Cargando…

A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces

The aim of this study was to define a reliable and sensitive test method for assessing Shock Absorption (SA), Vertical Deformation (VD), and Energy Restitution (ER) in treadmill surfaces. A total of 42 treadmills belonging to four different models were included in the study: (a) Technogym Jog700 Exc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colino, Enrique, Garcia-Unanue, Jorge, Van Hooren, Bas, Gallardo, Leonor, Meijer, Kenneth, Lucia, Alejandro, Felipe, Jose Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32397664
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20092724
_version_ 1783538549172207616
author Colino, Enrique
Garcia-Unanue, Jorge
Van Hooren, Bas
Gallardo, Leonor
Meijer, Kenneth
Lucia, Alejandro
Felipe, Jose Luis
author_facet Colino, Enrique
Garcia-Unanue, Jorge
Van Hooren, Bas
Gallardo, Leonor
Meijer, Kenneth
Lucia, Alejandro
Felipe, Jose Luis
author_sort Colino, Enrique
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to define a reliable and sensitive test method for assessing Shock Absorption (SA), Vertical Deformation (VD), and Energy Restitution (ER) in treadmill surfaces. A total of 42 treadmills belonging to four different models were included in the study: (a) Technogym Jog700 Excite (n = 10), (b) Technogym Artis Run (n = 12), (c) LifeFitness Integrity Series 97T (n = 11), and (d) LifeFitness Integrity Series DX (n = 9). An advanced artificial athlete (AAA) device was used to assess SA, VD, and ER at three different locations along the longitudinal axis of each treadmill and in the support area of the athletes’ feet. For each location, our results show that the error assumed when performing one impact with the AAA instead of three (SA ≤ |0.1|%, VD ≤ |0.0| mm, and ER ≤ |0.2|%) is lower than the smallest changes that can be detected by the measuring device (SA = 0.4%, VD = 0.2 mm, and ER = 0.9%). Also, our results show the ability of the test method to detect meaningful differences between locations once the one-impact criterium is adopted, since absolute minimum differences between zones (SA: |0.6|%, VD: |0.3| mm, and ER: |1.2|%) were above the uncertainty of the measuring device. Therefore, performing a single impact with the AAA in each of the three locations described in this study can be considered a representative and reliable method for assessing SA, VD, and ER in treadmill surfaces.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7249199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72491992020-06-10 A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces Colino, Enrique Garcia-Unanue, Jorge Van Hooren, Bas Gallardo, Leonor Meijer, Kenneth Lucia, Alejandro Felipe, Jose Luis Sensors (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to define a reliable and sensitive test method for assessing Shock Absorption (SA), Vertical Deformation (VD), and Energy Restitution (ER) in treadmill surfaces. A total of 42 treadmills belonging to four different models were included in the study: (a) Technogym Jog700 Excite (n = 10), (b) Technogym Artis Run (n = 12), (c) LifeFitness Integrity Series 97T (n = 11), and (d) LifeFitness Integrity Series DX (n = 9). An advanced artificial athlete (AAA) device was used to assess SA, VD, and ER at three different locations along the longitudinal axis of each treadmill and in the support area of the athletes’ feet. For each location, our results show that the error assumed when performing one impact with the AAA instead of three (SA ≤ |0.1|%, VD ≤ |0.0| mm, and ER ≤ |0.2|%) is lower than the smallest changes that can be detected by the measuring device (SA = 0.4%, VD = 0.2 mm, and ER = 0.9%). Also, our results show the ability of the test method to detect meaningful differences between locations once the one-impact criterium is adopted, since absolute minimum differences between zones (SA: |0.6|%, VD: |0.3| mm, and ER: |1.2|%) were above the uncertainty of the measuring device. Therefore, performing a single impact with the AAA in each of the three locations described in this study can be considered a representative and reliable method for assessing SA, VD, and ER in treadmill surfaces. MDPI 2020-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7249199/ /pubmed/32397664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20092724 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Colino, Enrique
Garcia-Unanue, Jorge
Van Hooren, Bas
Gallardo, Leonor
Meijer, Kenneth
Lucia, Alejandro
Felipe, Jose Luis
A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces
title A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces
title_full A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces
title_fullStr A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces
title_full_unstemmed A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces
title_short A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces
title_sort proposed method to assess the mechanical properties of treadmill surfaces
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32397664
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20092724
work_keys_str_mv AT colinoenrique aproposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces
AT garciaunanuejorge aproposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces
AT vanhoorenbas aproposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces
AT gallardoleonor aproposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces
AT meijerkenneth aproposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces
AT luciaalejandro aproposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces
AT felipejoseluis aproposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces
AT colinoenrique proposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces
AT garciaunanuejorge proposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces
AT vanhoorenbas proposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces
AT gallardoleonor proposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces
AT meijerkenneth proposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces
AT luciaalejandro proposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces
AT felipejoseluis proposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces