Cargando…

Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, eligible for transplantation

BACKGROUND: The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved significantly in the past decade, and new drug combinations have improved the response rates and prolonged survival. Studies comparing different induction chemotherapy regimens have shown that triple combinations have better results than...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crusoe, Edvan De Queiroz, Higashi, Fabiana, Martinez, Gracia, Bittencourt, Rosane, Pinto Neto, Jorge Vaz, Sousa, Lais, Santucci, Rodrigo, Magalhães, Roberto José Pessoa, Colli, Gilberto, Nunes, Renata Ferreira Marques, Ribeiro, Glaciano, Nicacio, Jandir, Zanella, Karla Richter, Kutner, Jose Mauro, Magalhaes, Andre, Leao, Danielle, Hallack Neto, Abrahão Elias, Braga, Walter, Souza, Emanuella G, Guimaraes, Antonio Julio A.M., Durigon, Giovanna Steffenello, Laks, Dani, Maiolino, Angelo, Hungria, Vania Tietsche de Moraes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7248497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31537476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2019.05.004
_version_ 1783538387236421632
author Crusoe, Edvan De Queiroz
Higashi, Fabiana
Martinez, Gracia
Bittencourt, Rosane
Pinto Neto, Jorge Vaz
Sousa, Lais
Santucci, Rodrigo
Magalhães, Roberto José Pessoa
Colli, Gilberto
Nunes, Renata Ferreira Marques
Ribeiro, Glaciano
Nicacio, Jandir
Zanella, Karla Richter
Kutner, Jose Mauro
Magalhaes, Andre
Leao, Danielle
Hallack Neto, Abrahão Elias
Braga, Walter
Souza, Emanuella G
Guimaraes, Antonio Julio A.M.
Durigon, Giovanna Steffenello
Laks, Dani
Maiolino, Angelo
Hungria, Vania Tietsche de Moraes
author_facet Crusoe, Edvan De Queiroz
Higashi, Fabiana
Martinez, Gracia
Bittencourt, Rosane
Pinto Neto, Jorge Vaz
Sousa, Lais
Santucci, Rodrigo
Magalhães, Roberto José Pessoa
Colli, Gilberto
Nunes, Renata Ferreira Marques
Ribeiro, Glaciano
Nicacio, Jandir
Zanella, Karla Richter
Kutner, Jose Mauro
Magalhaes, Andre
Leao, Danielle
Hallack Neto, Abrahão Elias
Braga, Walter
Souza, Emanuella G
Guimaraes, Antonio Julio A.M.
Durigon, Giovanna Steffenello
Laks, Dani
Maiolino, Angelo
Hungria, Vania Tietsche de Moraes
author_sort Crusoe, Edvan De Queiroz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved significantly in the past decade, and new drug combinations have improved the response rates and prolonged survival. Studies comparing different induction chemotherapy regimens have shown that triple combinations have better results than double combinations. However, comparisons among different triple combinations are rare in the literature. METHODS: We retrospectively compared two triple combinations comprising bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) versus thalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CTD), and aimed at identifying which of the two combinations would yield better response rates following four induction cycles prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with untreated multiple myeloma. RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 311 patients from 24 different centers.The VCD regimen was used as induction therapy by 117 (37.6%) patients, whereas 194 (62.4%) patients received the CTD regimen. After four cycles of induction on an intention-to-treat basis, 54% of the patients in the VCD group achieved at least very good partial response versus 42.8% in the CTD group (p = 0.05). We observed no difference in neuropathy or thrombotic events rates among the two regimens. CONCLUSION: Our results corroborate the superiority of the triple combination regimes containing bortezomib over the triple combination with thalidomide as pre ASCT induction therapy in MM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7248497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72484972020-05-29 Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, eligible for transplantation Crusoe, Edvan De Queiroz Higashi, Fabiana Martinez, Gracia Bittencourt, Rosane Pinto Neto, Jorge Vaz Sousa, Lais Santucci, Rodrigo Magalhães, Roberto José Pessoa Colli, Gilberto Nunes, Renata Ferreira Marques Ribeiro, Glaciano Nicacio, Jandir Zanella, Karla Richter Kutner, Jose Mauro Magalhaes, Andre Leao, Danielle Hallack Neto, Abrahão Elias Braga, Walter Souza, Emanuella G Guimaraes, Antonio Julio A.M. Durigon, Giovanna Steffenello Laks, Dani Maiolino, Angelo Hungria, Vania Tietsche de Moraes Hematol Transfus Cell Ther Original Article BACKGROUND: The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved significantly in the past decade, and new drug combinations have improved the response rates and prolonged survival. Studies comparing different induction chemotherapy regimens have shown that triple combinations have better results than double combinations. However, comparisons among different triple combinations are rare in the literature. METHODS: We retrospectively compared two triple combinations comprising bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) versus thalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CTD), and aimed at identifying which of the two combinations would yield better response rates following four induction cycles prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with untreated multiple myeloma. RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 311 patients from 24 different centers.The VCD regimen was used as induction therapy by 117 (37.6%) patients, whereas 194 (62.4%) patients received the CTD regimen. After four cycles of induction on an intention-to-treat basis, 54% of the patients in the VCD group achieved at least very good partial response versus 42.8% in the CTD group (p = 0.05). We observed no difference in neuropathy or thrombotic events rates among the two regimens. CONCLUSION: Our results corroborate the superiority of the triple combination regimes containing bortezomib over the triple combination with thalidomide as pre ASCT induction therapy in MM. Sociedade Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia 2020 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7248497/ /pubmed/31537476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2019.05.004 Text en © 2019 Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Crusoe, Edvan De Queiroz
Higashi, Fabiana
Martinez, Gracia
Bittencourt, Rosane
Pinto Neto, Jorge Vaz
Sousa, Lais
Santucci, Rodrigo
Magalhães, Roberto José Pessoa
Colli, Gilberto
Nunes, Renata Ferreira Marques
Ribeiro, Glaciano
Nicacio, Jandir
Zanella, Karla Richter
Kutner, Jose Mauro
Magalhaes, Andre
Leao, Danielle
Hallack Neto, Abrahão Elias
Braga, Walter
Souza, Emanuella G
Guimaraes, Antonio Julio A.M.
Durigon, Giovanna Steffenello
Laks, Dani
Maiolino, Angelo
Hungria, Vania Tietsche de Moraes
Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, eligible for transplantation
title Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, eligible for transplantation
title_full Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, eligible for transplantation
title_fullStr Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, eligible for transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, eligible for transplantation
title_short Superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, eligible for transplantation
title_sort superiority of the triple combination of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, eligible for transplantation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7248497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31537476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2019.05.004
work_keys_str_mv AT crusoeedvandequeiroz superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT higashifabiana superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT martinezgracia superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT bittencourtrosane superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT pintonetojorgevaz superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT sousalais superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT santuccirodrigo superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT magalhaesrobertojosepessoa superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT colligilberto superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT nunesrenataferreiramarques superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT ribeiroglaciano superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT nicaciojandir superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT zanellakarlarichter superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT kutnerjosemauro superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT magalhaesandre superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT leaodanielle superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT hallacknetoabrahaoelias superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT bragawalter superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT souzaemanuellag superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT guimaraesantoniojulioam superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT durigongiovannasteffenello superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT laksdani superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT maiolinoangelo superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT hungriavaniatietschedemoraes superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation
AT superiorityofthetriplecombinationofbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneversuscyclophosphamidethalidomideanddexamethasoneinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaeligiblefortransplantation