Cargando…

Assessment of Objective Audiometry to Predict Subjective Satisfaction in Patients With Hearing Aids

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlation of objective audiometry with user satisfaction as measured with the questionnaire scores. METHODS: Twenty patients with hearing loss, who agreed to wear a hearing aid and were referred for hearing aid fitting, were included in this prospective clinical stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwak, Min Young, Choi, Woo Ri, Park, Jun Woo, Hwang, Eun Jeong, Ha, Yeo Ra, Chung, Jong Woo, Kang, Woo Seok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7248607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31739653
http://dx.doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2019.00871
_version_ 1783538411811897344
author Kwak, Min Young
Choi, Woo Ri
Park, Jun Woo
Hwang, Eun Jeong
Ha, Yeo Ra
Chung, Jong Woo
Kang, Woo Seok
author_facet Kwak, Min Young
Choi, Woo Ri
Park, Jun Woo
Hwang, Eun Jeong
Ha, Yeo Ra
Chung, Jong Woo
Kang, Woo Seok
author_sort Kwak, Min Young
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlation of objective audiometry with user satisfaction as measured with the questionnaire scores. METHODS: Twenty patients with hearing loss, who agreed to wear a hearing aid and were referred for hearing aid fitting, were included in this prospective clinical study. All patients used the in-the-canal type of Wide7 hearing aid provided by BSL Co., Ltd. We performed the Korean version of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (K-HHIE) and the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (K-IOI-HA) before and 1, 3, and 6 months after wearing the hearing aid. We also performed pure tone audiometry (PTA), speech audiometry (SA), functional gain (FG), hearing in noise test (HINT), and central auditory processing disorder tests, such as frequency pattern test (CA-f), duration pattern test (CA-d), and dichotic test (CA-Di). Patients were divided into two groups (group A-HHIE, improved; group B-HHIE, same or worse) by comparing the score of K-HHIE before and 6 months after wearing the hearing aid. In the 6-month K-IOI-HA questionnaire, 21 points were considered as the average score. Based on this, we further divided patients into two groups (group A-IOI, >21 points; group B-IOI, ≤21 points). RESULTS: Group A-HHIE included six patients and group B-HHIE included 14 patients. In PTA, SA, HINT, CA-d, and CA-Di, group A-HHIE showed higher improvements than group B-HHIE, which were not statistically significant. Group A-IOI included 12 patients and group B-IOI included eight patients. No statistically significant difference was noted in the improvement of audiometric results over a period of 6 months after wearing the hearing aid between groups A-IOI and B-IOI. CONCLUSION: There were no significant and consistent audiometric results to reflect patient’s satisfaction with the hearing aid. Therefore, when analyzing the hearing aid-fitting outcome, both the objective audiometric tests and subjective questionnaire should be performed together for validating hearing aid performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7248607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72486072020-06-05 Assessment of Objective Audiometry to Predict Subjective Satisfaction in Patients With Hearing Aids Kwak, Min Young Choi, Woo Ri Park, Jun Woo Hwang, Eun Jeong Ha, Yeo Ra Chung, Jong Woo Kang, Woo Seok Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlation of objective audiometry with user satisfaction as measured with the questionnaire scores. METHODS: Twenty patients with hearing loss, who agreed to wear a hearing aid and were referred for hearing aid fitting, were included in this prospective clinical study. All patients used the in-the-canal type of Wide7 hearing aid provided by BSL Co., Ltd. We performed the Korean version of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (K-HHIE) and the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (K-IOI-HA) before and 1, 3, and 6 months after wearing the hearing aid. We also performed pure tone audiometry (PTA), speech audiometry (SA), functional gain (FG), hearing in noise test (HINT), and central auditory processing disorder tests, such as frequency pattern test (CA-f), duration pattern test (CA-d), and dichotic test (CA-Di). Patients were divided into two groups (group A-HHIE, improved; group B-HHIE, same or worse) by comparing the score of K-HHIE before and 6 months after wearing the hearing aid. In the 6-month K-IOI-HA questionnaire, 21 points were considered as the average score. Based on this, we further divided patients into two groups (group A-IOI, >21 points; group B-IOI, ≤21 points). RESULTS: Group A-HHIE included six patients and group B-HHIE included 14 patients. In PTA, SA, HINT, CA-d, and CA-Di, group A-HHIE showed higher improvements than group B-HHIE, which were not statistically significant. Group A-IOI included 12 patients and group B-IOI included eight patients. No statistically significant difference was noted in the improvement of audiometric results over a period of 6 months after wearing the hearing aid between groups A-IOI and B-IOI. CONCLUSION: There were no significant and consistent audiometric results to reflect patient’s satisfaction with the hearing aid. Therefore, when analyzing the hearing aid-fitting outcome, both the objective audiometric tests and subjective questionnaire should be performed together for validating hearing aid performance. Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2020-05 2019-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7248607/ /pubmed/31739653 http://dx.doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2019.00871 Text en Copyright © 2020 by Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kwak, Min Young
Choi, Woo Ri
Park, Jun Woo
Hwang, Eun Jeong
Ha, Yeo Ra
Chung, Jong Woo
Kang, Woo Seok
Assessment of Objective Audiometry to Predict Subjective Satisfaction in Patients With Hearing Aids
title Assessment of Objective Audiometry to Predict Subjective Satisfaction in Patients With Hearing Aids
title_full Assessment of Objective Audiometry to Predict Subjective Satisfaction in Patients With Hearing Aids
title_fullStr Assessment of Objective Audiometry to Predict Subjective Satisfaction in Patients With Hearing Aids
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Objective Audiometry to Predict Subjective Satisfaction in Patients With Hearing Aids
title_short Assessment of Objective Audiometry to Predict Subjective Satisfaction in Patients With Hearing Aids
title_sort assessment of objective audiometry to predict subjective satisfaction in patients with hearing aids
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7248607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31739653
http://dx.doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2019.00871
work_keys_str_mv AT kwakminyoung assessmentofobjectiveaudiometrytopredictsubjectivesatisfactioninpatientswithhearingaids
AT choiwoori assessmentofobjectiveaudiometrytopredictsubjectivesatisfactioninpatientswithhearingaids
AT parkjunwoo assessmentofobjectiveaudiometrytopredictsubjectivesatisfactioninpatientswithhearingaids
AT hwangeunjeong assessmentofobjectiveaudiometrytopredictsubjectivesatisfactioninpatientswithhearingaids
AT hayeora assessmentofobjectiveaudiometrytopredictsubjectivesatisfactioninpatientswithhearingaids
AT chungjongwoo assessmentofobjectiveaudiometrytopredictsubjectivesatisfactioninpatientswithhearingaids
AT kangwooseok assessmentofobjectiveaudiometrytopredictsubjectivesatisfactioninpatientswithhearingaids