Cargando…

Cardiovascular System Under Simulated Weightlessness: Head-Down Bed Rest vs. Dry Immersion

BACKGROUND: The most applicable human models of weightlessness are −6° head-down bed rest (HDBR) and head-out dry immersion (DI). A detailed experimental comparison of cardiovascular responses in both models has not yet been carried out, in spite of numerous studies having been performed in each of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amirova, Liubov, Navasiolava, Nastassia, Rukavishvikov, Ilya, Gauquelin-Koch, Guillemette, Gharib, Claude, Kozlovskaya, Inessa, Custaud, Marc-Antoine, Tomilovskaya, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7248392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32508663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00395
_version_ 1783538363022704640
author Amirova, Liubov
Navasiolava, Nastassia
Rukavishvikov, Ilya
Gauquelin-Koch, Guillemette
Gharib, Claude
Kozlovskaya, Inessa
Custaud, Marc-Antoine
Tomilovskaya, Elena
author_facet Amirova, Liubov
Navasiolava, Nastassia
Rukavishvikov, Ilya
Gauquelin-Koch, Guillemette
Gharib, Claude
Kozlovskaya, Inessa
Custaud, Marc-Antoine
Tomilovskaya, Elena
author_sort Amirova, Liubov
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The most applicable human models of weightlessness are −6° head-down bed rest (HDBR) and head-out dry immersion (DI). A detailed experimental comparison of cardiovascular responses in both models has not yet been carried out, in spite of numerous studies having been performed in each of the models separately. OBJECTIVES: We compared changes in central hemodynamics, autonomic regulation, plasma volume, and water balance induced by −6° HDBR and DI. METHODS: Eleven subjects participated in a 21-day HDBR and 12 subjects in a 3-day DI. During exposure, measurements of the water balance, blood pressure, and heart rate were performed daily. Plasma volume evolution was assessed by the Dill–Costill method. In order to assess orthostatic tolerance time (OTT), central hemodynamic responses to orthostatic stimuli, and autonomous regulation, the 80° lower body negative pressure–tilt test was conducted before and right after both exposures. RESULTS: For most of the studied parameters, the changes were co-directional, although they differed in their extent. The changes in systolic blood pressure and total peripheral resistance after HDBR were more pronounced than those after DI. The OTT was decreased in both groups: to 14.2 ± 3.1 min (vs. 27.9 ± 2.5 min before exposure) in the group of 21-day HDBR and to 8.7 ± 2.1 min (vs. 27.7 ± 1.2 min before exposure) in the group of 3-day DI. CONCLUSIONS: In general, cardiovascular changes during the 21-day HDBR and 3-day DI were co-directional. In some cases, changes in the parameters after 3-day DI exceeded changes after the 21-day HDBR, while in other cases the opposite was true. Significantly stronger effects of DI on cardiovascular function may be due to hypovolemia and support unloading (supportlessness).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7248392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72483922020-06-05 Cardiovascular System Under Simulated Weightlessness: Head-Down Bed Rest vs. Dry Immersion Amirova, Liubov Navasiolava, Nastassia Rukavishvikov, Ilya Gauquelin-Koch, Guillemette Gharib, Claude Kozlovskaya, Inessa Custaud, Marc-Antoine Tomilovskaya, Elena Front Physiol Physiology BACKGROUND: The most applicable human models of weightlessness are −6° head-down bed rest (HDBR) and head-out dry immersion (DI). A detailed experimental comparison of cardiovascular responses in both models has not yet been carried out, in spite of numerous studies having been performed in each of the models separately. OBJECTIVES: We compared changes in central hemodynamics, autonomic regulation, plasma volume, and water balance induced by −6° HDBR and DI. METHODS: Eleven subjects participated in a 21-day HDBR and 12 subjects in a 3-day DI. During exposure, measurements of the water balance, blood pressure, and heart rate were performed daily. Plasma volume evolution was assessed by the Dill–Costill method. In order to assess orthostatic tolerance time (OTT), central hemodynamic responses to orthostatic stimuli, and autonomous regulation, the 80° lower body negative pressure–tilt test was conducted before and right after both exposures. RESULTS: For most of the studied parameters, the changes were co-directional, although they differed in their extent. The changes in systolic blood pressure and total peripheral resistance after HDBR were more pronounced than those after DI. The OTT was decreased in both groups: to 14.2 ± 3.1 min (vs. 27.9 ± 2.5 min before exposure) in the group of 21-day HDBR and to 8.7 ± 2.1 min (vs. 27.7 ± 1.2 min before exposure) in the group of 3-day DI. CONCLUSIONS: In general, cardiovascular changes during the 21-day HDBR and 3-day DI were co-directional. In some cases, changes in the parameters after 3-day DI exceeded changes after the 21-day HDBR, while in other cases the opposite was true. Significantly stronger effects of DI on cardiovascular function may be due to hypovolemia and support unloading (supportlessness). Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7248392/ /pubmed/32508663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00395 Text en Copyright © 2020 Amirova, Navasiolava, Rukavishvikov, Gauquelin-Koch, Gharib, Kozlovskaya, Custaud and Tomilovskaya. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Amirova, Liubov
Navasiolava, Nastassia
Rukavishvikov, Ilya
Gauquelin-Koch, Guillemette
Gharib, Claude
Kozlovskaya, Inessa
Custaud, Marc-Antoine
Tomilovskaya, Elena
Cardiovascular System Under Simulated Weightlessness: Head-Down Bed Rest vs. Dry Immersion
title Cardiovascular System Under Simulated Weightlessness: Head-Down Bed Rest vs. Dry Immersion
title_full Cardiovascular System Under Simulated Weightlessness: Head-Down Bed Rest vs. Dry Immersion
title_fullStr Cardiovascular System Under Simulated Weightlessness: Head-Down Bed Rest vs. Dry Immersion
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular System Under Simulated Weightlessness: Head-Down Bed Rest vs. Dry Immersion
title_short Cardiovascular System Under Simulated Weightlessness: Head-Down Bed Rest vs. Dry Immersion
title_sort cardiovascular system under simulated weightlessness: head-down bed rest vs. dry immersion
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7248392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32508663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00395
work_keys_str_mv AT amirovaliubov cardiovascularsystemundersimulatedweightlessnessheaddownbedrestvsdryimmersion
AT navasiolavanastassia cardiovascularsystemundersimulatedweightlessnessheaddownbedrestvsdryimmersion
AT rukavishvikovilya cardiovascularsystemundersimulatedweightlessnessheaddownbedrestvsdryimmersion
AT gauquelinkochguillemette cardiovascularsystemundersimulatedweightlessnessheaddownbedrestvsdryimmersion
AT gharibclaude cardiovascularsystemundersimulatedweightlessnessheaddownbedrestvsdryimmersion
AT kozlovskayainessa cardiovascularsystemundersimulatedweightlessnessheaddownbedrestvsdryimmersion
AT custaudmarcantoine cardiovascularsystemundersimulatedweightlessnessheaddownbedrestvsdryimmersion
AT tomilovskayaelena cardiovascularsystemundersimulatedweightlessnessheaddownbedrestvsdryimmersion