurrence survival using different data sources. RESULTS: The modelling options estimated different OS for both nivolumab and observation but demonstrated at least a 32% increase in life-years gained for nivolumab versus observation. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrated the difficulties in modelling within the adjuvant setting. Each model produced different survival projections, showing the need to explore different techniques to address the extent of uncertainty. This also highlighted the importance of understanding the impact of RFS in the long term in a setting where the aim of treatment is to remain disease free. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-00181-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7248152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72481522020-06-05 Modelling Survival of Patients Treated with Adjuvant Nivolumab Who Have Melanoma with Lymph Node Involvement or Metastatic Disease After Complete Resection Batteson, Rachael Hart, Rose Hemstock, Matthew Gooden, Kyna Kotapati, Srividya Roze, Stephane Lee, Dawn Amadi, Adenike Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Nivolumab demonstrated significant recurrence-free survival (RFS) gains versus ipilimumab in the CheckMate-238 trial, whereas the CA184-029 trial showed superior RFS gains for ipilimumab versus placebo. No head-to-head trial data were available to compare the efficacy of nivolumab to that of observation, so indirect treatment comparisons were required. Additionally, overall survival (OS) data were not available from CheckMate-238, and the clinical pathway for melanoma has changed significantly over the last decade. Four modelling options were developed using different methods and evidence sources to estimate OS and the impact of nivolumab on predicted life-years in the adjuvant setting; however, this article focuses on two primary methods. METHODS: RFS for nivolumab and observation were informed by a patient-level data meta-regression. The first model was a partitioned survival model, where the parametric OS curve for observation was derived from CA184-029 and nivolumab OS was based on a surrogacy relationship between RFS and OS specific to adjuvant melanoma. The other option used a state-transition model to estimate post-recurrence survival using different data sources. RESULTS: The modelling options estimated different OS for both nivolumab and observation but demonstrated at least a 32% increase in life-years gained for nivolumab versus observation. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrated the difficulties in modelling within the adjuvant setting. Each model produced different survival projections, showing the need to explore different techniques to address the extent of uncertainty. This also highlighted the importance of understanding the impact of RFS in the long term in a setting where the aim of treatment is to remain disease free. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-00181-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7248152/ /pubmed/31587138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-00181-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Batteson, Rachael
Hart, Rose
Hemstock, Matthew
Gooden, Kyna
Kotapati, Srividya
Roze, Stephane
Lee, Dawn
Amadi, Adenike
Modelling Survival of Patients Treated with Adjuvant Nivolumab Who Have Melanoma with Lymph Node Involvement or Metastatic Disease After Complete Resection
title Modelling Survival of Patients Treated with Adjuvant Nivolumab Who Have Melanoma with Lymph Node Involvement or Metastatic Disease After Complete Resection
title_full Modelling Survival of Patients Treated with Adjuvant Nivolumab Who Have Melanoma with Lymph Node Involvement or Metastatic Disease After Complete Resection
title_fullStr Modelling Survival of Patients Treated with Adjuvant Nivolumab Who Have Melanoma with Lymph Node Involvement or Metastatic Disease After Complete Resection
title_full_unstemmed Modelling Survival of Patients Treated with Adjuvant Nivolumab Who Have Melanoma with Lymph Node Involvement or Metastatic Disease After Complete Resection
title_short Modelling Survival of Patients Treated with Adjuvant Nivolumab Who Have Melanoma with Lymph Node Involvement or Metastatic Disease After Complete Resection
title_sort modelling survival of patients treated with adjuvant nivolumab who have melanoma with lymph node involvement or metastatic disease after complete resection
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7248152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31587138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-00181-y
work_keys_str_mv AT battesonrachael modellingsurvivalofpatientstreatedwithadjuvantnivolumabwhohavemelanomawithlymphnodeinvolvementormetastaticdiseaseaftercompleteresection
AT hartrose modellingsurvivalofpatientstreatedwithadjuvantnivolumabwhohavemelanomawithlymphnodeinvolvementormetastaticdiseaseaftercompleteresection
AT hemstockmatthew modellingsurvivalofpatientstreatedwithadjuvantnivolumabwhohavemelanomawithlymphnodeinvolvementormetastaticdiseaseaftercompleteresection
AT goodenkyna modellingsurvivalofpatientstreatedwithadjuvantnivolumabwhohavemelanomawithlymphnodeinvolvementormetastaticdiseaseaftercompleteresection
AT kotapatisrividya modellingsurvivalofpatientstreatedwithadjuvantnivolumabwhohavemelanomawithlymphnodeinvolvementormetastaticdiseaseaftercompleteresection
AT rozestephane modellingsurvivalofpatientstreatedwithadjuvantnivolumabwhohavemelanomawithlymphnodeinvolvementormetastaticdiseaseaftercompleteresection
AT leedawn modellingsurvivalofpatientstreatedwithadjuvantnivolumabwhohavemelanomawithlymphnodeinvolvementormetastaticdiseaseaftercompleteresection
AT amadiadenike modellingsurvivalofpatientstreatedwithadjuvantnivolumabwhohavemelanomawithlymphnodeinvolvementormetastaticdiseaseaftercompleteresection