Cargando…

Dual-Energy CT Follow-Up After Stroke Thrombolysis Alters Assessment of Hemorrhagic Complications

Background and Purpose: We aimed to determine whether dual-energy CT (DECT) follow-up can differentiate contrast staining (CS) from intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), who had undergone acute stroke imaging using CT angiography (CTA), and CT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almqvist, Håkan, Almqvist, Niklas S., Holmin, Staffan, Mazya, Michael V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32508735
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00357
_version_ 1783538557398286336
author Almqvist, Håkan
Almqvist, Niklas S.
Holmin, Staffan
Mazya, Michael V.
author_facet Almqvist, Håkan
Almqvist, Niklas S.
Holmin, Staffan
Mazya, Michael V.
author_sort Almqvist, Håkan
collection PubMed
description Background and Purpose: We aimed to determine whether dual-energy CT (DECT) follow-up can differentiate contrast staining (CS) from intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), who had undergone acute stroke imaging using CT angiography (CTA), and CT perfusion (CTP). Materials and Methods: Between November 2012 and January 2018, 168 patients at our comprehensive stroke center underwent DECT follow-up within 36 h after IVT and acute CTA with or without CTP but did not receive intra-arterial imaging or treatment. Two independent readers evaluated plain monochromatic CT (pCT) alone and compared this with a second reading of a combined DECT approach using pCT and water- and iodine-weighted images, establishing and grading the ICH diagnosis, per Heidelberg and Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) classifications. Results: On pCT alone within 36 h, 31/168 (18.5%) patients had findings diagnosed as ICH. Using combined DECT (cDECT) changed ICH diagnosis to “CS only” in 3/168 (1.8%) patients, constituting 3/31 (9.7%) of cases with initially pCT-diagnosed ICH. These three cases had pCT diagnoses of one SAH, one minor, and one more extensive petechial hemorrhage (hemorrhagic infarction types 1 and 2), respectively. pCT alone had a 100% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 90% positive predictive value (PPV), 100% negative predictive value (NPV), and 98% accuracy for any ICH, compared to the cDECT. Inter-reader agreement for ICH classification using pCT compared to DECT was weighted kappa 0.92 (95% CI 0.87–0.98) vs. 0.91 (0.85–0.95). Conclusion: Compared to pCT, DECT within 36 h after IV thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke, changes the radiological diagnosis of post-treatment ICH to “CS only” in a small proportion of patients. Studies are warranted of whether the altered radiological reports have an impact on patient management, for example initiation timing of antithrombotic secondary prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7249255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72492552020-06-05 Dual-Energy CT Follow-Up After Stroke Thrombolysis Alters Assessment of Hemorrhagic Complications Almqvist, Håkan Almqvist, Niklas S. Holmin, Staffan Mazya, Michael V. Front Neurol Neurology Background and Purpose: We aimed to determine whether dual-energy CT (DECT) follow-up can differentiate contrast staining (CS) from intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), who had undergone acute stroke imaging using CT angiography (CTA), and CT perfusion (CTP). Materials and Methods: Between November 2012 and January 2018, 168 patients at our comprehensive stroke center underwent DECT follow-up within 36 h after IVT and acute CTA with or without CTP but did not receive intra-arterial imaging or treatment. Two independent readers evaluated plain monochromatic CT (pCT) alone and compared this with a second reading of a combined DECT approach using pCT and water- and iodine-weighted images, establishing and grading the ICH diagnosis, per Heidelberg and Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) classifications. Results: On pCT alone within 36 h, 31/168 (18.5%) patients had findings diagnosed as ICH. Using combined DECT (cDECT) changed ICH diagnosis to “CS only” in 3/168 (1.8%) patients, constituting 3/31 (9.7%) of cases with initially pCT-diagnosed ICH. These three cases had pCT diagnoses of one SAH, one minor, and one more extensive petechial hemorrhage (hemorrhagic infarction types 1 and 2), respectively. pCT alone had a 100% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 90% positive predictive value (PPV), 100% negative predictive value (NPV), and 98% accuracy for any ICH, compared to the cDECT. Inter-reader agreement for ICH classification using pCT compared to DECT was weighted kappa 0.92 (95% CI 0.87–0.98) vs. 0.91 (0.85–0.95). Conclusion: Compared to pCT, DECT within 36 h after IV thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke, changes the radiological diagnosis of post-treatment ICH to “CS only” in a small proportion of patients. Studies are warranted of whether the altered radiological reports have an impact on patient management, for example initiation timing of antithrombotic secondary prevention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7249255/ /pubmed/32508735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00357 Text en Copyright © 2020 Almqvist, Almqvist, Holmin and Mazya. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Almqvist, Håkan
Almqvist, Niklas S.
Holmin, Staffan
Mazya, Michael V.
Dual-Energy CT Follow-Up After Stroke Thrombolysis Alters Assessment of Hemorrhagic Complications
title Dual-Energy CT Follow-Up After Stroke Thrombolysis Alters Assessment of Hemorrhagic Complications
title_full Dual-Energy CT Follow-Up After Stroke Thrombolysis Alters Assessment of Hemorrhagic Complications
title_fullStr Dual-Energy CT Follow-Up After Stroke Thrombolysis Alters Assessment of Hemorrhagic Complications
title_full_unstemmed Dual-Energy CT Follow-Up After Stroke Thrombolysis Alters Assessment of Hemorrhagic Complications
title_short Dual-Energy CT Follow-Up After Stroke Thrombolysis Alters Assessment of Hemorrhagic Complications
title_sort dual-energy ct follow-up after stroke thrombolysis alters assessment of hemorrhagic complications
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7249255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32508735
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00357
work_keys_str_mv AT almqvisthakan dualenergyctfollowupafterstrokethrombolysisaltersassessmentofhemorrhagiccomplications
AT almqvistniklass dualenergyctfollowupafterstrokethrombolysisaltersassessmentofhemorrhagiccomplications
AT holminstaffan dualenergyctfollowupafterstrokethrombolysisaltersassessmentofhemorrhagiccomplications
AT mazyamichaelv dualenergyctfollowupafterstrokethrombolysisaltersassessmentofhemorrhagiccomplications