Cargando…
A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces
The aim of this study was to define a reliable and sensitive test method for assessing Shock Absorption (SA), Vertical Deformation (VD), and Energy Restitution (ER) in treadmill surfaces. A total of 42 treadmills belonging to four different models were included in the study: (a) Technogym Jog700 Exc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32397664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20092724 |
_version_ | 1783538549172207616 |
---|---|
author | Colino, Enrique Garcia-Unanue, Jorge Van Hooren, Bas Gallardo, Leonor Meijer, Kenneth Lucia, Alejandro Felipe, Jose Luis |
author_facet | Colino, Enrique Garcia-Unanue, Jorge Van Hooren, Bas Gallardo, Leonor Meijer, Kenneth Lucia, Alejandro Felipe, Jose Luis |
author_sort | Colino, Enrique |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to define a reliable and sensitive test method for assessing Shock Absorption (SA), Vertical Deformation (VD), and Energy Restitution (ER) in treadmill surfaces. A total of 42 treadmills belonging to four different models were included in the study: (a) Technogym Jog700 Excite (n = 10), (b) Technogym Artis Run (n = 12), (c) LifeFitness Integrity Series 97T (n = 11), and (d) LifeFitness Integrity Series DX (n = 9). An advanced artificial athlete (AAA) device was used to assess SA, VD, and ER at three different locations along the longitudinal axis of each treadmill and in the support area of the athletes’ feet. For each location, our results show that the error assumed when performing one impact with the AAA instead of three (SA ≤ |0.1|%, VD ≤ |0.0| mm, and ER ≤ |0.2|%) is lower than the smallest changes that can be detected by the measuring device (SA = 0.4%, VD = 0.2 mm, and ER = 0.9%). Also, our results show the ability of the test method to detect meaningful differences between locations once the one-impact criterium is adopted, since absolute minimum differences between zones (SA: |0.6|%, VD: |0.3| mm, and ER: |1.2|%) were above the uncertainty of the measuring device. Therefore, performing a single impact with the AAA in each of the three locations described in this study can be considered a representative and reliable method for assessing SA, VD, and ER in treadmill surfaces. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7249199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72491992020-06-10 A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces Colino, Enrique Garcia-Unanue, Jorge Van Hooren, Bas Gallardo, Leonor Meijer, Kenneth Lucia, Alejandro Felipe, Jose Luis Sensors (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to define a reliable and sensitive test method for assessing Shock Absorption (SA), Vertical Deformation (VD), and Energy Restitution (ER) in treadmill surfaces. A total of 42 treadmills belonging to four different models were included in the study: (a) Technogym Jog700 Excite (n = 10), (b) Technogym Artis Run (n = 12), (c) LifeFitness Integrity Series 97T (n = 11), and (d) LifeFitness Integrity Series DX (n = 9). An advanced artificial athlete (AAA) device was used to assess SA, VD, and ER at three different locations along the longitudinal axis of each treadmill and in the support area of the athletes’ feet. For each location, our results show that the error assumed when performing one impact with the AAA instead of three (SA ≤ |0.1|%, VD ≤ |0.0| mm, and ER ≤ |0.2|%) is lower than the smallest changes that can be detected by the measuring device (SA = 0.4%, VD = 0.2 mm, and ER = 0.9%). Also, our results show the ability of the test method to detect meaningful differences between locations once the one-impact criterium is adopted, since absolute minimum differences between zones (SA: |0.6|%, VD: |0.3| mm, and ER: |1.2|%) were above the uncertainty of the measuring device. Therefore, performing a single impact with the AAA in each of the three locations described in this study can be considered a representative and reliable method for assessing SA, VD, and ER in treadmill surfaces. MDPI 2020-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7249199/ /pubmed/32397664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20092724 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Colino, Enrique Garcia-Unanue, Jorge Van Hooren, Bas Gallardo, Leonor Meijer, Kenneth Lucia, Alejandro Felipe, Jose Luis A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces |
title | A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces |
title_full | A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces |
title_fullStr | A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces |
title_short | A Proposed Method to Assess the Mechanical Properties of Treadmill Surfaces |
title_sort | proposed method to assess the mechanical properties of treadmill surfaces |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32397664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20092724 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT colinoenrique aproposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces AT garciaunanuejorge aproposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces AT vanhoorenbas aproposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces AT gallardoleonor aproposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces AT meijerkenneth aproposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces AT luciaalejandro aproposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces AT felipejoseluis aproposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces AT colinoenrique proposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces AT garciaunanuejorge proposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces AT vanhoorenbas proposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces AT gallardoleonor proposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces AT meijerkenneth proposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces AT luciaalejandro proposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces AT felipejoseluis proposedmethodtoassessthemechanicalpropertiesoftreadmillsurfaces |